JuanSeiszFitzHall
yet another
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2019
- Posts
- 1,152
I’ve concluded that there’s more than a little interest in bisexuality among men who are straight, IRL. This is based on response to my own writings here, so we’re talking about a narrow slice within the narrow(-ish?) slice of Literotica readers.
I’ve posted five multi-part series here. “Two Bi Two” is about an FMFM foursome (however one likes to arrange the letters; in the story, they shift around a fair amount) in which one of the men is fully bisexual, while the other is bicurious, and Goes On The Journey. This series has by far the most views, individually and collectively, of all my series. Discounting a three-part series in Humor and Satire that has been sparsely read, “Two Bi Two” has the highest ratings among my series. This is the only thing I’ve written which has male bisexuality as a major plot aspect.
This series has specific tags, and a preface stating that the male characters will bang. I didn’t take it for granted that the title would make this sufficiently clear.
Moving on: In reading this thread, I saw two instances of the gland inside the male taint referred to as ‘prostrate.’ I’ll take this as an autocorrect acting on ‘prostate.’ Being prostrate is not an ideal posture for a prostate exam.
Twitchiness about his own butthole is, I believe, something that a man can outgrow. Sorry to over-share, but my own prostate exams have elicited from me a response of “Yeah, whatever.” The doctors have been skilled, and deft, and there were no adverse after-effects. (To me, anyway; whether the doctors were traumatized by the experience, I don’t know.) My own choice is to neither give nor receive anal sex. The hygiene aspects seem to require many work-arounds, and the after-effects might be adverse.
Meanwhile, there’s straight-male homophobia and misogyny persistent in attitudes and language. I have an essay here titled “In Defense of ‘Suck,’” in which I assert that if one likes to be sucked, one shouldn’t use ‘suck’ as derogatory. It may be that the issue here is mainly age-group, and as geezers like myself shuffle off this mortal coil, the attitudes may evolve. Here’s another over-share: At age 47, I had a vasectomy. The person in charge was a man, around my age. What I didn’t know, until I was nekkid on the slab, was that assisting the procedure was an attractive young woman. For me, this was another “Yeah, whatever” moment. I had aged out of that kind of embarrassment.
I’ve posted five multi-part series here. “Two Bi Two” is about an FMFM foursome (however one likes to arrange the letters; in the story, they shift around a fair amount) in which one of the men is fully bisexual, while the other is bicurious, and Goes On The Journey. This series has by far the most views, individually and collectively, of all my series. Discounting a three-part series in Humor and Satire that has been sparsely read, “Two Bi Two” has the highest ratings among my series. This is the only thing I’ve written which has male bisexuality as a major plot aspect.
This series has specific tags, and a preface stating that the male characters will bang. I didn’t take it for granted that the title would make this sufficiently clear.
Moving on: In reading this thread, I saw two instances of the gland inside the male taint referred to as ‘prostrate.’ I’ll take this as an autocorrect acting on ‘prostate.’ Being prostrate is not an ideal posture for a prostate exam.
Twitchiness about his own butthole is, I believe, something that a man can outgrow. Sorry to over-share, but my own prostate exams have elicited from me a response of “Yeah, whatever.” The doctors have been skilled, and deft, and there were no adverse after-effects. (To me, anyway; whether the doctors were traumatized by the experience, I don’t know.) My own choice is to neither give nor receive anal sex. The hygiene aspects seem to require many work-arounds, and the after-effects might be adverse.
Meanwhile, there’s straight-male homophobia and misogyny persistent in attitudes and language. I have an essay here titled “In Defense of ‘Suck,’” in which I assert that if one likes to be sucked, one shouldn’t use ‘suck’ as derogatory. It may be that the issue here is mainly age-group, and as geezers like myself shuffle off this mortal coil, the attitudes may evolve. Here’s another over-share: At age 47, I had a vasectomy. The person in charge was a man, around my age. What I didn’t know, until I was nekkid on the slab, was that assisting the procedure was an attractive young woman. For me, this was another “Yeah, whatever” moment. I had aged out of that kind of embarrassment.