DonOld is a Loser

Trump-backed Alaska Republican withdraws from US House race after third-place finish in primary

Alaska Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom, a Republican backed by former President Donald Trump, withdrew from the race for the state’s lone seat in the U.S. House on Friday after finishing third in this week’s primary.

Her decision left second-place finisher Republican Nick Begich as the main challenger to Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola, who is the first Alaska Native to serve in Congress.

Under Alaska’s open primary system, voters were asked to pick one candidate, with the top four vote-getters in the race, regardless of party affiliation, advancing to the ranked choice general election.
 
‘rump made $300k off of God’s book
Pure profit! Jesus would so approve !!
With Melanie do as well?
Here’s a link so you MAGA folk can line the cult couple’s pockets more
Maybe, if she does well enough, she will leave his ass!
 
Last edited:
The guy who trump had to have killed is voting for America.

View attachment 2381976

I expected Pence to stay on the sidelines.

It seems the traditional Republicans are all in for Harris / Walz.

👍

Ironically, there was always a place for reasonable Christians in the Democratic Party.

If Christian Republicans like Pence can stick to their professed principles of fairness, empathy, compassion, and sharing when it comes to economic and social issues, and “mind their own damn business” when it comes to other private citizens decisions about their bodies and their families, then their voices would be more than welcome in the Democratic Party that I identify with.

👍

🇺🇸
 
Last edited:
I expected Pence to stay on the sidelines.

It seems the traditional Republicans are all in for Harris / Walz.
Will Shrub and the family come out for Harris? He's got a thing for MO anyways.


That might be a thing. If all former Presidents of either party came out against one other.
 
Is it like the rest of the things he has “bought”? Really IOUs instead.

https://kfoxtv.com/amp/news/local/t...-500k-for-2019-rally-other-cities-also-unpaid

https://www.tucsonsentinel.com/loca...t-still-owes-city-tucson-82k-from-2016-rally/

https://dailymontanan.com/2024/08/0...own-he-brings-excitement-leaves-unpaid-bills/

And those are just the tip of the iceberg. Perhaps he really hasn’t paid for the rights.., just says he has… (seems like his MO his whole life… why pay for things when you can just stiff people… what an Idol you have have!)
 
🙄

Sorry, Derpy.

The band did NOT give its PERSONAL permission to the rapey, racist, misogynistic, corrupt orange traitor’s campaign to use their song.

If someone from the Trump campaign had called the band and asked for their blessing to use the song, the answer would have been:

“No” and “Let us be clear”

😑

Hope that ^ helps.

👍

👉 Derpy 🤣

🇺🇸

Lol, if trump purchased a license from one of the licensing companies, (BMI, Sony, ASCAP, etc) then he doesn't need the band's specific permission because their contract with their music publisher includes the licensing.

So, YOU LOSE AGAIN.
 
Is it like the rest of the things he has “bought”? Really IOUs instead.

https://kfoxtv.com/amp/news/local/t...-500k-for-2019-rally-other-cities-also-unpaid

https://www.tucsonsentinel.com/loca...t-still-owes-city-tucson-82k-from-2016-rally/

https://dailymontanan.com/2024/08/0...own-he-brings-excitement-leaves-unpaid-bills/

And those are just the tip of the iceberg. Perhaps he really hasn’t paid for the rights.., just says he has… (seems like his MO his whole life… why pay for things when you can just stiff people… what an Idol you have have!)

Perhaps... IOU's...

More of your fantasy that you've got him now.
 
Lol, if trump purchased a license from one of the licensing companies, (BMI, Sony, ASCAP, etc) then he doesn't need the band's specific permission because their contract with their music publisher includes the licensing.

So, YOU LOSE AGAIN.

🙄

Sorry, Derpy, but “doesn’t need the band’s specific permission” does NOT equal “got permission” from the band.

So, DERPY LOSES AGAIN.

😑

👉 Derpy 🤣

🇺🇸
 
Lol, if trump purchased a license from one of the licensing companies, (BMI, Sony, ASCAP, etc) then he doesn't need the band's specific permission because their contract with their music publisher includes the licensing.

So, YOU LOSE AGAIN.
Did he actually pay for it? That’s the question. Seems he hasn’t paid his bills in rally sites all over this great nation… and did he buy the rights once and then let the rights lapse?

Legit accounting seems to be an issue with his whole organization. Seems they have been in trouble multiple times…
 
A LOSER with a plan to lose............ but WIN........
and then?
They are fucking serious. The more they deny it? The more we should be SURE that they are ready to make sure they get their way this time!

He already launched his own nameless badge less THUGS on protestors in Washington.
No one knew who they were, but they cleared his space for his Bible picture.
Project 2025 is a reactionary wish list. It is what the most retrograde section of the GOP has wanted to do since the New Deal.
 
🙄

Sorry, Derpy, but “doesn’t need the band’s specific permission” does NOT equal “got permission” from the band.

So, DERPY LOSES AGAIN.

😑

👉 Derpy 🤣

🇺🇸

Under the licensing contract, the band must relinquish those rights. If it retains them there could be no licensing agreement through a 3rd party.
 
Still on the music ramblings?

Suggestion. Music contracts specifically EXCLUDE all political campaigns, events and rallies of all types. No 'DJ' or other arranger could use any song at any political event without EXPRESS prior approval of the artist or their estate.
 
Still on the music ramblings?

Suggestion. Music contracts specifically EXCLUDE all political campaigns, events and rallies of all types. No 'DJ' or other arranger could use any song at any political event without EXPRESS prior approval of the artist or their estate.
.
That's not how it works and it cannot be done as a "suggestion" either.

If you have a marketable product, and you have a producer for that product, you sign a contract giving your producer EXCLUSIVE CONTROL over your product. The producer, being in the business of production, can sign a contract with a licensing agency to promote/license/etc the product.

IF that license requires that the licensee go back to the original creator of the product to get "permission" then the license isn't worth anything because why would anyone PAY for what they can get if they just ask for it?

It also violates the contract between the originator and the producer because it means the producer doesn't have exclusive control over the product.

What you want is to prevent TRUMP from having the ability to play music at his rallies. Not "candidates" or "politicians," you're aiming this specifically at Trump. And you're doing it out of spite and hate.

That's not cool. Worse, you know it's not cool but don't care because it's about Trump. Again, not cool.

In the end, it's now known that Trump purchased a license. That license gives him the right to play the music if he pays a royalty. No one can stop him and attempting to do so is a tort called interference with business relations. For which Trump can collect damages.
 
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2024/08/27/trump-harris-budget-deficit-economy-election.html

KEY POINTS
  • Republican Donald Trump's economic proposals would increase federal deficits by almost five times more over the next decade than those of Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris, per two reports by the Penn Wharton Budget Model.
  • Harris has proposed raising corporate taxes to pay for her plan while Trump has put forward a hardline tariff policy on all imports, including higher rates for China.
  • The Trump and Harris campaigns are in a race to paint the other side as an economic danger, each trying to win over voters fatigued by the higher cost of living.
 
Back
Top