Another synagogue shooting

[Matthew Craig]

Then do something to prevent further occurrences. It took New Zealand 3 days to try something different. It has been 20 yrs since Columbine. When is enough enough?

Guns are not the problem. Taking away guns doesn't stop suicide bombers, vehicular manslaughter or even stabbings/beheadings. You're beyond stupid.

 

[Dribble]

Guns are not the problem. Taking away guns doesn't stop suicide bombers, vehicular manslaughter or even stabbings/beheadings. You're beyond stupid.

Then do something to fix the problem. It is you that is beyond stupid. Doing nothing...is stupid

 

[beew]

Guns are not the problem. Taking away guns doesn't stop suicide bombers, vehicular manslaughter or even stabbings/beheadings. You're beyond stupid.

Gosh, this American pro-gun ideology seems so incomprehensible to me and to my friends who live there.

What do they think? That the Government is going to round people up and shoot them, so they need to be armed?

 

[Matthew Craig]

Gosh, this American pro-gun ideology seems so incomprehensible to me and to my friends who live there.

What do they think? That the Government is going to round people up and shoot them, so they need to be armed?

That's exactly what could happen. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

 

[Matthew Craig]

Then do something to fix the problem. It is you that is beyond stupid. Doing nothing...is stupid

You and i have very different opinions on what the "doing something" part is.

 

[Dribble]

Gosh, this American pro-gun ideology seems so incomprehensible to me and to my friends who live there.

What do they think? That the Government is going to round people up and shoot them, so they need to be armed?

Yes

Furthermore, they think they will take out the platoon that comes for them. Me? I would drone them instead of sending a platoon. More fun.

 

[Dribble]

You and i have very different opinions on what the "doing something" part is.

Obviously. You sit there talking shit. While I am active in my community making positive changes. I wonder which side will win? Lol

 

[Boxlicker101]

And the President "grabs 'em by the pussy" which is sexual assault.

It is not sexual assault if the woman encourages such liberties or even just permits them. When The Donald was interviewed in 2005, those were the circumstances he described.

Occasionally, I have fondled a woman's or girl's sex organs, to our mutual pleasure. I'm sure most men have. These are the kinds of actions that allow the human race to survive.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Lol... oh no, that's a DIFFERENT kind of Elk!! Haven't you heard? The new dictionary meaning for Elk is a type of people. Or some such nonsense.

That's some BotanyBoy-class dictionary work there, son!

 

[Dribble]

It is not sexual assault if the woman encourages such liberties or even just permits them. When The Donald was interviewed in 2005, those were the circumstances he described.

.

But not the circumstances they described. But hey...they dont matter right?

 

[HisArpy]

"[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," reads Barr's letter to Congress, quoting Mueller directly.​

Shall we keep trying to spin the report, or do its own words not matter?

I did not say that the Mueller report exonerated Trump of the allegations Mueller was charged with investigating.

What I said was:

What another does is not the fault of one who speaks unless the speech is intended to achieve the desired acts by others.

Trump's been said to do all kinds of horrible things. Yet, now that we know from the Mueller report that at least 1 of those things was fake news, one MUST wonder whether the rest is of similar elk.

Go back and examine his speeches and see for yourself. I'll bet you that you cannot find a single example of Trump actually endorsing any of the racist things the MSM says he does.

What you WILL find is the MSM saying "he said X" when in fact he didn't. They are using their false narrative on what was said to promote a specific anti-Trump agenda. And almost everyone fell for it. What's worse is that despite it all starting to fall apart for them, the progressives are STILL spouting the same lies.

Gullible but tenacious is probably the most polite descriptor I can think of. Flaming idjits more accurately described them though.

Post #95

Notice how I said that Trump has been charged with all kinds of horrible things. And yet, Mueller concluded that the evidence he could gather didn't prove those horrible things.

But then you may argue I did say this:

Well, in this regard, the fact that the Mueller report disposed of more than a few of the MSM talking points by saying "no evidence..." is an exoneration.

I mean, if there's "no evidence' then there's "no evidence". To say that there is, in the face of that conclusion, is ludicrous.

When someone makes a claim, which after investigation there is no evidence to support, that's an exoneration because it shows the claim to be false.

Post 183

In that post I did use the word "exoneration" but if you actually read the post you'll notice I didn't say Trump was exonerated from the allegations Mueller was investigating. Instead I said he was exonerated on some of the talking points the MSM has been saying are "beyond doubt" as true. Since there is no evidence, the talking points are false and that IS an "exoneration" of sorts.

Thus, your attempt to spin the words of others into something they are not is a failure.

 

[RobDownSouth]

...speaking of attempting to spin words....

I did not say that the Mueller report exonerated Trump ...
What I said was:

.... I did use the word "exoneration" but if you actually read the post you'll notice I didn't say Trump was exonerated .... Instead I said he was exonerated ... Since there is no evidence, ...that IS an "exoneration" of sorts.

Thus, your attempt to spin the words of others into something they are not is a failure.

Today we learned that in RWCJ-speak, "exoneration" is not the same as "exonerated", because reasons.

 

[Matthew Craig]

Obviously. You sit there talking shit. While I am active in my community making positive changes. I wonder which side will win? Lol

Everything bottom lines at money. I use all of my purchasing power and resources in ways i see fit.

 

[cowslinger64]

Today we learned that in RWCJ-speak, "exoneration" is not the same as "exonerated", because reasons.

Lol... there's a billion things he could be charged with, but there possibly, may be one or two he won't...so EXONERATION!!

His handpicked ag redacted most of it... and the ball lickers rejoice!!

 

[beew]

Aah, the charm of Lit.
Everybody's busy trolling somebody.

 

[HisArpy]

Today we learned that in RWCJ-speak, "exoneration" is not the same as "exonerated", because reasons.

No, today we learned to Rubberydownsouth can't comprehend the things he reads on Lit so he has to make up shit.

Not that we didn't know that already.

 

[bbx56]

I agree with what you're saying.
Right wing White extremism has been on the rise globally, and is now posing similar dangers to ISIS. Even Russia's chief of Intel drew the alarm.

I only disagree with what people include in the definition, and some of the inuendoes in this thread.

Some of the people on this board do shoot off their mouth and say racist things at times - for which they deserve to be admonished when they do it
but they have nothing in common with such psychopaths.
I'm more judgmental of those who engage in such serious accusations.

Go fuck off, Nigger

 

[Que]

Lol... there's a billion things he could be charged with, but there possibly, may be one or two he won't...so EXONERATION!!

His handpicked ag redacted most of it... and the ball lickers rejoice!!

How has every other AG been picked?

Draw straws? Rochambeau?

 

[HisArpy]

Lol... there's a billion things he could be charged with, but there possibly, may be one or two he won't...so EXONERATION!!

His handpicked ag redacted most of it... and the ball lickers rejoice!!

As usual, you conflate something specific with your hasty generalization and then proclaim that that's what someone else said.

You and Rubbery, two idiots sharing a bathtub of ideas made entirely of soap bubbles.

 

[HisArpy]

How has every other AG been picked?

Draw straws? Rochambeau?

But, but TRUMP!!!

 

[beew]

Go fuck off, Nigger

 

[cowslinger64]

How has every other AG been picked?

Draw straws? Rochambeau?

Has another administration under investigation like this one, been allowed to pick someone who has already come out in favor of a sitting president in this matter?


Are you guys so fuckin blind you can't see that?


You know good and well, that if Obama had done anything like this, you'd be all over it.

 

[von_Bismarck]

What, that kinda language doesn't turn you on?

Edit: Comment was directed at beew-hashtag.

 

[cowslinger64]

As usual, you conflate something specific with your hasty generalization and then proclaim that that's what someone else said.

You and Rubbery, two idiots sharing a bathtub of ideas made entirely of soap bubbles.

You and the big giant head, lickin those balls like the good little idiots trump expects you to be.

 

[HisArpy]

You and the big giant head, lickin those balls like the good little idiots trump expects you to be.

Dam, that's twice today you've hurt my feelers.

I'm, like, ashamed or somethin'.