Argumentum ad hominem

Bear in mind that Argumentum ad hominem is not always a fallacy:

The single most important piece of information in any message is the name of the messenger.
"1 + 1 = 2"

Wilson: "Who said that?! Who said it is the most important part!"
 
Are you a real man, George? Does your junk even work in that cancer ridden body of yours?
https://forum.literotica.com/thread...in-the-back-of-the-head.1467735/post-88518760

She probably got cancer and died. Karma is a bitch.
https://forum.literotica.com/threads/f-ck-stevie-nicks.1476501/post-89142544

What was it? Stroke? Alcoholism? Drugs? Prison stint? Cancer? I hope it was cancer.
https://forum.literotica.com/threads/cunts.1480970/post-89411132

:)
 
The thread titled "demoncreeps" obviously is a left wing thing
 
"1 + 1 = 2"

Wilson: "Who said that?! Who said it is the most important part!"
Suppose somebody brings up Holocaust revisionism. Now of course it's a legitimate topic for discussion, history is always open to correction -- but before you even begin to evaluate proffered evidence, you need to find out whether the person proferring it is the sort who wants it all to happen again, as is usually the case with Holocaust revisionists.
 
Suppose somebody brings up Holocaust revisionism. Now of course it's a legitimate topic for discussion, history is always open to correction -- but before you even begin to evaluate proffered evidence, you need to find out whether the person proferring it is the sort who wants it all to happen again, as is usually the case with Holocaust revisionists.
Suppose you're discussing revisionist history and then Wilson calls you a toad fucker. Just suppose. :)
 
Suppose somebody brings up Holocaust revisionism. Now of course it's a legitimate topic for discussion, history is always open to correction
Which means you look at the evidence and arguments on the basis of their merit.

Only absolute morons would adopt the position the merits of evidence and argument are dependent upon the messenger.
 
Anybody else getting more and more personal attacks out of the blue from angry Trump hating communists? I must be doing something right. Lol. :)
Argumentum ad hominem is basically the left’s emotional support animal. When the facts wander off and the argument collapses, they don’t follow the evidence, they attack the speaker. It’s less “debate” and more “therapy session with insults.” You’ll notice the pattern: if they can’t refute your point, they’ll diagnose you, label you, psychoanalyze your childhood, and declare you morally unclean. No rebuttal, no counter-evidence, just feelings and character assassination. It’s not that they choose ad hominem; it’s that once the script runs out, the only move left is to flip the board and call you names. In left-wing debate culture, attacking the argument is optional, attacking the person is mandatory. Rob's family crest is carved in soft wood, and right above the shield, where honor, valor, or lineage used to go, it proudly reads Argumentum ad Hominem.
 
Argumentum ad hominem is basically the left’s emotional support animal. When the facts wander off and the argument collapses, they don’t follow the evidence, they attack the speaker. It’s less “debate” and more “therapy session with insults.”
That has always been far, far more the RW than the LW way and you know it.
 
Here's one example from the good news thread:



My ass is pleasingly plump! :)


Better than boney. A boney butt is painful to sit on for long periods.

Which is prolly why skinny people never seem to sit down.
 
Better than boney. A boney butt is painful to sit on for long periods.

Which is prolly why skinny people never seem to sit down.

🙄

Jesus fuck, what the hell is wrong with Derpy???

🤔

Way for Derpy to tell everyone that Derpy has a frail "boney" (bony?) butt…

Derpy doxxing themself again…

😑

👉 Derpy 🤣

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Are we claiming ad hom is bad by doing ad hom?
 
Back
Top