BoredDirtyCommie
Virgin
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2026
- Posts
- 943
That’s not stopping the Republicans. That's helping them. Now gerrymandering is legitimized by both parties.They just did, in Virginia and California.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s not stopping the Republicans. That's helping them. Now gerrymandering is legitimized by both parties.They just did, in Virginia and California.
It's not helping them half as much as what Democrats have usually done in the past: continue to play politely by the rules. Heck, that never even stopped people like you from saying both sides do it.That’s not stopping the Republicans. That's helping them. Now gerrymandering is legitimized by both parties.
And now we have both sides gerrymandering.It's not helping them half as much as what Democrats have usually done in the past: continue to play politely by the rules. Heck, that never even stopped people like you from saying both sides do it.
Can’t you just send your meals on wheels volunteers to help?Our friend Rob may need immediate, effective support to address his pain and sorrow about what this may mean for the Midterms. He may need help with meals and errands. Is there anyone in Houston who can help?
Considering that DeSantis is a lame duck as Florida Governor, he's going to keep upping the ante even further.Can’t you just send your meals on wheels volunteers to help?
We know you can’t get mom’s meatloaf anymore but you have stockpiled up I’m sure in the freezer.
And in Florida, spread too thin will backfire on wannabe cabinet member Ron. All of those other special elections went so well, especially in Orange’s back yard before redistricting (before thinning it out more than whatever that is on O47’s head).
They are not "drawing districts that make a point of preventing Black candidates from getting elected." That is a lie your cult tells that is based on racist assumptions. What they're doing is complying with the court's ruling that you can't create specifically racial districts. You can't design a district either to prevent a minority from getting elected or specifically to get them elected. Your lines are to be race-neutral to the fullest extent possible.We'll see if Louisiana, Alabama and other states with such a sterling record on civil rights don't go back to drawing districts that make a point of preventing Black candidates from getting elected. That, of course, was the point of this portion of the Voting Rights Act in the first place.
I never liked the feckless RINO in the first place.While we're in Houston, you might want to look into finding help saving Cornyn's Senate seat, which is in real danger of flipping to the Dems.
What the court has effectively held is that the Constitution cannot be recruited as a diversity consultant, that it does not permit the practice of discriminating against one group in the name of curing discrimination against another. In other words, it declines to endorse the curious arithmetic by which bias, when properly relabeled, is expected to add up to equality.They are not "drawing districts that make a point of preventing Black candidates from getting elected." That is a lie your cult tells that is based on racist assumptions. What they're doing is complying with the court's ruling that you can't create specifically racial districts. You can't design a district either to prevent a minority from getting elected or specifically to get them elected. Your lines are to be race-neutral to the fullest extent possible.
All they do is generate it. Wake up to their perfidy to understand reality.All you do is spew hatred of Democrats.
Never relevant...just hatred
2025All they do is generate it. Wake up to their perfidy to understand reality.
Yes, that was last year.2025
That's exactly what they did before the VRA was passed. Which is why it was passed in the first place.They are not "drawing districts that make a point of preventing Black candidates from getting elected."
What they're doing in Louisiana, and threatening to do in Alabama, is effectively designing a district to prevent a minority from getting elected. Open your eyes already.What they're doing is complying with the court's ruling that you can't create specifically racial districts. You can't design a district either to prevent a minority from getting elected or specifically to get them elected.
Yes, because using anti-white racism to create new districts is now illegal.That's exactly what they did before the VRA was passed. Which is why it was passed in the first place.
What they're doing in Louisiana, and threatening to do in Alabama, is effectively designing a district to prevent a minority from getting elected. Open your eyes already.
So now allowing a district centered on a compact geographic area where the majority of voters are Black is "anti-white racism"?Yes, because using anti-white racism to create new districts is now illegal.
They are not "drawing districts that make a point of preventing Black candidates from getting elected." That is a lie your cult tells that is based on racist assumptions.
When districts are engineered by zeroing in on voters primarily because they are Black, that’s racial sorting by another name. As Samuel Alito has noted, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 does not require the creation of majority-Black districts; it requires that voting practices not dilute minority voting power. Those are not the same thing, and treating them as interchangeable is where your argument goes off the rails.So now allowing a district centered on a compact geographic area where the majority of voters are Black is "anti-white racism"?
Eh, to be fair, your kind have always believed equal rights amount to anti-white something or other anyway.
Stop hallucinating and consider this:It's not helping them half as much as what Democrats have usually done in the past: continue to play politely by the rules. Heck, that never even stopped people like you from saying both sides do it.
You know perfectly well what's underfoot in Louisiana and Alabama is all about diluting minority voting power.When districts are engineered by zeroing in on voters primarily because they are Black, that’s racial sorting by another name. As Samuel Alito has noted, Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 does not require the creation of majority-Black districts; it requires that voting practices not dilute minority voting power. Those are not the same thing, and treating them as interchangeable is where your argument goes off the rails.
It's great that we're seeing more Black members from predominantly white districts. But in no way does that negate the reality of what they're after in Louisiana.
. . . because elections are much safer when politicians get to pick voters.That’s not stopping the Republicans. That's helping them. Now gerrymandering is legitimized by both parties.