LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Did Nancy Pelosi Commit Treason...

"The State Department was certainly aware of our traveling to Syria and our full itinerary. And there were State Department officials in every meeting that we had on this codel.

OMG...:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
cowslinger64 said:
"The State Department was certainly aware of our traveling to Syria and our full itinerary. And there were State Department officials in every meeting that we had on this codel.

OMG...:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Click to expand...

where does it say THEY APPROVED or had State OK

as NIGGER UGLY PROOF READER alleged?

NO! She and the others in the delegation had State Department okay.
 
Busch was upset, but that doesn't mean he said it was illegal, since, well, one of his agencies said it was KOSHER!
 
So what we have here is

NIGGER UGLY PROOF READER and NIGGER MULLAH CowAsshole argue about the definition of what is OK and what it means to KNOW about and IGNORE

TREASON
Busybody said:
TREASON!

How Barack Obama Undercut Bush Administration’s Nuclear Negotiations With Iran



In 2008, the Bush administration, along with the “six powers,” was negotiating with Iran concerning that country’s nuclear arms program. The Bush administration’s objective was to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. On July 20, 2008, the New York Times headlined: “Nuclear Talks With Iran End in a Deadlock.” What caused the talks to founder? The Times explained:


Iran responded with a written document that failed to address the main issue: international demands that it stop enriching uranium. And Iranian diplomats reiterated before the talks that they considered the issue nonnegotiable.

The Iranians held firm to their position, perhaps because they knew that help was on the way, in the form of a new president. Barack Obama had clinched the Democratic nomination on June 3. At some point either before or after that date, but prior to the election, he secretly let the Iranians know that he would be much easier to bargain with than President Bush. Michael Ledeen reported the story last year:


During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Mr. Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran to assure the mullahs that he was a friend of the Islamic Republic, and that they would be very happy with his policies. The secret channel was Ambassador William G. Miller, who served in Iran during the shah’s rule, as chief of staff for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and as ambassador to Ukraine. Ambassador Miller has confirmed to me his conversations with Iranian leaders during the 2008 campaign.

So Obama secretly told the mullahs not to make a deal until he assumed the presidency, when they would be able to make a better agreement. Which is exactly what happened: Obama abandoned the requirement that Iran stop enriching uranium, so that Iran’s nuclear program has sped ahead over the months and years that negotiations have dragged on. When an interim agreement in the form of a “Joint Plan of Action” was announced in late 2013, Iran’s leaders exulted in the fact that the West had acknowledged its right to continue its uranium enrichment program:


“The (nuclear) program will continue and all the sanctions and violations against the Iranian nation under the pretext of the nuclear program will be removed gradually,” [Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif] added. …

“Iran’s enrichment program has been recognized both in the first step and in the goals section and in the final step as well,” Zarif said.

“The fact that all these pressures have failed to cease Iran’s enrichment program is a very important success for the Iranian nation’s resistance,” he added.

So Obama delivered the weak agreement that he had secretly promised the mullahs.

In view of these events, it is deeply ironic that the Democrats are accusing 47 Republican senators of undermining Obama’s position in the negotiations for a final agreement. Unlike Obama, they have done nothing in secret. They have published an “open letter” that is intended for the Obama administration and the American people as much as for Iran’s leaders. The letter spells out basic truths relating to our Constitution and the Senate’s role in ratifying treaties. Unlike Obama’s secret overture to Iran, the GOP senators aren’t discouraging Iran from dealing with Obama so that they can get a better deal later. On the contrary, their letter strengthens Obama’s bargaining position. He can say, “Even if I wanted to, I can’t give in on nuclear enrichment. It would never get through the Senate.” But of course, that isn’t what Obama wants to do. He wants to agree to a weak deal that will allow Iran to become a nuclear power. The Democrats are upset because the senators’ letter shines the light of truth on the Obama administration’s plan to give away the store.
Click to expand...
 
cowslinger64 said:
"The State Department was certainly aware of our traveling to Syria and our full itinerary. And there were State Department officials in every meeting that we had on this codel.

OMG...:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Click to expand...

The truth to him and his buddies is like holy water to a vampire: It burns!
 
lol...here's his post of a few minutes ago


had State Department okay.

is NOT the same as State knew

and Bushco objected....but we all know YOU NIGGERS stick together


Now he claims they didn't have ok.


Dude....prozac can be your friend
 
cowslinger64 said:
lol...here's his post of a few minutes ago


had State Department okay.

is NOT the same as State knew

and Bushco objected....but we all know YOU NIGGERS stick together


Now he claims they didn't have ok.


Dude....prozac can be your friend
Click to expand...

jackass, NIGGER....the highlighted was a quote form your fellow NIGGER
 
I'm not playing semantics with you dummy....



and I notice vette still hasn't addressed being incorrect about what the title of this thread says the discussion is.
 
cowslinger64 said:
I'm not playing semantics with you dummy....



and I notice vette still hasn't addressed being incorrect about what the title of this thread says the discussion is.
Click to expand...

show me where STATE gave the OK

axe you fellow NIGGER to show you since he said they did so he must know
 
vetteman said:
They will if it requires lifting sanctions imposed by Congress, or if it requires an expenditure of taxpayer money.
Click to expand...

Then you could (but probably won't) hold off on your tizzy fit--because it wouldn't "require" any of that under those circumstances. Nothing done at the UN is binding on a nation member. It all has to be enacted under that country's own processes.

And to the inevitable and naive "what use is the UN then?" I'll note the usefulness of having a link of all these places in one place where quick, private contact can been made is worth the whole cost/commitment of belonging to it. All the voting functions are for the purpose of moral suasion, which also is more valuable to have than not.
 
cowslinger64 said:
LOL....sure looks like it to me.


I really would like to refuse to believe anyone could be as stupid as bizzydummy... but I don't think I can. Surely he's just a made up troll, right? I'm so torn.
Click to expand...

so you also cant show me STATE DEPT OK as asserted by fellow NIGGER?
 
sr71plt said:
Then you could (but probably won't) hold off on your tizzy fit--because it wouldn't "require" any of that under those circumstances. Nothing done at the UN is binding on a nation member. It all has to be enacted under that country's own processes.

And to the inevitable and naive "what use is the UN then?" I'll note the usefulness of having a link of all these places in one place where quick, private contact can been made is worth the whole cost/commitment of belonging to it. All the voting functions are for the purpose of moral suasion, which also is more valuable to have than not.
Click to expand...

did you get hit by a prop a few times?:rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Nancy Pelosi Federal Building For sale
Replies
4
Views
191
ll74
ll74
L
Luigi Mangione and Nancy Pelosi: The dirty connection
Replies
1
Views
159
Bn2f
Bn2f
eric_erosfan
Where Did ______ Go?
Replies
4
Views
61
ll74
ll74
L
Cunt fight! PussyPelosi vs AO Cunt.....Hope they both lose
Replies
16
Views
467
glamorilla
glamorilla
P
Trump doubles down on "enemies within"
2 3 4
Replies
94
Views
2K
dmallord
dmallord
Back
Top