Bernie Sanders

Oh Hillary has the nomination and likely the election but you still don't throw away votes in a hissy fit.
 
BND

Thank you for your generous contribution to Bernie Sanders' campaign for president.

A successful national campaign is a massive undertaking, especially when we will be heavily outspent. It will require the active participation of millions of Americans in every community in our country.

Please like Bernie Sanders on Facebook to get the latest from the campaign: https://www.facebook.com/berniesanders

We cannot thank you enough for your contribution to this campaign. Thank you for your support.

- Team Bernie
 
"A man goes home and masturbates his typical fantasy. A woman on her knees, a woman tied up, a woman abused. A woman enjoys intercourse with her man — as she fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously." - Sanders, 1972
 
Sanders ties Clinton in Wyoming, a state with a demographic that badly favors him. This looks very bad for him going into New York. I expected him to win this state by a landslide; something similar to his win in Washington. A tie with Clinton is very bad here.
 
Sanders ties Clinton in Wyoming, a state with a demographic that badly favors him. This looks very bad for him going into New York. I expected him to win this state by a landslide; something similar to his win in Washington. A tie with Clinton is very bad here.

Wyoming is highly right wing....and thus largely favors Clinton....just like the vast majority of deep red states.

It's not that bad, because NY is highly liberal/progressive.....that's BAD for Clinton, who except for official (D) in front of her name is a NeoConservative.
 
"A man goes home and masturbates his typical fantasy. A woman on her knees, a woman tied up, a woman abused. A woman enjoys intercourse with her man — as she fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously." - Sanders, 1972

So this, to you, is more problematic than Hillary supporting Goldwater back in '64, since we're going back 40+ years now?
 
Wyoming is highly right wing....and thus largely favors Clinton....just like the vast majority of deep red states.

It's not that bad, because NY is highly liberal/progressive.....that's BAD for Clinton, who except for official (D) in front of her name is a NeoConservative.

So, I guess you're not aware that NY voted her to represent them in the U.S. Senate twice. :rolleyes:
 
So, I guess you're not aware that NY voted her to represent them in the U.S. Senate twice. :rolleyes:

To be fair, the last time a Republican won a Senatorial election in New York was 1992. By all accounts, she took the same approach to becoming a Senator that she took in '08 and now in the primaries-amass a war chest and bully out any possibly formidable competitors.
 
Wyoming is highly right wing....and thus largely favors Clinton....just like the vast majority of deep red states.

It's not that bad, because NY is highly liberal/progressive.....that's BAD for Clinton, who except for official (D) in front of her name is a NeoConservative.

Except NY is her home state where she was twice elected senator, and is:

1. A primary; primaries have favored Clinton so far, while caucuses have favored Sanders.

2. Is a closed primary, so no independents can vote. In the primaries where Sanders has beaten Clinton, they have been open primaries where independents have overwhelmingly favored Sanders. Since it's closed, Sanders can't get help from independents this time.

3. NY is the home of Wall Street. I take that they won't respond too kindly to Sanders' constantly shitting on them.

4. NY has a lot of minorities, which favors Clinton.
 
So, I guess you're not aware that NY voted her to represent them in the U.S. Senate twice. :rolleyes:

You would be guessing wrong you fart sniffing wind bag.

Except NY is her home state where she was twice elected senator, and is:

That doesn't make Wyoming a Sanders favored state nor does it change the fact that Sanders is fucking CRUSHING Clinton in every deep blue liburhul state.



She might be a NY home girl, and that just might eek her out a win, but it doesn't make her invincible.


Pretty much everyone left of center paying attention to anything fucking loathes that neocon piece of shit.

She might as well be Romney or another Bush and we all know it.
 
Last edited:
You would be guessing wrong you fart sniffing wind bag.



That doesn't make Wyoming a Sanders favored state nor does it change the fact that Sanders is fucking CRUSHING Clinton in every deep blue liburhul state.



She might be a NY home girl, and that just might eek her out a win, but it doesn't make her invincible.


Pretty much everyone left of center paying attention to anything fucking loathes that neocon piece of shit.

She might as well be Romney or another Bush and we all know it.

Yes, that's why analysts were expecting Wyoming to be 80-20 for sanders.

Also just eeking out a win in NY is pretty much enough to stop sanders in his tracks.
 
You would be guessing wrong you fart sniffing wind bag.



That doesn't make Wyoming a Sanders favored state nor does it change the fact that Sanders is fucking CRUSHING Clinton in every deep blue liburhul state.



She might be a NY home girl, and that just might eek her out a win, but it doesn't make her invincible.


Pretty much everyone left of center paying attention to anything fucking loathes that neocon piece of shit.

She might as well be Romney or another Bush and we all know it.

But he's not crushing it in blue states. Hillary won mass. for example and will take NY.
 
Yes, that's why analysts were expecting Wyoming to be 80-20 for sanders.

This shows sanders winning by over 10%....and getting 7 delegates to Clinton's 11.
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president


Also just eeking out a win in NY is pretty much enough to stop sanders in his tracks.

Her and her buddies at Goldman Sachs already bought the election for her to within an inch of legality I assure you.

Sanders never had a chance, he's about 10 years to early.

But he will be instrumental in shining a light on what a mouthpiece for the elite billionaires club Clinton is, so I hope he sticks it out and inspires some of the left to grow a spine after she sells us down the river right after getting into office EXACTLY like the last several billionaire butt lick POTUS's have and fire her slimy ass in favor of someone who gives 2 pumps of rat jizz about the non elite billionaires in this country.

But he's not crushing it in blue states. Hillary won mass. for example and will take NY.

Yea, he is.

There is some crossover, but not much.

She might take NY, but if she does it won't be by a whole lot. I don't think democrats in NY are as stupid or spinelessly terrified of progress as the democrats in the dirty south. I don't think she's going to do as well in supa liburhul states as her friends at FOX/CNN keep trying to pump her up to be.
 
Last edited:
Poll: Sanders closes gap in NY

Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders is closing the gap with front-runner Hillary Clinton in New York, according to a Emerson College poll released Friday.

Clinton leads among likely Democratic primary voters 56 percent to 38 percent in the survey. When the same poll was conducted in March, Sanders trailed the former New York senator in her home state by 48 points.

Clinton continues to do well among minority groups, with 72 percent support among African-Americans compared to the 28 percent who support the Vermont senator. Hispanics also lean her way 68 percent to 32 percent, according to the poll.

Sanders, long popular with young voters, has an edge over Clinton, with 60 percent support, among the 18-34 age group, compared to her 36 percent.

The poll comes just a few weeks before New York's April 19 primary where Sanders and Clinton will compete for the state's 95 delegates.

A RealClearPolitics polling average puts Clinton at 53.5 percent support in New York and Sanders at 42.5 percent support.

From 48 pts to 11 pts in a month? her lead is eroding fast.
 
You would be guessing wrong you fart sniffing wind bag.

Which means, I guess, that you don't even read and understand your own posts. I'm not surprised.

I'll leave the juvenile name-calling to you.
 
Which means, I guess, that you don't even read and understand your own posts. I'm not surprised.

I'll leave the juvenile name-calling to you.

Why?

Because I'm not buying the bullshit CNN/FOX's propaganda machine is cranking out??
That because she won a senate race there nearly a decade ago she's got it all buttoned up and can't ever be touched in any race by anyone in that state ever again?

LOL

You would you pompous fuckin' elitist scum bag.
 
Is there any particular reason why you think that juvenile name-calling distinguishes your posts in any way?

You posted that New York voted liberal and that Hillary was a neoconservative--ergo that she was at a disadvantage in the coming primary.

Your argument falls apart on so many premises, starting with calling her a neoconservative and, most amusingly, not taking into account that a majority of New Yorkers thought she was perfectly fine to represent them in the U.S. Senate for twelve years. But why would anyone expect a reasoned argument from you to begin with? :rolleyes:

I take it that you call folks names here and post dumb arguments because you are lonely and want someone to pay attention to you. ;)
 
Right now Hillary is ahead in delegates by 250 and there are 1736 delegates to be elected. The Supers are irrelevant at this stage, they could switch at anytime before the convention.

Bernie just needs to win by ~20% to make it about even.

Then what will the Supers do?
 
Right now Hillary is ahead in delegates by 250 and there are 1736 delegates to be elected. The Supers are irrelevant at this stage, they could switch at anytime before the convention.

Bernie just needs to win by ~20% to make it about even.

Then what will the Supers do?

if it's even, I expect the supers to go to clinton.
 
Is there any particular reason why you think that juvenile name-calling distinguishes your posts in any way?

Is there any reason you presume to think that I think it distinguishes my post other than you're presumptuous as well as pompous??

You posted that New York voted liberal and that Hillary was a neoconservative--ergo that she was at a disadvantage in the coming primary.

You need to learn how to read, or stop being an intellectually dishonest piece of shit....I won't be holding my breath for either.


Your argument falls apart on so many premises, starting with calling her a neoconservative

Really? Then what else would you call a big bankers/wall st/ megacorp 1% super rich dick sucker and fuck poor people pro war on drugs, pro life, pro death penalty type of politician?

:confused:

Certainly not progressive.

Last I checked we call them shit birds NeoCon's

I take it that you call folks names here and post dumb arguments because you are lonely and want someone to pay attention to you. ;)

There you go again, assuming wrong again.

I'm not lonely and I couldn't give 2 shits if you pay attention to me. Put me on iggy and I'll still post calling you an arrogant piece of shit elitest.

Right now Hillary is ahead in delegates by 250 and there are 1736 delegates to be elected. The Supers are irrelevant at this stage, they could switch at anytime before the convention.

Bernie just needs to win by ~20% to make it about even.

Then what will the Supers do?

Bernie would need an absolute LANDSLIDE to beat Clinton.

If there is a way for the DNC to fuck Sanders for Clinton they will do it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top