Trump was impeached after leaving office.
As predicted Mexico is in for a rough time.
- Thread starter Rebel5soul
- Start date
Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 3,383
Yet another fucking moron pipes in.
Did Obama authorize a drone strike in Oman that killed a US citizen? A drone strike specifically tasked to kill said citizen without benefit of 'due process?"
Did Obama invade Pakistan with military force to kill an individual? Pakistan tacitly being a US Allie and we, the US, not having their permission to do so?
Did Trump blow the head of the Iranian Quds force to hell and gone when said leader was in Iraq as a guest of Iraq?
No one is going to do shit if push comes to shove.
You're not talking about bin Laden, are you?!
dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 3,758
No, my friend. He was impeached a second time the week before he left office. The big question was whether he could still be tried after leaving.
In the issue at hand under discussion, the individual said to call back Obama and impeach him over drone strikes. Obama was not charged before he left office, so he could not be tried, which was my statement.
Is the Constitution a bitch to understand? You'd have thought it would be easy to understand, given that most men of those days were not educated. Here we are over 250 years later, arriving at a simple truth: you can be a sex offender, a bad businessman, and a felon and still be acceptable to our nation as a 'great leader, ' making America great again as a winning slogan.
Peel six apples, add some dough, and get an American Pie.
dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 3,758
Yes, he did.
The boy, a 15-year-old US citizen, died incidental to war. His father, US Citizen also, declared alliegence against the USA. The father died a week or two before in a targeted strike. His father's friends took the boy to the second targeted site. His presence was unknown at the locale to US intelligence gathering sources: the target was another group of enemy combatants, and the kid was a casualty of war.
You know the SC just declared a President acting in his official capacity can't be tried for such acts? Trump's attempt to overthrow the goverment brought that ruling about.
You got a problem with killing Osama Ben Ladin? Mastermind of the Twin Towers murders? Pakistan said he wasn't there. No one wrote a letter to complain did they?
Hypocrite.
73Seahawks
Virgin
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2024
- Posts
- 440
Mexico agrees to accept at least four military planes containing illegal aliens.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 64,942
Mexico Rushes to Build Migrant Tent Cities in ‘Unprecedented’ Response to Trump’s Mass Deportation Plans
by The Gateway PunditJanuary 25, 2025
Mexican authorities are scrambling to build migrant tent cities as part of a response to Donald Trump’s mass deportation plans.
According to a Reuters report, the shelters currently under construction should be finished within days and will be able to house thousands of individuals deported from the United States.
https://discern.tv/mexico-rushes-to...ed-response-to-trumps-mass-deportation-plans/
They better be, millions are coming.
They're not all Mexicans, are they? Only Mexicans should be deportable to Mexico.
rainsol
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 1,251
Keep up , they will send drones!
rainsol
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 1,251
If they crossed the border, that made them mexicans....or better yet..if mexico is such a good partner why did they allow this? We know why Joe did, he needed the votes.
What votes? Immigrants don't vote until naturalized, which requires at least seven years' legal residence.
Bn2f
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2020
- Posts
- 9,034
You’re replying to something I posted over 10 days ago and you’re telling me to keep up?
. You’re the one who suffers from incurable lack of comprehension - the OP said deployment of troops, no mention of drones. Either way, dipshit, Mexico, as well as any sovereign country, can/should view any encroachment as an act of aggression. Sit da fuk down you clown.
PersonalFavors
Voyer
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2021
- Posts
- 1,498
No drone strikes in Mexico. He did provide arms to the cartels. Fast and furious. How quickly you forget.
Lance_Castro
Virgin
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2024
- Posts
- 3,088
Everything must go!
Lol
Lol
President Sheinbaum said it's OK? When?
In next week's news, Mexico will declare that the criminal cartels smuggling across the border causing death and disruption are 'terrorists' and take military action.
The troops will open fire on anyone they suspect of preparing to bring firearms into Mexico.
The troops will open fire on anyone they suspect of preparing to bring firearms into Mexico.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 39,947
Or an EO from the President.
dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 3,758
No, the president cannot unilaterally naturalize citizens through an executive order. The process of naturalization is governed by federal law, specifically the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which sets the requirements, including residency duration, good moral character, and passing a citizenship test. Only Congress has the power to change these laws.
An executive order cannot override statutory law, so while a president could direct agencies to streamline certain processes or prioritize certain applicants, they cannot grant citizenship outside the established legal framework.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 39,947
Tell it to the DACA recipients.
dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 3,758
Such a disingenuous reply, so typical and lacking context–your norm. You of all people here should know Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients are not U.S. citizens. DACA is a program that protects individuals from deportation for a set period of time, but it doesn't provide a path to citizenship.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 39,947
They might not be naturalized, but they have ALL the benefits of naturalization.
A benefit created by Obama's Executive Order fiat. One which Trump tried to end but was prevented by the courts. Courts which sided with ILLEGAL ALIENS over US law and citizens.
So, tell me again how an EO can't be used like that. I'll wait.
dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 3,758
Courts overruled Trump on the issue? Some spine showing there. My guess is they interpreted the law and found something in the felon's quest that was not lawful and ruled accordingly. You see that as bad and consequently turn to all caps letters to see over it.
No, DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) recipients do not have the same benefits as naturalized citizens. DACA was created by executive action under President Obama in 2012 and provides certain protections, but it does not grant citizenship or lawful permanent residency (a green card).
DACA was meant as a temporary measure to protect undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children, but it does not provide a path to citizenship. Congress would need to pass legislation (like the DREAM Act) to grant DACA recipients permanent legal status.
Immigration forum
Last edited:
Similar threads
