FBI Raids Orange Guy's Compound.

Justice Dept asks appeals court to end third-party review of documents seized from Trump home

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/www.reuters.com.icoReuters|2 hours ago
The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal appeals court to end a special third-party review of documents seized from former President Donald Trump's home in Florida, arguing that a district court should not have appointed a "special master" in the case.


And then look into the Judge.
so... if the appeals court sides with the DOJ, will that mean team-trump applies to SCOTUS to overturn that as before with the classified docs when it got refused?
 
The DOJ and its FBI were designed to be apolitical organizations that can weigh the law against individuals impartial to their politics hence its symbol of a blinded Lady Justice. Today it is clear both organizations have been weaponized by Democrats for use against their political enemies. No Democrat since the Obama regime has been treated with the same disregard for individual legal and constitutional rights as Donald Trump and his associates. What we saw yesterday was the Deep State and the Biden White House declaring they cannot defeat Trump politically so they will continue with their criminal conspiracy to frame him with false accusations and prosecution. There is a legal high bar for that raid that occurred yesterday, They will have to show in court the raid was the only solution to the seized evidence being destroyed and that Trump intended to do so, and NYTs Trump hater Maggie Haberman's staged photos of notes in a toilet bowl published over the weekend aren't going to cut it.
^^^whatever happened to this dumb cunt? Left the house and forgot how to get back?
 
Some points:

""This appeal requires us to consider whether the district court had jurisdiction to block the United States from using lawfully seized records in a criminal investigation. The answer is no," the three-judge panel wrote in its ruling.
"The law is clear. We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so."



" "But as we have said, the status of a document as personal or presidential does not alter the authority of the government to seize it under a warrant supported by probable cause," the court ruled on Thursday."


They stuck their finger in Donny's Cannon too:

"U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, granted a request in September to name a special master to review the documents in response to the ex-president's suggestion that the FBI planted evidence during its search.

The Justice Department opposed Cannon's ruling at the time, arguing she overstepped her bounds. The appeals judges agreed on Thursday.

"Accordingly, we agree with the government that the district court improperly exercised equitable jurisdiction, and that dismissal of the entire proceeding is required," the judges wrote."
 
Some points:

""This appeal requires us to consider whether the district court had jurisdiction to block the United States from using lawfully seized records in a criminal investigation. The answer is no," the three-judge panel wrote in its ruling.
"The law is clear. We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so."



" "But as we have said, the status of a document as personal or presidential does not alter the authority of the government to seize it under a warrant supported by probable cause," the court ruled on Thursday."


They stuck their finger in Donny's Cannon too:

"U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, granted a request in September to name a special master to review the documents in response to the ex-president's suggestion that the FBI planted evidence during its search.

The Justice Department opposed Cannon's ruling at the time, arguing she overstepped her bounds. The appeals judges agreed on Thursday.

"Accordingly, we agree with the government that the district court improperly exercised equitable jurisdiction, and that dismissal of the entire proceeding is required," the judges wrote."
And a unanimous ruling of all three judges, two DJT appointees and one GWB.

I’m sure the MAGA folks will cry that they weren’t loyal to DJT and it’s a conspiracy. How dare these judges follow the law?!?! They even said the original judge needs to dismiss the case entirely because she had no business in it.

But, staying in Florida, DeSantis is trying some of the same packing of the courts, hoping he will get favorable rulings when needed. But he has problems following the Florida constitution, this time he has candidates who don’t even live where they are supposed to live to fill the slots.

Where have we heard this residency thing before? Not a Georgia senate candidate who said “I live in Texas…”. Mehmet was sent back to NJ. Even the GA Lt. Gov said he couldn’t vote for Walker. Hard to get to the end zone when you only have few blockers. He needs those who won landslides to really help. The GA governor has been trying to help, but not saying much to praise Walker, just that he won’t go along with Biden like Warnock. That didn’t seem to be enough to push the needle in the first election, will be enough now?

The Lt Gov. didn’t think it was enough for him so he didn’t vote. (almost seems like a JohnE type move, he showed up to vote and didn’t. Going to the gas pump and Bing fraud alert while pumping… I know JohnE you were trying to make a point, I wonder who did it more effectively? I would say the Lt Gov)

What’s that? Walker has Cancun Ted Cruz to help? Is that really a help? Third string OL at best.

And with this race for the senate not one that brings control to the republicans, will it get enough republicans who can stomach voting for Walker out to the polls?

And where is DJT? He should be out there with him “helping”. Oh, that’s right, he’s in some legal trouble of his own. Maybe he will get the SC to hear his appeal, but that seems unlikely.

What new is there for them to rule on? The court of appeals put out a full rebuke for all legal avenues, defending the separation of powers. But there always is another lie DJT can come up with, but only has 7 days to do it. I’m sure some of the MAGA lovers on this board are ready to jump in with suggestions that make no sense, but DJT loves those ideas, any thing to get him off the hook, so let’s hear them!

Linus will talk about the second amendment.

Iso will throw in something he googled that he doesn’t understand.

Ican… well can you?

I’m sure I’m leaving some out…. and you will be all sad, but please. How does DJT get out of this one? Oh he can just “think it” and it happens? Which of the five words helps him? Person, woman, man, camera, or tv? Or maybe the Yo semites can help him?

Now maybe DJT goes away and we gotta deal with someone even worse in DeSantis.
 
But, staying in Florida, DeSantis is trying some of the same packing of the courts,

Where??

Kinda hard since Trump packed zero courts.

And where is DJT? He should be out there with him “helping”. Oh, that’s right, he’s in some legal trouble of his own.

Major problem with a partisan weaponized gestapo of a DOJ.

Linus will talk about the second amendment.

Only in that you've never read it and if you have your English is so fucking poor you don't understand a word of it.
I’m sure I’m leaving some out…. and you will be all sad, but please. How does DJT get out of this one?

He just waits for all the news outlets to backpedal on their hype and the FBI to embarrass themselves as little more than DNC henchmen yet again.
Now maybe DJT goes away and we gotta deal with someone even worse in DeSantis.

What exactly makes DeSantis "worse"???

His support for civil rights and liberty or is it his patriotism that disgusts you???
 
Kinda hard since Trump packed zero courts.
You have to be kidding. You are kidding right?
Major problem with a partisan weaponized gestapo of a DOJ.
Look who likes the word gestapo. Seems like a word you like, bring us back to the good old days does it?
Only in that you've never read it and if you have your English is so fucking poor you don't understand a word of it.
Aren’t many words there to understand.
He just waits for all the news outlets to backpedal on their hype and the FBI to embarrass themselves as little more than DNC henchmen yet again.
which outlets are you calling news?
What exactly makes DeSantis "worse"???

His support for civil rights and liberty or is it his patriotism that disgusts you???
It’s his overt racism that does. And his anti free speech. Seems a judge in Tallahassee just said the same thing in November. You sleeping as that happened? DeSantis is counting on his appointed judges to help him on appeal. Dystopian.
 
You have to be kidding. You are kidding right?

Nope, not a single one.

Appointing judges isn't packing courts.

Look who likes the word gestapo. Seems like a word you like, bring us back to the good old days does it?

It's a fitting description of the Democrat partisan justice system.

Aren’t many words there to understand.

And yet you failed completely to understand, somehow thinking it is a right of government, NOT the people, and focus pointlessly on the word militia for some reason.

which outlets are you calling news?

All the mainstream "news" outlets like MSNBC, CNN and NYT.

It’s his overt racism that does.

What overt racism??

And his anti free speech.

He's not anti-free speech.

Seems a judge in Tallahassee just said the same thing in November. You sleeping as that happened? DeSantis is counting on his appointed judges to help him on appeal. Dystopian.

I'm sure there are Democrat judges in FL.

Nothing dystopian about protecting children from psychotic perverts.
 
Nope, not a single one.
Appointing judges isn't packing courts.
What would be? Rushed confirmations? Delay on others?
It's a fitting description of the Democrat partisan justice system.
Nah, your love of Hitler and Putin. They have “values”
And yet you failed completely to understand, somehow thinking it is a right of government, NOT the people, and focus pointlessly on the word militia for some reason.
Cling to it, feels good doesn’t it?
All the mainstream "news" outlets like MSNBC, CNN and NYT.
Hmmm and the others don’t bother to retract anything because who cares about facts!?!?

So much fun to call the FBI partisan when it’s against your guys.
What overt racism??
Ummm, let’s go with just his references to Sec Chao. Just one in a long line of his comments.
He's not anti-free speech.
Seems that’s what the judge ruled, it was against free speech. But typical answer, a democratic judge. How the the GOP judges do on the court of appeals for the special master smackdown? Those aren’t the old tired washed up judges are they? DJT just appointed two of them.
I'm sure there are Democrat judges in FL.

Nothing dystopian about protecting children from psychotic perverts.
Talking about Perverts, hope Gaetz has some free time coming up. Seems republicans in Florida are the ones to look out for.

DeSantis should pass a no Republican pervert law and throw the book at them, if he is so much for protecting children. But then he just yells at kids.

He is just for poll numbers and pandering. But you think he is better than DJT. Good luck with that. Another thing you are wrong about. Poor Linus, one day the wrongs will all catch up. Look up those guns, we don’t want a tragedy
 
What would be?

Adding more justices.

Like what the democrats wanted to do so they could retain a partisan SCOTUS.... that's actually packing the court.

Nah, your love of Hitler and Putin.

You're just flailing now. :ROFLMAO:

Ummm, let’s go with just his references to Sec Chao. Just one in a long line of his comments.

So nothing specific....thought so, got it.

.
Talking about Perverts, hope Gaetz has some free time coming up. Seems republicans in Florida are the ones to look out for.

I'll believe the smears, from cheap smear merchants and propaganda outlets like AP, when something actually happens.

And I'll take Democrats seriously as not being total fuckin' perverts when they release the Epstein client list.

DeSantis should pass a no Republican pervert law and throw the book at them, if he is so much for protecting children.

Republicans aren't trying to bring sexually explicit materials into K-3rd classes nor are they trying to use public schools to mutilate kids behind their parents backs.

Those are exclusively "progressive" Democrat endeavors.

Which is exactly why it upset Democrats so much that he banned such things.

He is just for poll numbers and pandering.

Yes.... he's doing what his constituents asked him to do. That's why he's so fucking popular. Crazy concept right???

Democrats and Republicans alike should take note, actually taking a stance and doing what you said you would do...... gets you landslide re-elections.

But you think he is better than DJT. Good luck with that. Another thing you are wrong about. Poor Linus, one day the wrongs will all catch up. Look up those guns, we don’t want a tragedy

How am I wrong?? Don't worry., I know you can't actually answer a direct question, you would need some substance about you for that.
 
Asmo says it’s impossible to pack the courts, because there is only one court in the US that can ever be packed, the Supreme Court. Any usage of the plural form must therefore be meaningless.
 
Asmo says it’s impossible to pack the courts, because there is only one court in the US that can ever be packed, the Supreme Court.

Where did I say any such thing???

Why must you lie so much?? OH right this is the part you're triggered by facts but can't really argue your feelings so you resort to blatant lies.
 
Please explain exactly what you meant here, and the difference between the terms “appointing judges” and “adding more justices.”

So you have absolutely NOTHING to support me ever saying anything remotely close to the insane ascription you posted..... got it.


Appointing a justice (filling a vacant seat) after a justice retires or dies, isn't packing the court.

Adding more justices to the court, that is expanding the court from nine to say 13 or 15 justices, is packing the court.


Which is funny because Democrats have long been accusing Trump of packing the court because he didn't appoint woke activist justices.....as though he were some evil court packing monster. All the while they advocating adding more justices for more 'democratic representation' making them the actual court packers. LOL.
 
Back
Top