Another synagogue shooting

dudly, I already answered your question. And threw in a bonus answer too.

It's not my fault you can't keep up with the rest of the class.

It might be of help to Dudly to know that a prosecutor does not exonerate anyone, only a jury can do that. This is a unique report delivered by a team of prosecutors. It hasn't been adjudicated in a court of law, reviewed by a judge, heard by a Jury, nor has any of it been subject to cross examination by competent defense counsel. It's a one sided report no US attorney could ever get away with.
 
Don't talk down to me, birther boy.


The BuzzFeed story on Jan. 17 began, "President Donald Trump directed his longtime attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, according to two federal law enforcement officials involved in an investigation of the matter."

But, while Mueller acknowledged there was evidence that Trump knew Cohen had provided Congress with false testimony about the Russian business venture, "the evidence available to us does not establish that the President directed or aided Cohen's false testimony."

In Mueller's report, it says that when Cohen was working on his statement to congressional investigators, which he provided in late 2017, the attorney "had extensive discussions with the President's personal counsel, who, according to Cohen, said that Cohen should not contradict the President and should keep the statement short and 'tight.'"


There is still some bullshit to be found.. Whether your opinion is incontrovertible, remains to be seen.


I should have left out my warning about collusion... you would have used that.

So 2 things have come out of your elucidation today:

1. You talked to your mom.

2. You acknowledged that the Mueller report proved that some of the things that have been widely said about Trump aren't true.

Congratulations. It's amazing what paying attention can do for you.
 
It might be of help to Dudly to know that a prosecutor does not exonerate anyone, only a jury can do that. This is a unique report delivered by a team of prosecutors. It hasn't been adjudicated in a court of law, reviewed by a judge, heard by a Jury, nor has any of it been subject to cross examination by competent defense counsel. It's a one sided report no US attorney could ever get away with.

Hey dumbass.. The president said he was exonerated.. along with too many in the gop leadership, as well as you, timmy and the rest of the trumpsters.


I know how it works.. and this was not some heinous deep state witch hunt.. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
So 2 things have come out of your elucidation today:

1. You talked to your mom.

2. You acknowledged that the Mueller report proved that some of the things that have been widely said about Trump aren't true.

Congratulations. It's amazing what paying attention can do for you.

My mom passed away. But hey, you keep on banging that drum like the moron you are.


The full report has not been witnessed by anyone other than a handpicked AG and his assistant.

The president HAS NOT BEEN EXONERATED. With all the things he could be, having one or two doesn't mean a whole helluva lot.


Again, you're a birther. Enuff said.
 
It might be of help to Dudly to know that a prosecutor does not exonerate anyone, only a jury can do that. This is a unique report delivered by a team of prosecutors. It hasn't been adjudicated in a court of law, reviewed by a judge, heard by a Jury, nor has any of it been subject to cross examination by competent defense counsel. It's a one sided report no US attorney could ever get away with.

Well, in this regard, the fact that the Mueller report disposed of more than a few of the MSM talking points by saying "no evidence..." is an exoneration.

I mean, if there's "no evidence' then there's "no evidence". To say that there is, in the face of that conclusion, is ludicrous.

When someone makes a claim, which after investigation there is no evidence to support, that's an exoneration because it shows the claim to be false.
 
My mom passed away. But hey, you keep on banging that drum like the moron you are.


The full report has not been witnessed by anyone other than a handpicked AG and his assistant.

The president HAS NOT BEEN EXONERATED. With all the things he could be, having one or two doesn't mean a whole helluva lot.


Again, you're a birther. Enuff said.

No one said you couldn't talk to your mom even though she's passed. People do it all the time.

The rest is merely spittle and spite and not worthy of further response.
 
No one said you couldn't talk to your mom even though she's passed. People do it all the time.

The rest is merely spittle and spite and not worthy of further response.

You got nuthin much. Which is to be expected.


You're still a fuckin moron.. and it was you that brought trump into this.


:rolleyes:
 
No it isn't. Quit parroting nonsense.

That stuff is just something that dems say every election cycle to scare people of color to the poles. They have nothing to offer but fear itself.

LOL, Trump started his campaign by whipping up fear about Mexicans and he hasn't stopped for a single moment since then.

Although he has also whipped up fear about:
- Liberals taking guns
- Socialism
- Obamacare

But yeah, it's liberals running on fear. :D
 
You got nuthin much. Which is to be expected.


You're still a fuckin moron.. and it was you that brought trump into this.


:rolleyes:

*sigh*

It's still not my fault you can't keep up with the rest of the class.
 
Well, in this regard, the fact that the Mueller report disposed of more than a few of the MSM talking points by saying "no evidence..." is an exoneration.

I mean, if there's "no evidence' then there's "no evidence". To say that there is, in the face of that conclusion, is ludicrous.

When someone makes a claim, which after investigation there is no evidence to support, that's an exoneration because it shows the claim to be false.

My point is, in the legal sense the job of a prosecutor is to indict or not indict which is based on evidence revealed by investigation. If said evidence isn't available, or evidence sufficient to convince a Jury of guilt is absent, the target is not indicted.

Mueller however went further. He inserted politically provocative language into the report suggesting that despite all of his efforts and those of his investigators there may have been some elusive evidence of obstruction he couldn't find and left it up to the AG to sort out...which he did. So, in my opinion the AG acting from within the authority and discretion given him by the regulation, exonerated the President of obstruction of justice. To me and others this was a political calculation by Mueller to create a path to impeachment he had no business acting upon.
 
"[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," reads Barr's letter to Congress, quoting Mueller directly.​

Shall we keep trying to spin the report, or do its own words not matter?
 
more details leaking out about the shooter ("Vettefriend") in California yesterday.

He broadcast his shooting on Facebook Live but screwed up and set the broadcast audience setting to "private", so nobody but him got to witness his carnage. D'OH!

This is all a big game to the White Nationalists (and their Semi-White Nationalist auxiliary). :rolleyes:
 
My point is, in the legal sense the job of a prosecutor is to indict or not indict which is based on evidence revealed by investigation. If said evidence isn't available, or evidence sufficient to convince a Jury of guilt is absent, the target is not indicted.

Mueller however went further. He inserted politically provocative language into the report suggesting that despite all of his efforts and those of his investigators there may have been some elusive evidence of obstruction he couldn't find and left it up to the AG to sort out...which he did. So, in my opinion the AG acting from within the authority and discretion given him by the regulation, exonerated the President of obstruction of justice. To me and others this was a political calculation by Mueller to create a path to impeachment he had no business acting upon.

Funny how barr came in and just the right time, huh?


Mueller has forgotten more about the law and procedures than you and all "the others" you know put together will ever know.

He left the investigation open for Congress to take it up, along with all the state investigations to continue.

It was the opinion of Barr and not being able to indict a president that I AND MANY OTHERS believe affected how the investigation wrapped up.
 
more details leaking out about the shooter.
He broadcast his shooting on Facebook Live but screwed up and set the broadcast audience setting to "private", so nobody but him got to witness his carnage. D'OH!

Apparently his firearm malfunctioned too during the shooting.
People were lucky with such a clown. This time.
 
Apparently his firearm malfunctioned too during the shooting.
People were lucky with such a clown. This time.

It will happen again... and again...and again...and again... because the right wing believes this a right
 
It will happen again... and again...and again...and again... because the right wing believes this a right

The right wing doesn't believe mass shootings are a right.

Why are you so dishonest? :confused:
 
"[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," reads Barr's letter to Congress, quoting Mueller directly.​

Shall we keep trying to spin the report, or do its own words not matter?

TDS strikes again....
 
It will happen again... and again...and again...and again... because the right wing believes this a right

I agree with what you're saying.
Right wing White extremism has been on the rise globally, and is now posing similar dangers to ISIS. Even Russia's chief of Intel drew the alarm.

I only disagree with what people include in the definition, and some of the inuendoes in this thread.

Some of the people on this board do shoot off their mouth and say racist things at times - for which they deserve to be admonished when they do it
but they have nothing in common with such psychopaths.
I'm more judgmental of those who engage in such serious accusations.
 
The right wing doesn't believe mass shootings are a right.

Why are you so dishonest? :confused:

Then do something to prevent further occurrences. It took New Zealand 3 days to try something different. It has been 20 yrs since Columbine. When is enough enough?
 
The hatred was this bad 20yrs ago. The only difference is the internet allows the acts to be known quicker and helps insane people find other insane people easier. Like the rwcj club here on lit.

It will happen again... and again...and again...and again... because the right wing believes this a right


The Board is awash with anti-semitic comments made by GB Liberals.
If I'm not mistaken, you made them too.

Should we start pointing fingers at them too and claim that they are dancing of joy after this and the Pittsburgh massacres?

Of course not, that would be inappropriate and stupid.
 
Oliver North understands you are losing this battle. He spoke up...and is removed as President of the NRA.
 
Back
Top