pointless
¿por qué no?
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 58,994
If course he did. It's kind of funny that he is keeping this fiction up. But whatever, he's still the guy who paid for sex with a can of corn.![]()
and left the board because of russian trolls.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If course he did. It's kind of funny that he is keeping this fiction up. But whatever, he's still the guy who paid for sex with a can of corn.![]()
If course he did. It's kind of funny that he is keeping this fiction up. But whatever, he's still the guy who paid for sex with a can of corn.![]()
and left the board because of russian trolls.
Joe Biden has no business in the White House. He's mentally flawed and uninformed. When the Constitution was ratified private citizens and store keepers did own cannons. There were no such gun controls at the federal level. Before the National firearms Act of 1934 a private citizen could and did buy fully automatic weapons. Even today hundreds of citizens own and operate fully automatic weapons, and artillery pieces.
For example, a private citizen can lawfully own a machine gun only if:
the possessor isn’t a “prohibited person,”
the full-auto machine gun was made before 1986, and
their relevant state law does not ban the firearm (whether banning machine guns outright or any firearm with certain features).
Biden Ripped For ‘Threatening To Nuke Law-Abiding American Citizens’: He’s ‘Literally Recording NRA Ads’
By Daily Wire News
•
Jun 23, 2021 DailyWire.com
•
President Joe Biden faced intense backlash online following remarks that he made during a press conference on Wednesday about how Americans who own firearms to defend against tyranny would need to own advanced military-grade technology to take on the U.S. government.
“The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own,” Biden said. “You couldn’t buy a cannon. [Those who] say the blood of the, the blood of patriots, you know, and all this stuff about how we’re going to have to move against the government.”
“Well, the tree of liberty is not [watered with] the blood of patriots, what’s happened is that there never been, if you want, if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons,” Biden continued. “The point is that there’s always been the ability to limit, rationally limit, the type of weapon that can be owned, and who can own it.”
More here:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/hand...that-counter-democrat-narrative-of-jan-6-riot
I thought it was his fear of ISIS.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah

I studied the actual history. I don't need to hear your partisan interpretation of known events. Here is the truth. Nixon ordered the B-52 bombing of Hanoi and Haiphong it was savage. . . .
And you'll never meet a Vietnamese, not even one living in America, who wishes the war had ended differently, or that the SV government had survived. Brutal as it was, the NV conquest of the south was in the long run the best thing that could have happened.
Oh, and, in answer to the OP, no, Biden did not threaten gun owners with nukes.
At most, he pointed out the obvious fact that privately owned firearms are politically useless.
It's not an obvious fact, it's an authoritarian fantasy.
What's really politically useless???
F-15's and nukes.
That doesn't make rifles and handguns any more useful.
You can't use them to fight the police or the National Guard or the ATF, not with any hope of victory.
The most you can hope for is the Cliven Bundy thing, which can only be called a success because it ended in a standoff because the Feds did not want to shed blood -- but if it had come to that, they wouldn't have gotten their hair mussed, and Bundy's supporters would have been wiped out.
Now try it against an organized group of trained fighters with a purpose.
That is a WILDLY different ball game.
No militia club or similar organization in America could field such a force, not even if it's all-veteran.
Just goes to show you, it's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.
Your kind had your chance on January 6th, and you blew it. No backsies.You are ignoring history and current reality.
So then why does the military dedicate so much time, money and effort into training it's very best in special units to do exactly that??
A couple of crazies yea.
Now try it against an organized group of trained fighters with a purpose.
That is a WILDLY different ball game.
So you think America's best with all the resources of the 1st world, doesn't stand a chance of doing what a bunch of 3rd world goat headers with AK's did to our military??
LOL
1) you genuinely think every veteran out there is a blob of Jell-O.
or
2) you REALLY have no fucking clue what you're talking about.
Good analogy, seeing as how you tucked tail in the infantry and ran from a combat zone.

Your kind had your chance on January 6th, and you blew it. No backsies.
I've seen stories about the militias. What they are is disturbing. What they are not is impressive.
They have nothing in place to support a sustained conflict. Any county sheriff's department could handle them.

Oh, and, in answer to the OP, no, Biden did not threaten gun owners with nukes.
At most, he pointed out the obvious fact that privately owned firearms are politically useless.
I've seen stories about the militias. What they are is disturbing. What they are not is impressive. They have nothing in place to support a sustained conflict. Any county sheriff's department could handle them.
Only under the false assumption that the volunteer military is going to turn on its peers.
Quit assuming that the only militias are on the right...
Have you never heard of guerrilla warfare?
