Amicus Rising… Part one…

[subdued_passion]

I saw metro sex and thought it was some new kind of kink (I dunno- people having sex on/in the metro). Even if it's shortened, shouldn't it be metrosex and not 'metro sex'?


Abortion is not murder and that's only because it is lawful. That is the only distinction really. I'm pro-choice. I believe it's the woman's right to choose because it's her body and either way she's one who has to live with the decision. And I understand the need to sugar coat it because I wouldn't want any woman to be traumatised by the associated guilt of her actions but I also find it weird when during discussions people argue that it's not a form of murder.

 

[Liar]

I saw metro sex and thought it was some new kind of kink (I dunno- people having sex on/in the metro). Even if it's shortened, shouldn't it be metrosex and not 'metro sex'?

Shagging on a subway. Of course.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Well, you've lived to play another day.



Good for you. Give 'em Hell Harry...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I saw metro sex and thought it was some new kind of kink (I dunno- people having sex on/in the metro). Even if it's shortened, shouldn't it be metrosex and not 'metro sex'?


Abortion is not murder and that's only because it is lawful. That is the only distinction really. I'm pro-choice. I believe it's the woman's right to choose because it's her body and either way she's one who has to live with the decision. And I understand the need to sugar coat it because I wouldn't want any woman to be traumatised by the associated guilt of her actions but I also find it weird when during discussions people argue that it's not a form of murder.

But we're only in it for the short-term, when a woman hits that point where she begins to have regrets, then she becomes a target of the oh so very compassionate, tolerant, concerned and caring pro-choice crowd, just like any member of a minority or identified voter group who wanders off the "reservation."

Furthermore, pro-choice is a subtle hypocrisy. They all decide at which point they want in the pregnancy to begin telling a woman what she can or cannot do to her body until you get to the logical conclusion which is Tiller and Gosnell. The biggest debate that the pro-choice crowd isn't do we have the right to terminate a life, but at what point do we switch to pro-life.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

I saw metro sex and thought it was some new kind of kink (I dunno- people having sex on/in the metro). Even if it's shortened, shouldn't it be metrosex and not 'metro sex'?


Abortion is not murder and that's only because it is lawful. That is the only distinction really. I'm pro-choice. I believe it's the woman's right to choose because it's her body and either way she's one who has to live with the decision. And I understand the need to sugar coat it because I wouldn't want any woman to be traumatised by the associated guilt of her actions but I also find it weird when during discussions people argue that it's not a form of murder.

Blacks get more abortions than any racial group so I'm for it!

 

[Sammael Bard]

Blacks get more abortions than any racial group so I'm for it!

And the old fart has farted....again!

 

[subdued_passion]

Shagging on a subway. Of course.

I recently learnt the word for this genre of porn- chikan. And metros are buses in some places. And since this is an adult forum-

http://www.hot-sex-tube.com/o.php?i...xvideos.com/video7748328/bonnie_shai_bus_fuck

But we're only in it for the short-term, when a woman hits that point where she begins to have regrets, then she becomes a target of the oh so very compassionate, tolerant, concerned and caring pro-choice crowd, just like any member of a minority or identified voter group who wanders off the "reservation."

Furthermore, pro-choice is a subtle hypocrisy. They all decide at which point they want in the pregnancy to begin telling a woman what she can or cannot do to her body until you get to the logical conclusion which is Tiller and Gosnell. The biggest debate that the pro-choice crowd isn't do we have the right to terminate a life, but at what point do we switch to pro-life.

I don't really understand your post. But the way I see it, life expectancy is high, mortality rates lower. We don't need to coerce people (using the law, religion, their own guilt/conscience) to have babies they're not ready to be responsible for. I've heard many people argue that you can just give birth and then give the child up for adoption like that's more humane just because you let it live (knowing it was unwanted and unloved). I see it as a form of mercy killing (which is murder because it is unlawful in most places).

 

[cowslinger64]

But we're only in it for the short-term, when a woman hits that point where she begins to have regrets, then she becomes a target of the oh so very compassionate, tolerant, concerned and caring pro-choice crowd, just like any member of a minority or identified voter group who wanders off the "reservation."

Furthermore, pro-choice is a subtle hypocrisy. They all decide at which point they want in the pregnancy to begin telling a woman what she can or cannot do to her body until you get to the logical conclusion which is Tiller and Gosnell. The biggest debate that the pro-choice crowd isn't do we have the right to terminate a life, but at what point do we switch to pro-life.

The biggest "debate" is that it's none of your business.

The rest of your post is the same tired ole garbage too.. none of it is even remotely true. Many of us only wish for her to have the right to choose, it's not my place to think of her before or after she chooses that path. IT'S NONE OF ANYONE ELSE'S BUSINESS.

BTW...this is me not being relevant... it's pointing out how absurd your way of thinking is. I still enjoy doing it from time to time, even tho you pussied your way out of discussing it.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

And the old fart has farted....again!

We should pay black girls to abort.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

...

I don't really understand your post. But the way I see it, life expectancy is high, mortality rates lower. We don't need to coerce people (using the law, religion, their own guilt/conscience) to have babies they're not ready to be responsible for. I've heard many people argue that you can just give birth and then give the child up for adoption like that's more humane just because you let it live (knowing it was unwanted and unloved). I see it as a form of mercy killing (which is murder because it is unlawful in most places).

Once you accept the concept of one killing as a mercy killing, then any killing can be a mercy killing starting with the elderly, the sick, the retarded, the comatose...,



... [voice=busybody] THE MUZZIES! [/voice]...,

Ann Hecht...

West Coast Rappers...

The entire cast of Cats or Friends...

 

[Sammael Bard]

We should pay black girls to abort.

And why does that sound so amusing to you?

 

[Liar]

And why does that sound so amusing to you?

Because trolls gotta troll.

 

[cowslinger64]

Love how the right wing fanatics always try to tie other stuff in when their arguments fall completely flat. Abortions lead to death panels and euthanasia... homosexuality leads to having sex with animals and inanimate objects... weed use leads to heroin meth or cocaine use.. One ridiculous argument after another.

 

[amicus]

Not going back to the quack that said angioplasty was essentially a walk in the park. For those of you who face hardening of the arteries due to age or other causes, I offer this as educational:

~~~

http://ehealthmd.com/content/risks-and-possible-complications#axzz380HZAGCP

Angioplasty is considered safe and effective, although, as with all medical treatments, there is some risk. In general, possible complications fall into two categories:

• Acute complications - These are complications that occasionally occur during the procedure or immediately afterward.

• Long-term complications - Even when the angioplasty procedure is performed without problems, the artery can narrow again months afterward, causing chest pain to return. This complication is called restenosis.
Acute Complications

Angioplasty is a very safe procedure when performed by experienced cardiologists at top-notch medical centers. In a small percentage of patients, an artery may abruptly close during the procedure, which may trigger a heart attack. A heart attack may also occur if a blood clot is dislodged during angioplasty and completely blocks the artery, cutting off blood and oxygen to the heart.
These complications may or may not require emergency bypass surgery. The death rate among patients who have angioplasty is very tiny, about 0.1% (compared to 1% to 2% for routine bypass surgery).

Restenosis

Restenosis is the most troublesome problem hampering the success of angioplasty. Restenosis is a medical term that refers to the gradual re-narrowing of the artery during several months following the procedure.
• Sometimes, restenosis is caused by blood clots occurring at or near the site of the treatment. Aspirin, heparin, or combinations of anti-clotting drugs are generally used before and after the procedures to try and prevent this.
• Coronary stents that are coated with anti-clotting drugs are now being used in the hope of preventing the immediate formation of blood clots and, over time, restenosis.
Researchers are gaining a better understanding of the restenosis process and experimenting with several different approaches to prevent it. They believe that three complex, interrelated mechanisms are involved.
• Within hours after an angioplasty procedure, the walls of the artery may start to recoil, gradually "caving in" to their original position. This can reduce the channel that was created, sometimes by as much as half.
• Angioplasty, by pressing against the artery wall and creating tiny cracks in the plaque, causes a certain amount of injury to the artery wall. As the body attempts to heal itself, special blood cells that are involved in clotting, called platelets, may accumulate, possibly causing a blood clot.
• Blood clots create a substance, thrombin, that causes the cells of the artery to multiply and new tissue to form. This is a helpful part of the healing process - but, if too much tissue is formed, it can reduce the flow of blood through the artery.


Read more: http://ehealthmd.com/content/risks-and-possible-complications#ixzz380IhppEd


http://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/angioplasty-for-peripheral-arterial-disease-of-the-legs
Risks
Complications related to the catheter include:
• Pain, swelling, and tenderness at the catheter insertion site.
• Irritation of the vein by the catheter (superficial thrombophlebitis).
• Bleeding at the catheter site.
• A bruise where the catheter was inserted. This usually goes away in a few days.
Serious complications are rare. These complications may include:
• Sudden closure of the artery.
• Blood clots.
• A small tear in the inner lining of the artery.
• An allergic reaction to the contrast material used to view the arteries.
• Kidney damage. In rare cases, the contrast material can damage the kidneys, possibly causing kidney failure.
Radiation risk
There is always a slight risk of damage to cells or tissues from being exposed to any radiation, including the low levels of X-ray used for this test. But the risk of damage from the X-rays is usually very low compared with the potential benefits of the test.

~~~

Now... you may wander into the hospital all pumped and happy to have such a small risk to your life, and I wish you well. But may I suggest getting your affairs in order before you do.

amicus

 

[Sammael Bard]

~~~

You, my dear, can surely believe whatever you wish...

I am an honorable man with a well defined moral and ethical system that I have publically explained over radio and television and with thousands of Posts here and elsewhere.

There is good and evil in the world, even your myopic vision and see that, and I am one of the good guys, taking the time to explain to others why you are evil and one of the bad guys.

amicus one of the good guys...

Why should I consider your statements true, as you've given me no reasons whatsoever?

"Amicus the good guy.

The End."

Self-righteous pompous assery, it is.

Nothing less, if not anything more.

 

[subdued_passion]

Blacks get more abortions than any racial group so I'm for it!

Why?

Once you accept the concept of one killing as a mercy killing, then any killing can be a mercy killing starting with the elderly, the sick, the retarded, the comatose...,



... [voice=busybody] THE MUZZIES! [/voice]...,

Ann Hecht...

West Coast Rappers...

The entire cast of Cats or Friends...

Makes you really question the laws concerning euthanasia, right? I mean if one is legal why not the other? i guess as far as the law is concerned one is an individual with rights and the other is a parasite dependent on its host. Of course ask a woman who's been trying to get pregnant for years if she'll consider that spec finally growing in her womb as a parasite or less of an individual than anyone she knows...

Love how the right wing fanatics always try to tie other stuff in when their arguments fall completely flat. Abortions lead to death panels and euthanasia... homosexuality leads to having sex with animals and inanimate objects... weed use leads to heroin meth or cocaine use.. One ridiculous argument after another.

Which is why it's so good that you're here to let the rest of us clueless folks know what's what.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

...

Makes you really question the laws concerning euthanasia, right? I mean if one is legal why not the other? i guess as far as the law is concerned one is an individual with rights and the other is a parasite dependent on its host. Of course ask a woman who's been trying to get pregnant for years if she'll consider that spec finally growing in her womb as a parasite or less of an individual than anyone she knows...

...

I have trouble calling human life parasitic, unwanted or just a mass of tissue...



Every pogrom initiated by man has begun with the dehumanization of the target group.

 

[cowslinger64]

Why?


Which is why it's so good that you're here to let the rest of us clueless folks know what's what.

My post wasn't directed at you...no need to be a smart ass.

 

[subdued_passion]

I have trouble calling human life parasitic, unwanted or just a mass of tissue...



Every pogrom initiated by man has begun with the dehumanization of the target group.

Do you mean the way some of the people here like to talk about minorities or people of colour?

 

[Sammael Bard]

Do you mean the way some of the people here like to talk about minorities or people of colour?

Research on JBJ and you'll get your answer.

 

[subdued_passion]

My post wasn't directed at you...no need to be a smart ass.

It wasn't directed at me, but i found you annoying enough to respond anyway.

YW.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Do you mean the way some of the people here like to talk about minorities or people of colour?

Exactly: Just as Throb talks about my daughter or myself as minorities.

 

[amicus]

You consider a zygote a human being

really?

really?

really?

jesus christ man, you must consider yourself a serial killer every time you masturbate

a zygote is a collection of cells.. you know..like ebola....to claim that it's a human being is the pinnacle of stupidity


and dont claim my arguements are silly when you created them in the first place.. you were the one that claimed that society was going down the shitter since the advancement of a woman's rights.. when historically your whining has been a constant them throughout humanity';s existence.. every society complains about the decadence it has fallen into.. go look up Socrates.. he had horrible things to say about Athenian youth..................just because you have no objective viewpoint of history, doesnt make you right

population of US 1980 : 226,545,805

population of US 2013 : 316,148,990

somehow you think 314 Million is less people than 226 million people

what documentation on same sex parents being worse then straight ones? you didnt provide any


human behaviour does mirror animal behaviour... because humans are animals.. our strongest instincts, just like animals are survival and reproduction.. we simply change survival into greed, and reproduction into lust

and if we are truly higher then animals, then you should celebrate homosexuality.. because it is a step away from our base animal nature..




if everything you say can be documented.. why dont you document it.. even your Princeton ramble was about the zygote being a living collection of cells.. you know, like cancer is a living collection of cells

you're an intellectual fraud who thinks rambling on and on will somehow excuse your basic lack of knowledge

if you can find accredited research to support your claims, then show it.. your documentation so far has only reinforced my arguement that an embryo is not a human being

~~~

Just to remind others, you wrote this in your original Post: "there were 330 million people in the US in 1980.. there are now slightly under 400 million people in the states"

Lightning will not strike if you admit you made an error... unless you consider 80 million to be slightly under four hundred million, but then again, as with all you hysterectomy, oops, hysterical rants, you exaggeration is noted.

If any guy can masturbate and ejaculate a fertilized egg, I think we should know about it...

~~

Fertilized egg

A zygote (from Greek ζυγωτός zygōtos "joined" or "yoked", from ζυγοῦν zygoun "to join" or "to yoke"),[1] is the initial cell formed when two gamete cells are joined by means of sexual reproduction. In multicellular organisms, it is the earliest developmental stage of the embryo. In single-celled organisms, the zygote divides to produce offspring, usually through mitosis, the process of cell division.

In multicellular organisms, a zygote is always synthesized from the union of two gametes, and constitutes the first stage in a unique organism's development. (that would be called life)

Your ideology is so sick and perverted that you think you can lie your way through anything.

wrong

amicus the truthsayer

 

[cowslinger64]

It wasn't directed at me, but i found you annoying enough to respond anyway.

YW.

That's fine. From the few posts I've read of yours, I find you to be constantly annoying... but I kept it to myself, my mistake..

 

[Sammael Bard]

~~~

amicus the truthsayer

In your next post, we will love to hear:

amicus the real Jesus.