Did Nancy Pelosi Commit Treason...

[unregistered]

 

[cowslinger64]

Fuck you, drop dead...by the numbers.

I knew you'd go there. We shoulda just started there.

Next time you start a thread just say that whatever you say is the truth, that you will not be taking questions seriously, not basing anything on fact. You'll be combative, snotty and delusional. And if the heat gets too hot, you'll run away.

That's your MO.

 

[unregistered]

 

[cowslinger64]

Just stay out of my threads, that way you won't have to bother with hearing your belief system is based on superstition and half truth. You need to lobby for a Low Information Gathering Forum, for you and your kind.

Fuck you...I'll go wherever I wish. Pussy.


Stop posting stupid shit and perhaps you won't be treated like a total tool.

Still never answered the question about this, another one of your fucked in the head threads


Where's your boyfriend Piles at?

 

[Busybody]

DemohCRAPS always sides with the enemy


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B_9-DhAWYAAp7X_.png

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

What stupid shit?

don't axe tough questions

 

[unregistered]

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

What stupid shit?

Pretty much pick any one of your threads at random. The chances are more than 90% that you're shown to be completely full of shit before it hits page 2 unless the first page is a circle jerk love fest of the usual suspects.

 

[Busybody]

Pretty much pick any one of your threads at random. The chances are more than 90% that you're shown to be completely full of shit before it hits page 2 unless the first page is a circle jerk love fest of the usual suspects.

speaking of shit, NIGGER Yoo Deee

http://forum.literotica.com/search.php?searchid=62325647

 

[cowslinger64]

Pretty much pick any one of your threads at random. The chances are more than 90% that you're shown to be completely full of shit before it hits page 2 unless the first page is a circle jerk love fest of the usual suspects.

Exactly.

 

[unregistered]

 

[KingOrfeo]

So pick one.

This one. Your position was destroyed in post #4.

 

[unregistered]

 

[cowslinger64]

When liberals want to accuse 47 Republican Senators of treason for writing a letter to Iran, they're going to get reminded of their own actions in the past.

What about Kennedy or the other five times Democrats tried to undermine a Republican President?

Actually the Bush White House strongly opposed her trip, she went anyway to negotiate on behalf of the U.S. and Israel, and both countries rejected what she finally came back and presented. Those are the facts.

First off dummy, I didn't have a "position," I asked a rhetorical question. The President cannot order the Speaker not to take a trip, just like Obama cannot tell Tom Cotton he can't send a letter to Iran. Liberals said he committed treason when he did, so I asked if Nancy Pelosi committed treason when she clearly attempted to undermine Bush's foreign policy by personally negotiating with Assad. The butthead answer in post #6 in no way answers my rhetorical question, nor does it address the other instances of alleged treason (by liberal standards) I listed either.

So your statement above, as with most of your statements, is all fucked up like Hogan's Goat.

Yeah.. You were juuuust trying to have some fun and ask another of your wonderfully unbiased, thought provoking questions.

This is what qualifies as stupid shit.

 

[KingOrfeo]

First off dummy, I didn't have a "position," I asked a rhetorical question.

That is a lie.

 

[about_average]

First off dummy, I didn't have a "position," I asked a rhetorical question.

You need to look up the meaning of "rhetorical question."

 

[unregistered]

 

[Wrong Element]

Get real, read the Constitution. There is a separation of powers, Congress cannot have it's own foreign policy. The Logan Act has been around since 1799 and was revised in 1994.

Well damn, I'm convinced.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

This is true, but it doesn't apply to the Republican letter as it contains no negotiable terms, unlike the trip of Pelosi in Syria, the actions of Speaker Jim Wright and his "Dear Commandante" letter to Danial Otega, or the conspiracy of Ted Kennedy with the Soviet Union in influencing the 1984 election against Reagan.

Why no mention of Senator Richard Nixon's interference with the Paris Peace Talks in the fall of October 1968? When then-President Lyndon Johnson thought he had a deal that could end the Vietnam War, or at least speed the U.S. departure from Vietnam. Nixon convinced the South Vietnamese government to wait for him to get them a better deal after he was elected President.

His sabotage of the Paris Peace Talks should have landed him in prison before he was ever elected.

 

[unregistered]

 

[cowslinger64]

What a dumb bastard, Nixon resigned from the Senate in 1953.

So that nullifies what he did?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...-letter-doesnt-rise-to-nixons-level/24695093/

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

What a dumb bastard, Nixon resigned from the Senate in 1953.

So because he was no longer a Senator his interference in negotiations with a foreign government in wartime shouldn't have landed his crooked ass in prison?

Are you putting yourself on record as saying that it's ok for a presidential candidate to interfere in international negotiations in wartime to better their chances of getting elected?

Because that was Nixon's strategy, Undermine the sitting President to get the support of the South Vietnamese government in much the same way the current batch of GOP Congressmen are doing with Israeli P.M. Netanyahu.

 

[miles]

What a dumb bastard, Nixon resigned from the Senate in 1953.

"Senator Nixon"

LMAO!

Go play with your action figures, UD.