Endless Curiosity

Sex. A question for the newer centuries. Do you prefer the lights on or off? Why?

They both have their charms.

Soft lighting or natural daylight ~ I like to see. I like to see my lover's body, I like to see what he's doing to mine, I like to see our bodies moving together (especially penetration). I like to watch his face, how he responds to my touch. I like to see him looking at my body, and i like to open my eyes and find that he's been watching me.

Deep and dark ~ I like to hear, without being distracted by visuals. I want to hear his breathing, his grunting, his swearing, his saying my name. I want to hear the sounds that bodies make - slapping, thudding, squelching sounds. The mucky noises that happen after somebody's come and you keep fucking, the ones that sound like eating a banana with your mouth open. I like learning his body by touch, reaching a hand down between us to feel his wet cock sliding in and out of me. Putting my fingers in his mouth when we kiss, feeling his lips, his tongue, his teeth nibbling my nail beds. I like hearing him suck in his breath when I put a finger or a tongue-tip just there, or when I brush my hair or a dangling nipple over his skin. And I like not knowing what he'll do to me next, where he'll touch me with hands or lips or tongue or cock.

I'm good with both.
 
Last edited:
They both have their charms.

Soft lighting or natural daylight ~ I like to see. I like to see my lover's body, I like to see what he's doing to mine, I like to see our bodies together (especially penetration). I like to watch his face, how he responds to my touch. I like to see him looking at my body, and i like to open my eyes and find that he's been watching me.

Deep and dark ~ I like to hear, without being distracted by visuals. I want to hear his breathing, his grunting, his swearing, his saying my name. I want to hear the sounds that bodies make - slapping, thudding, squelching sounds. The mucky noises that happen after somebody's come and you keep fucking, the ones that sound like eating a banana with your mouth open. I like learning his body by touch, reaching a hand down between us to feel his wet cock sliding in and out of me. Putting my fingers in his mouth when we kiss, feeling his lips, his tongue, his teeth nibbling my nail beds. I like hearing him suck in his breath when I put a finger or a tongue-tip just there, or when I brush my hair or a dangling nipple over his skin. And I like not knowing what he'll do to me next, where he'll touch me with hands or lips or tongue or cock.

I'm good with both.

Excellent description; its so nice when a dame will actually tell you what gets her going to orgasm.
 
Sex. A question for the newer centuries. Do you prefer the lights on or off? Why?

I think this depends greatly on my mood and my partner. So it can vary depending on the setting and moment...

Generally speaking, I happen to believe there is beauty all around us. So long as we know where to look. Part of my 'many people look but so few people see' soap box. If you are 'into' your partner, you will look past those things they view as flaws and insecurities and focus rather on those parts of them where you find beauty. In that vein, I like enough light to 'see' her. All her curves and all her flaws. Because her flaws are some of the very things I find so attractive. I love to explore and discover. There are so many untouched treasures due to societies unfair measures against which we judge ourselves. The challenge of course is getting your partner comfortable enough with 'you' that they can be comfortable enough to be truly bare in front of you. And if you can achieve that confidence, you will find treasures galore to enjoy...

Having said all of the above, there is something special about complete darkness. Whether a result of lights out or a blindfold (bonus combination of one seeing while the other cannot). Again, it is an issue of trust and giving. If you can truly be comfortable with your partner, then sensory deprivation such as lack of sight, can fuel enhanced senses in other areas. Enhanced sensation of touch. Especially combined with some auditory stimulus. It is the kind of total trust that leads to total escape from one's demons and making heights of release (figuratively as well as literally - mentally as well as physically).

In summary, for me at least, the 'lights on vs. Lights off' conundrum has more to do with my partner, this trust in me, and the moment than it does with any particular preference I have. Bottom line, I want what will produce the most pleasure for my partner. In the hopes I may be invited back for a repeat performance...

*le sigh*

But then again, what do I know... :rolleyes:
 
to Incognito....

I think thats my exact approach; be so good you are invited back.
 
I think thats my exact approach; be so good you are invited back.

Thanks Da. The older I get the more I think I am an odd duck when it comes to passion. Meh, it is what it is. At least for me... So I appreciate the confirming note... ;) Nice to know while I may still be in the minority, I am not the ONLY one...
 
Yup Incogno...

Thanks Da. The older I get the more I think I am an odd duck when it comes to passion. Meh, it is what it is. At least for me... So I appreciate the confirming note... ;) Nice to know while I may still be in the minority, I am not the ONLY one...

You might think the hunt is better than the chase. You might even conclude that "interesting" is more fun than "pretty."
 
Marijuana: Do you think it should be legal? Why? What about medical marijuana? Prescription only?
 
I think this depends greatly on my mood and my partner. So it can vary depending on the setting and moment...

Generally speaking, I happen to believe there is beauty all around us. So long as we know where to look. Part of my 'many people look but so few people see' soap box. If you are 'into' your partner, you will look past those things they view as flaws and insecurities and focus rather on those parts of them where you find beauty. In that vein, I like enough light to 'see' her. All her curves and all her flaws. Because her flaws are some of the very things I find so attractive. I love to explore and discover. There are so many untouched treasures due to societies unfair measures against which we judge ourselves. The challenge of course is getting your partner comfortable enough with 'you' that they can be comfortable enough to be truly bare in front of you. And if you can achieve that confidence, you will find treasures galore to enjoy...

Having said all of the above, there is something special about complete darkness. Whether a result of lights out or a blindfold (bonus combination of one seeing while the other cannot). Again, it is an issue of trust and giving. If you can truly be comfortable with your partner, then sensory deprivation such as lack of sight, can fuel enhanced senses in other areas. Enhanced sensation of touch. Especially combined with some auditory stimulus. It is the kind of total trust that leads to total escape from one's demons and making heights of release (figuratively as well as literally - mentally as well as physically).

In summary, for me at least, the 'lights on vs. Lights off' conundrum has more to do with my partner, this trust in me, and the moment than it does with any particular preference I have. Bottom line, I want what will produce the most pleasure for my partner. In the hopes I may be invited back for a repeat performance...

*le sigh*

But then again, what do I know... :rolleyes:

*Le sigh* is right. I'm totally mooning over your answer. You are such a lovely person. I always smile when I read your posts. :rose::kiss:
 
Marijuana: Do you think it should be legal? Why? What about medical marijuana? Prescription only?

Living in a state where it is legal for recreational use, I can tell you that it is a weird feeling.

Honest answer. I have never tried it. I have smelled the smoke second hand, but never partook myself. I think as long as people are responsible with it, it should be legal. Otherwise I don't know enough.
 
Marijuana: Do you think it should be legal? Why? What about medical marijuana? Prescription only?

If it helps a person who is ill feel better, by all means give it to them. As far as making is legal? People are doing and going to continue to do it whether we make it legal or not. The government will tax the crap out of it like they do liquor and cigarettes. I personally don't touch the stuff so I have no stake either way other than I think it stinks and don't care to be around it. But hey if that's your thing. *Shrug*
 
Marijuana: Do you think it should be legal? Why? What about medical marijuana? Prescription only?

Legalize it. Tax it.

It takes the power and money from the drug cartels, increases tax revenue, and study after study shows marijuana is less harmful than alcohol.

I actually partake in neither alcohol nor marijuana, personally, but I'm a bit of an ascetic. I still respect other people's right to do so.

I once took a test designed to see where I fell on a political spectrum that judged economic issues on the X axis and personal freedom issues on the Y axis. I fell firmly in the "libertarian left." Basically I believe in socialized medicine and the government breaking up monopolies but if you crazy Texans want your guns that's fine and I'll just try to stay out of the pot smoke in California. :D

Found it: https://www.politicalcompass.org/test

Edit: took it again. Link to results.

Hm, last time I was 100% libertarian on the libertarian/authoritarian axis. Must have changed a strongly disagree/agree to just disagree/agree somewhere. :D

Interesting little test. Though I'd share.
 
Last edited:
Marijuana: Do you think it should be legal? Why? What about medical marijuana? Prescription only?

Meh. Why not? Not a user myself, but the criminalization seems ridiculous when compared to other recreational consumables. It's usage seem to yield less problematic results than alcohol, for one thing. And I agree with curvy, the government could just slap on a sin-tax.

Medical marijuana? Of course. Script? I wouldn't think so, but I don't really know anything about dosage for medical issues.
 
Oooh! I am curious. I took one of these eons ago and tested and landed firmly in "libertarian right". It will be interesting to see if things have changed.

And step away from the "crazy Texans" commentary.

*unsnaps holster*

:p

I was just teasing! I respect your right to carry from a political perspective. I'll have you know I voted against all of California's insane gun laws.

Also I retook it and I edited my results in above.

*ducks behind table*
 
I was just teasing! I respect your right to carry from a political perspective. I'll have you know I voted against all of California's insane gun laws.

Also I retook it and I edited my results in above.

*ducks behind table*

*re-snaps*

But I'm watching you. :p


Dude. You are quite the lefty. Something of a jump from libertarian/authoritarian!


Interesting. I usually skew a little more authoritarian/right. Maybe the test? There were several questions where I would have tested neutral but was forced to choose agree or disagree. Results.
 
Last edited:
*re-snaps*

But I'm watching you. :p


Dude. You are quite the lefty. Something of a jump from libertarian/authoritarian!

Haha, yeah. Though if you take that test you'll notice that a lot of those questions are about large international corporations and that's how they judge right/left. And I have a...distaste for big corporations. Oh well. :p

The only two questions they had on social support (that I remember) were about the government supporting art that couldn't make it on the free market and supporting people able to but unwilling to work. And my answers there were to the right. If nobody wants to buy their shitty art that's their problem.
 
Marijuana: Do you think it should be legal? Why? What about medical marijuana? Prescription only?
On the topic of drugs, I'm marginally of the view that it's better overall for the state to take charge of legal distribution (together with support funded from the takings) with a view to driving out of business the other unsavoury aspects of the trade.

It's a marginal view because I can see plenty of downsides to that approach too, and it would take a very brave politician to act on it. As I understand it from the experts, though, it might be the least worst solution.
.
 
< It's a marginal view because I can see plenty of downsides to that approach too, and it would take a very brave politician to act on it. As I understand it from the experts, though, it might be the least worst solution.
.

Agreed. Removing the criminal element and instituting quality control could only be an improvement.

Aaaand while I've gone full on political, I absolutely loved this: http://reason.com/reasontv/2017/07/13/game-of-thrones-the-libertarian-edition

I've always had a healthy respect for libertarians. There are Game of Thrones spoilers in there. Still funny if you haven't seen the show. But definite spoilers.

Hahaha! And now I want to watch Game of Thrones.

*realizes she's probably one of the few who's never seen an episode.
 
Last edited:
GoT is a great show!

And now the topic has been completely derailed. My work here is done. :cool:
 
Back
Top