Dud Biden Threaten Gun Owners With Nukes?

If course he did. It's kind of funny that he is keeping this fiction up. But whatever, he's still the guy who paid for sex with a can of corn. :D

^^^
Like Luk, a deranged liar who likes to apply meaningless parables to people he doesn't know, but imagines knowing.:rolleyes:
 
Joe Biden has no business in the White House. He's mentally flawed and uninformed. When the Constitution was ratified private citizens and store keepers did own cannons. There were no such gun controls at the federal level. Before the National firearms Act of 1934 a private citizen could and did buy fully automatic weapons. Even today hundreds of citizens own and operate fully automatic weapons, and artillery pieces.

For example, a private citizen can lawfully own a machine gun only if:

the possessor isn’t a “prohibited person,”
the full-auto machine gun was made before 1986, and
their relevant state law does not ban the firearm (whether banning machine guns outright or any firearm with certain features).


Biden Ripped For ‘Threatening To Nuke Law-Abiding American Citizens’: He’s ‘Literally Recording NRA Ads’
By Daily Wire News

Jun 23, 2021 DailyWire.com

President Joe Biden faced intense backlash online following remarks that he made during a press conference on Wednesday about how Americans who own firearms to defend against tyranny would need to own advanced military-grade technology to take on the U.S. government.

“The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own,” Biden said. “You couldn’t buy a cannon. [Those who] say the blood of the, the blood of patriots, you know, and all this stuff about how we’re going to have to move against the government.”

“Well, the tree of liberty is not [watered with] the blood of patriots, what’s happened is that there never been, if you want, if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons,” Biden continued. “The point is that there’s always been the ability to limit, rationally limit, the type of weapon that can be owned, and who can own it.”

More here:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/hand...that-counter-democrat-narrative-of-jan-6-riot

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah
 
Oh, and, in answer to the OP, no, Biden did not threaten gun owners with nukes.

At most, he pointed out the obvious fact that privately owned firearms are politically useless.
 
I studied the actual history. I don't need to hear your partisan interpretation of known events. Here is the truth. Nixon ordered the B-52 bombing of Hanoi and Haiphong it was savage. . . .

All of that happened after Nixon scuttled the peace talks in '68. And then the U.S. pulled out in '74 on the same terms it would have gotten in '68 -- even more lives were lost and nothing was gained.

There is perhaps a plausible alternate-history scenario in which public opinion in America did not turn against the war -- but there is not one in which the U.S. won it. That was never possible.

And in hindsight, it wasn't even a war worth fighting. The "domino theory" never manifested, and the West won the Cold War anyway.

And you'll never meet a Vietnamese, not even one living in America, who wishes the war had ended differently, or that the SV government had survived. Brutal as it was, the NV conquest of the south was in the long run the best thing that could have happened.
 
Last edited:
And you'll never meet a Vietnamese, not even one living in America, who wishes the war had ended differently, or that the SV government had survived. Brutal as it was, the NV conquest of the south was in the long run the best thing that could have happened.

1) That's a lie....lots of Vietnamese living in the US, like many Koreans and Cubans are not at all fans of that wonderful "progress" that destroyed/divided their country and killed so many of their people.

2) No....it wasn't, that's why it looks the way it does instead of another Korea.
 
Oh, and, in answer to the OP, no, Biden did not threaten gun owners with nukes.

At most, he pointed out the obvious fact that privately owned firearms are politically useless.

It's not an obvious fact, it's an authoritarian fantasy.

What's really politically useless???

F-15's and nukes.
 
It's not an obvious fact, it's an authoritarian fantasy.

What's really politically useless???

F-15's and nukes.

That doesn't make rifles and handguns any more useful. You can't use them to fight the police or the National Guard or the ATF, not with any hope of victory. The most you can hope for is the Cliven Bundy thing, which can only be called a success because it ended in a standoff because the Feds did not want to shed blood -- but if it had come to that, they wouldn't have gotten their hair mussed, and Bundy's supporters would have been wiped out.
 
Last edited:
Biggayboomer and klanguide showcasing just how retarded they are. Poor dumb old bastards. Lol
 
That doesn't make rifles and handguns any more useful.

You are ignoring history and current reality.

You can't use them to fight the police or the National Guard or the ATF, not with any hope of victory.

So then why does the military dedicate so much time, money and effort into training it's very best in special units to do exactly that??

The most you can hope for is the Cliven Bundy thing, which can only be called a success because it ended in a standoff because the Feds did not want to shed blood -- but if it had come to that, they wouldn't have gotten their hair mussed, and Bundy's supporters would have been wiped out.

A couple of crazies yea.

Now try it against an organized group of trained fighters with a purpose.

That is a WILDLY different ball game.
 
Now try it against an organized group of trained fighters with a purpose.

That is a WILDLY different ball game.

No militia club or similar organization in America could field such a force, not even if it's all-veteran.
 
No militia club or similar organization in America could field such a force, not even if it's all-veteran.

So you think America's best with all the resources of the 1st world, doesn't stand a chance of doing what a bunch of 3rd world goat headers with AK's did to our military??

LOL

1) you genuinely think every veteran out there is a blob of Jell-O.

or

2) you REALLY have no fucking clue what you're talking about.
 
You are ignoring history and current reality.



So then why does the military dedicate so much time, money and effort into training it's very best in special units to do exactly that??



A couple of crazies yea.

Now try it against an organized group of trained fighters with a purpose.

That is a WILDLY different ball game.
Your kind had your chance on January 6th, and you blew it. No backsies.
 
So you think America's best with all the resources of the 1st world, doesn't stand a chance of doing what a bunch of 3rd world goat headers with AK's did to our military??

LOL

1) you genuinely think every veteran out there is a blob of Jell-O.

or

2) you REALLY have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

I've seen stories about the militias. What they are is disturbing. What they are not is impressive. They have nothing in place to support a sustained conflict. Any county sheriff's department could handle them.
 
Your kind had your chance on January 6th, and you blew it. No backsies.

Chance at what??

A mild and mostly peaceful protest??

LOL....That was more like the Bundy thing than what I'm talking about.

I've seen stories about the militias. What they are is disturbing. What they are not is impressive.

So you've read the propaganda rags and got the fear....

They have nothing in place to support a sustained conflict. Any county sheriff's department could handle them.

And there is the ignorance....our military couldn't handle them, but any sheriff could???

Man we should start deploying our Sheriffs to win wars!! :D

Thanks for confirming you have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Oh, and, in answer to the OP, no, Biden did not threaten gun owners with nukes.

At most, he pointed out the obvious fact that privately owned firearms are politically useless.

Only under the false assumption that the volunteer military is going to turn on its peers.
 
I've seen stories about the militias. What they are is disturbing. What they are not is impressive. They have nothing in place to support a sustained conflict. Any county sheriff's department could handle them.

Quit assuming that the only militias are on the right...



Have you never heard of guerrilla warfare?
 
Only under the false assumption that the volunteer military is going to turn on its peers.

Have you seen the brainwashing job on some of these kids???

How much they absolutely fucking hate the US and it's people more than ANY OTHER??

Plenty would gladly turn on their peer and mow them down with glee....they're deplorables anyhow!!

Quit assuming that the only militias are on the right...



Have you never heard of guerrilla warfare?

But that's not possible!!! The left is just wonderful....nothing but rainbow gum drops and laughing children in the socialist paradise!!!:D
 
Back
Top