EmilyMiller
Story marketing slut
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2022
- Posts
- 15,178
SecondLooked TLA. Up in urban dictionary
First definition: Titty Love Affection
Second: Three Letter Acronym
Please clarify.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SecondLooked TLA. Up in urban dictionary
First definition: Titty Love Affection
Second: Three Letter Acronym
Please clarify.
I was being facetious...Second
Again, I was being facetious... Software has more TLA's than the governmentComes from government agencies that tend to have TLAs. FBI, CIA, FCC, FAA, etc.
IRL A2V is genrally a very bad idea. To paraphrase Kevin Smith, in the heat of the moment, A2M is fine. I’ve never had a problem (our recent experience with tummy bugs was a thing going round the school of an extended family member).Anal anything is one of my squicks. I’ll click away from anal content immediately (sorry, Em!). Yes, I’ve had a girlfriend or two think that a prostate massage is part of the deal, and I managed to not kick them out of the bed.
My problem is the hygiene aspects. I see a porn flick where the portrayal is oral to vaginal to anal and back to either, and I just want to scream “NO! NO NO NO! Don’t do that!”. However, I understand that porn producers put their actors through all sorts of misery like cleansing colonics, disinfecting procedures, and probably other stuff akin to a colonoscopy prep to protect the persons involved. The bottom (pun!) line is don’t try this at home!
Intestinal flora is bad bad bad anyplace other than where it belongs. In my swinger-heavy ficverse, the MMC and group leader’s Rule #1 is no anal activity, period. M-M activity is touching and sucking only, do that “other thing” someplace else. If you go there (another pun!) anyway, you are to all but sterilize whatever touched it or you are banished from the communal hot tub, where most of the hot action is, or at least where it gets started.
I was a research biologist, FFS.
Cool. And - for the avoidance of doubt - my last group was years ago.I knew that, and have taken your serious comments on this aspect of intimacy seriously, as well. I appreciate what you offer with this uncomfortable topic.
Well the topic is uncomfortable. The other "comfort" reality is a matter of preference. Or taste. Eww. I said "taste". Ohgawd.
Turn off the imaginary commentator and write the story you want to write, whether it includes prostate play, kissing after blowjobs, or any such activity. We're not writing "how to" manuals. It's fiction.My stories appeal to heterosexual men who know what to expect from their stroke material. However, there are a few things I'd like to change up going forward and I'm 99% sure it'll cause a few readers to flee.
1) My male characters should be just as sexy as my female characters and that'll see me get a bit steamier about how I describe their appearance and the way sex scenes play out.
2) Part of the fun of an MMF threesome (or any other group sex with 2+ guys) is that they're feeding off each other. You can write (and I probably have written) such scenes where the men have zero interaction with each other. They're basically floating penises detached from bodies.
3) Kissing after blowjobs. It happens and there's nothing wrong with it, but I've always purposely avoided it because I had some imaginary commenter in mind.
Okay, so there's all that and then there's point number four and the title of this post... The finger in the bum in instances where the bum in question belongs to a gent. Well, it could be a finger or a tongue or even a toy. Again, the imaginary commenter is shouting at me.
I'm 100% resolved that these things will be included in future stories, but I'm also 100% sure it'll upset maybe a large portion of readers. Maybe I'm wrong...
To what extent are certain people (straight male readers) still averse to this sort of thing?
I mean, there's an episode of the Sopranos where a guy performing oral sex (on his wife)is painted as undermining his masculinity. Sure, some people still think like that, but it feels like it's now a small minority and you certainly won't catch flack for putting a story about it on Lit.
Like many things, it has misogynist origins.... Is it just the penetrative aspect that puts men off?
I actually think it's the other way around: the prostrate is the great equaliser. King or commoner, sooner or later we all have to bend over and grit our teeth while the doctor makes small-talk.On the back of this let's all reflect on King Charles's prostrate and in particular the poor doctor who drew the short straw to be the one to first shove his finger up the royal rectum.
I'm sure for most doctors it's all in a day's work but still, I bet he spent hours filing his fingernails.
I always think it's strange how we let society dictate what we're supposed to like. Sex, more than anything except perhaps food, is supposed to be about self-indulgence. If you're not going to enjoy it, or not going to do the things you enjoy, then why even bother?Anal play doesn’t make a guy gay. Taking a strap-on doesn’t make a guy gay.
I took a chance in two of my stories, and the readers didn't seem to mind. I didn't get any horrible comments, and the scores didn't really change.My stories appeal to heterosexual men who know what to expect from their stroke material. However, there are a few things I'd like to change up going forward and I'm 99% sure it'll cause a few readers to flee.
1) My male characters should be just as sexy as my female characters and that'll see me get a bit steamier about how I describe their appearance and the way sex scenes play out.
2) Part of the fun of an MMF threesome (or any other group sex with 2+ guys) is that they're feeding off each other. You can write (and I probably have written) such scenes where the men have zero interaction with each other. They're basically floating penises detached from bodies.
3) Kissing after blowjobs. It happens and there's nothing wrong with it, but I've always purposely avoided it because I had some imaginary commenter in mind.
Okay, so there's all that and then there's point number four and the title of this post... The finger in the bum in instances where the bum in question belongs to a gent. Well, it could be a finger or a tongue or even a toy. Again, the imaginary commenter is shouting at me.
I'm 100% resolved that these things will be included in future stories, but I'm also 100% sure it'll upset maybe a large portion of readers. Maybe I'm wrong...
To what extent are certain people (straight male readers) still averse to this sort of thing?
I mean, there's an episode of the Sopranos where a guy performing oral sex (on his wife)is painted as undermining his masculinity. Sure, some people still think like that, but it feels like it's now a small minority and you certainly won't catch flack for putting a story about it on Lit.
For those of us that believe in a creator, how much sense does it make that something(one) that can create something as wonderous and expansive as our universe really cares who we fuck or how. I'd think they'd/he'd/she's be rather busy with like universe level shit...I always think it's strange how we let society dictate what we're supposed to like. Sex, more than anything except perhaps food, is supposed to be about self-indulgence. If you're not going to enjoy it, or not going to do the things you enjoy, then why even bother?
Morals <> religionAnd if you don't believe, well that sort of leave your morals open to interpretation, so...
True. There's a whole nother thread about that. Just intending to imply that most societal based ethics ,especially sexual ethics and morals, do tend to be religion based.(Great American Puritan Ethic and all that BS)Morals <> religion
I assume my personal feelings are shared by a fair fraction of those who are wary of being the subject of ass play. Nothing to do with misogyny. Rather, I haven't experienced it, and am fearful. My associations with the concept are prison rape, and painful times I've gone #2. The word pegging evokes the idea of a wooden rod being jammed in there. It all seems quite fraught. I hear it feels good, and I even believe that, on an intellectual level assuming proper technique, but that's hard to imagine on the sensation level. As for BJ's, I'm just straight and not hugely interested, but there's nothing particularly humiliating or unpleasant about the idea unless it's forced.Like many things, it has misogynist origins.
Most straight men use "cocksucker" and "fucked in the ass" as taunts, put-downs, and references to extreme embarrassment and humiliation. And yet, what do most straight men want?? Their female partner to give them BJ's and receive anal sex. It's as if men want women to crave and enjoy the very two things they have grotesquely demonized forever. So fucked up.
..So yes, this get's internalized so men then feel like having something up their butt is feminizing and humiliating. ..So stupid. ..It feels great. Their loss.
In a society so fucked up that the word 'fuck' is negative and insulting... it's no surprise! (see what I did there?)Like many things, it has misogynist origins.
Most straight men use "cocksucker" and "fucked in the ass" as taunts, put-downs, and references to extreme embarrassment and humiliation. And yet, what do most straight men want?? Their female partner to give them BJ's and receive anal sex. It's as if men want women to crave and enjoy the very two things they have grotesquely demonized forever. So fucked up.
..So yes, this get's internalized so men then feel like having something up their butt is feminizing and humiliating. ..So stupid. ..It feels great. Their loss.
Yet again… I am sooooo fucking vanilla!The other day I rediscovered a sci-fi story I'd been working on where the male character encounters a pond full of miniature cephalopods that secrete an arousing oil and that have a tendency to... burrow. When I get round to finishing the story, I won't worry about leaving the scene in. It's too hot to cut.
The scene is actually quite vanilla. Despite the six-boobed catwoman.Yet again… I am sooooo fucking vanilla!
Emily