shereads
Sloganless
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2003
- Posts
- 19,242
KenJames said:I think you're being too modest.
I think you're right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
KenJames said:I think you're being too modest.
shereads said:
There are terrifying effects of absolute belief and absolute faith. If you want to read a genuinely chilling example of how a chosen one of God might behave - and feel absolved of any guilt because he was doing as commanded by God - read "Under the Banner of Heaven," by Jon Krakauer who wrote "Into Thin Air."
If I sound proud of being agnostic, it's not so much that as a feeling of peace in having accepted that it's okay not to know. Maybe it's better than okay, to be open to the idea that this life is an adventure whose end we won't know until we get there. It doesn't scare me, because there's no evidence that anything awaits us after death that's more horrible than what we do to each other here on earth.
Dirt Man said:In the Beginning Part II:
Regardless, Eve is seduced into eating the fruit from the Tree of knowledge of Good, and Evil, and does. Then turns around and offers it to Adam, who doesn’t even argue about it, just gulps it down because she gave it to him. Talk about dumb, Adam didn’t even have to be seduced. That’s what pussy does to a man. Makes him dumb as dog shit. Blame Eve all you want for being kicked out of the Garden of Eden, but Adam didn’t even protest, and she at least argued against it first before eating the fruit.
Dirt Man said:In the Beginning Part II:
"You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."[/I]
[/B]
sweetnpetite said:Did you ever notice, dirtman, that what the serpant said was true? God said that they would die in the day that they ate of the fruit- but they didn't die that day. They did however have there eyes open and have knowlege of good and evil.
This part throws me for a loop. It certainly seems to me that God lied, and the Serpant told the truth. Am I missing something?
Dirt Man said:God didn't lie:
Their innocence died the moment that they ate that fruit. So in a manner of speaking they did die that day. Before they ate that fruit, and disobeyed God they could have done anything they wanted to, other than eat that fruit, and it wouldn't have been a sin. And I mean anything but eat that fruit too. To them there was no good, or evil, just God, them, and the Garden of Eden. That's what innocence is all about.
The moment we are born the grave digger readies our grave. We inherited that from Adam, and Eve, they began to die the moment that they ate that fruit, and eventually they did die as we know death now.
Dirt Man said:In the Beginning Part II:
Now where was I? Oh yes, in the Beginning.
And on the 6th day of Creation, (As days are figured in heaven, not Earth), God created Man. Quite a statement really, but as everyone is now aware Man is basically made up of chemical compounds worth little to next to nothing significant which can be found in the Earth itself. Zinc, Iron, and whatever. Add some water, and breath the breath of life in him, and God had created man, a sentient being. Evolution aside, however long it took God to create Man he created him, and named him Adam. The proof of that is that we are here.
What isn't evident, or even provable is how God stepped outside of himself at that moment to become the defense attorney when Lucifer took up the position of prosecuting attorney for the Dark side as their leader in the heavenly court. Only in this manner with the best from both sides of the issue defending their positions in the heavenly court could a fair trial be held for each individual down on Earth in the great experiment. So the Way, the Truth, and the Light had to step out of himself, and still being acting Judge also take on the role of the defense attorney at the same time. In essence, on the throne, omnipresent, and also now the defense attorney. Only something that God could do, as after all he is God the Father, the son, and the Holy Ghost. Now in all fairness the son, (Also the Way, the Truth, and the Light.) with his power as defense attorney had the right to go back and forth between Earth and heaven as a witness just like Lucifer, but only for all of Mankind in this issue concerning each individual, or item about men as it is brought before the court by Lucifer to testify on behalf of the dark side's position in this issue. He couldn't bring up what he already knew was the truth about Lucifer, as that would break the agreement of the truce in heaven. (We know of this ongoing court battle from the Book of Job by the way.)
Okay, so now we have Adam in the Garden of Eden, created in the image of God, but lacking the knowledge of good, and evil, or immortality as having either of these two things would have made man equal to what had already taken place in the heavens with the Angels. And for the experiment to work at all, Mankind would have to play out every issue between the sides of darkness, and light. In as much as free will was what God needed from his companions, and also a part of the problem, man was given free will even in his sublime innocence. And the clock started ticking...
To help Adam tend a garden that needed no tending, God put Adam to sleep, and took one of Adam's ribs from him to create a woman. And Adam named her Eve. And it was then that God gave these two first human beings the very first commandment on the planet Earth. Basically, he told them that they could eat of any fruit in the garden at all, EXCEPT the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good, and Evil. As to eat the fruit from that one tree would cause them to die.
What immediately always came to my mind when reading that passage in Genesis was: "What part of die didn't they understand?" I mean they could have eaten the fruit of the tree of more common sense, or fruit from the tree of ever lasting passion, well, maybe they did eat from that one at least. In any event they may have even eaten of the tree of life for all I know, and not liked the taste so spit it out. They did live a long time after getting kicked out of the garden after all. But I digress.
And on the 7th day God did rest from all of his creating. Obviously, time had not just begun on Earth, but also up in heaven, even if not tick tocking at the same speed as we later find out in the old testament. Some equate that a day in heaven is about equal to a year of Earth's time. In any case God did rest from his creating on the 7th day. Obviously he was comfortable enough with all of what he had created thus far to take a break. And he had proclaimed everything he had created; Good, as he created each. EXCEPT: Man. It's all there in Genesis, check it out for yourself. In fact he made a point of calling each of his creations Good before he created Man. His Omniscience, and Omnipresence would not allow him to say it. He already knew the future of Mankind. Disobedient, hardheaded stubborn, and blasphemous, ignorance steep within his own intelligence, greedy, loathsome, and in general morally corrupt unto death, that was the future of mankind. So he could hardly pronounce his last creation Good already knowing the nature that mankind would inherent after eating the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good, and Evil as he already knew Adam would.
Now most theologists agree that either the serpent was Lucifer in disguise, or that Lucifer had used his powers of intervention with the serpent to end the issue right off from the start by getting the Serpent to trick Man into eating the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good, and Evil. He may have lied to the Serpent promising it something that the Serpent deemed worthy of having. Whatever the reason, or how it happened, there is no doubt the Serpent initiated the temptation, and for the side of darkness. It went something like what English Lady posted earlier on this thread:
Ok so Genesis 3 goes like this: (I use the NIV version btw)
Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, "Did God really say, 'You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?"
The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.' "
"You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
Right off you get the feeling that this is where all of those dumb blond jokes come from. Because the woman embellishes what God said by adding the word Touch to what God said. However she probably said it because she was so startled to hear an animal speaking to her for the very first time. This is why theologians believe it was Lucifer in the guise of the Serpent, but I let that lay for now. In any event since Eve hasn’t spoken the entire truth, the Serpent feels free to answer in kind here, and seduces Eve with an outright lie embellished with a dash of the truth as a reward incentive. Regardless, Eve is seduced into eating the fruit from the Tree of knowledge of Good, and Evil, and does. Then turns around and offers it to Adam, who doesn’t even argue about it, just gulps it down because she gave it to him. Talk about dumb, Adam didn’t even have to be seduced. That’s what pussy does to a man. Makes him dumb as dog shit. Blame Eve all you want for being kicked out of the Garden of Eden, but Adam didn’t even protest, and she at least argued against it first before eating the fruit.
Now of course God knew it would happen before it happened, he even knew Lucifer’s part in it. But so now did ever Angel. Which was the whole point to this experiment. I’m sure at that point that Lucifer felt the stares of every Angel at that moment. Here in a microcosm what had basically happened in heaven had just taken place in front of every Angel created. And, in as much as Lucifer had used his power to intervene, God was free to use his power of intervention with man also. What God did then must have surprised the Hell out of Lucifer.
The physical Way, the Truth, and the Light, as we know had actually talked, and walked in the Garden of Eden with both Adam and Eve up to this point. His physical presence always preceded by a special breeze that Adam had become accustomed to as God’s way of shall we say knocking before entering man’s life. Yet this time when the special breezed came there was no physical presence that followed, just God’s voice in Adam, and Eve’s head. And it sounded thunderous to them. Doctors and scientists have wondered for centuries about certain areas of the brain that don’t seem to have any function, or any significant reason for being there. Well, it has been a long time since God has spoken to any man in the manner that God spoke to Adam that day, isn’t it. But the point is, God could no longer face man in his physical form face to face at that time because man’s body after eating of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good, and Evil was corrupted unto death. (As would be all of Man’s offspring from this moment on.) So it would have instantly killed Adam to see God face to face then because Adam was no longer innocent. God could see his sin as if it were a sun shining out brightly. Even through the fig leaves.
Okay, this is the part that gets all of the animal lovers in an uproar. God immediately replaced the fig leaves on Adam, and Eve with the hides of innocent dead animals down here on Earth. At the same time up in heaven he poured out a measure of the life’s blood of the innocent animals on the two Cherubs known as Justice, and Mercy that sit before God’s throne. The same blood attached to the skins that Adam and Eve now wore in the Garden. With the innocence of the blood of those innocent animals now covering Adam, and Eve’s sin temporarily from the eyes of God, God could deal with Man thru his infinite mercy, and not strike them down dead where they stood. Snapping them out of existence and starting all over again would have given the same results anyway, and God knew this. But he’d had a plan in mind all along. One that he could only hope, against hope, would bring Lucifer, and his fallen third of the Angelic horde back into the fold, but that he knew already wouldn’t because they’d never want to see their own sins as sin at all. Still, he had to give them the same chance he was about to give all of mankind. Redemption. Well, once again I’ve gone overly long. Time to let someone else post.
As Always
I Am the
Dirt Man
Dirt Man said:
Next time, and every time after that, before you read your bible ask God for his spirit to enter you, and reveal what he will to your understanding. It's that simple. Then you will be able to make up your own mind about all of this. And that's all that God wants you to do right now.
English Lady said:
Why are so many people pulled towards believing in a higher being? Why do so many people in trouble pray and look to the intervention of something supernatural and super human? There seems to be an intrinsic need in humanity for Faith in something other than themselves because humans are flawed and to put your faith solely in humanity is to ultimately be very disappointed.
We're all still responsible for our actions. Yup its our human nature that casues us to sin. The devil might shove a bit of temptation under our noises but we are the ones who sin. We'll see all our misdeeds when we go up to Heaven(I can't remember the exact text but it's a revelations bit i think) and we will have to answer for them. The difference being that my big long list of sins will be chucked out of the window because i've accepted the gift of Jesus death and ressurection.
rgraham666 said:I liked Stephen Hawkings comeback to that line: "Not only does He play dice, He cheats."
sweetnpetite said:I was just thinking the other day that a resonable person has got to be able to realize that with all of the different beliefs and religions in the world, the odds that *their* was is the one true way are absolutly against them! And in accepting that, it would be ok to say, "I'm willing to accept that my way could be wrong, and anothers right, but I am willing to take the chance and have faith for myself that I have chosen correctly."
Wouldn't that be beautiful? They wouldn't need to kill over there beliefs, or even convert others unless they were willing to be converted. To me, I think that is what faith should be about![]()
Many of your postings don't make much sense to me. Possibly that's due to my own intellectual and theological inadequacies, or it might be that you're not as clear in your arguments as you think.Dirt Man said:I guess you just don't get it Pure, I refuse to lower myself to your standards of Name calling, Putting words in peoples mouths, and even twisting what others say to fit your outlook. So instead I just witness, and basically ignore what I think is improper. If this offends your faith I apologize. I realize this is YOUR thread after all. If you don't like my point of view, hey, that okay. It's still a free internet. But being free also means that I don't have to responde to every provocation either.
English Lady said:
Say you tell a lie..how many good deeds should you do to cover it or you murder someone..can you earn forgiveness in good deeds for that? That is why I find the the death and resurrection of Christ as our redemption as being fair....anyone can be forgiven if they believe.
I know God's spirit moved in the old testament...obviously, it just didn't come into being at pentecost. The Holy Spirit chose the Earth as a Good place for God to do his creating right back in the beginning there. The Holy Spirit came down on Jesus when he was Baptised. This all sounds like the Holy Spirit working under his own steam. I'm guessing that the anointing of the Holy Spirit at pentecost was a new thing.(Not 100% sure here) and that the Holy Spirit could reach far more people through being inside of believers and would be a helper (in fact i am sure that bit about the spirit being a helper is scriptual) to each and everyone. Like your own piece of God with you ever and always. Cool huh?
Except for the last sentence, everything you've said in this post is exactly right. You have an excellent intuitive feel for God, humanity, right and wrong.KarenAM said:Forgiveness is a noble thing and I certainly won't argue against it, though it's not always easy to do. But are good deeds and bad deeds like math? I've always seen them as existing, to some degree at least, seperately. You can try to atone for something you do wrong (and you probably should), but the idea that good and bad deeds could be balanced off against one another doesn't really make sense to me.
Certainly I've known a number of Christians who deal with their flawed and imperfect selves in the way you describe, by having the grace of Christ guide them. This is good. But as well, forgiveness and redemption are two different things, right? Forgiveness is done by the victim of wrongdoing, putting it past them (and this is why some things just can't be forgiven, like Hitler). But redemption is the return of a wrongdoer into the healthy community, which requires them to change so they won't do the wrong thing again. Have I got that right?
Also...
This idea is cool. The idea that there is a bit of God in each of us appeals to me. It fits my feelings when I write, as though creating calls upon an energy within me. It would also help explain why my Jewish, Hindu and Muslim friends talk about feeling God in their lives just as my Christian friends do. We're all human so maybe we all share this.
And I'm all for women ministers too, even though I'm not qualified to be one.![]()