Dud Biden Threaten Gun Owners With Nukes?

Chance at what??

A mild and mostly peaceful protest??

LOL....That was more like the Bundy thing than what I'm talking about.



So you've read the propaganda rags and got the fear....



And there is the ignorance....our military couldn't handle them, but any sheriff could???

Man we should start deploying our Sheriffs to win wars!! :D

Thanks for confirming you have no idea what you're talking about.
So many questions. Why do you suppose that you have such trouble understanding my posts?
 
So many questions. Why do you suppose that you have such trouble understanding my posts?

Because you're terrible at articulating anything close to a coherent post and have the written communication skills of a beagle.

That's not a supposition either.
 
Because you're terrible at articulating anything close to a coherent post and have the written communication skills of a beagle.

That's not a supposition either.

You were just very unkind to Beagles.
They are very intelligent...



;) ;)
 
This is the dumbest thread I've ever seen on Lit.

Well done, Vette!

It’s actually kind of fascinating the things he says about Biden after being all in for trump. Like he’s got the self-awareness of a stump.
 
OK, I’ll explain my previous post. You want weapons in order to overthrow the government. You had the chance, the will, the leadership, the party all willing. You tried on January 6th, and failed.
 
Dear trumptards, you lost, get over it.

Biden won and never said he would use nukes on americans. You are ignorant sore losers. :)
 
Everything you described happened after '68.

What I said accurately describes the cause of the debacle in Vietnam. The left likes to lie about their responsibility for the failure in Vietnam and the war they started. The unreconcilable waste of American lives is unforgiveable. We could have executed 58,000 Americans and accomplished the same thing.
 
What I said accurately describes the cause of the debacle in Vietnam. The left likes to lie about their responsibility for the failure in Vietnam and the war they started.

The Democrats started it (more or less -- it was Eisenhower to begin with), but they were not part of "the left." There really was an American left in those days, but it was something separate, and itself not monolithic. (The American Socialist Party, traditionally anti-Soviet and zealous for the Cold War, broke up in 1972 over whether to oppose or support the Vietnam War.)

But my point remains: There is no plausible AH scenario in which the U.S. wins that war -- and in hindsight it was not even a war worth fighting. Eisenhower might just as well have let them have the all-Vietnam elections the Geneva Accords promised, even if it was certain Ho Chi Minh would win.
 
Last edited:
The Democrats started it (more or less -- it was Eisenhower to begin with), but they were not part of "the left." There really was an American left in those days, but it was something separate, and itself not monolithic. (The American Socialist Party, traditionally anti-Soviet and zealous for the Cold War, broke up in 1972 over whether to oppose or support the Vietnam War.)

But my point remains: There is no plausible AH scenario in which the U.S. wins that war -- and in hindsight it was not even a war worth fighting. Eisenhower might just as well have let them have the all-Vietnam elections the Geneva Accords promised, even if it was certain Ho Chi Minh would win.

That's because you're ignorant. They surrendered when they signed the Paris Accords. There's no way they could have survived another massive bombing raid on Hanoi and Haiphong, They expended all of their SAMs and would have been defenseless against another B-52 raid. They had already suffered more than a million war dead. That's why they came to Paris. All else is left wing propaganda and Democrat bullshit.
 
Back
Top