dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 5,422
Written into the Ukrainian Constitution. How's that BS again?
When proven wrong, you whine and respond with BS. You cannot accept the truth because it doesn't fit your narrative.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Written into the Ukrainian Constitution. How's that BS again?
This continues to be a horseshit line.Yes he is. He's cancelled democracy in Ukraine and refuses to hold elections. At present, there is no reliable measure of his popularity as millions have left the country, hundreds of thousands killed and wounded. Millions have been dispossessed of their homes and property. He's afraid to hold elections. There is no reliable indicator of the Ukrainian public's desire to fight this war to the end.
What does that have to do with what we were talking about? It is the US and the West who have pushed NATO eastward, after originally promising not to do so. I found this in a web search:Ukraine should not meet until a ceasefire is in place and Russia ensures they are adhering 100%.
At this point, of even eldemand they return Ukranian children who were kidnapped.
This is not a reality in any sense of the word. Russia has driven multiple countries into NATO membership and alienated itself from the majority of the world.
NATO expansion was due to Russian aggressionWhat does that have to do with what we were talking about? It is the US and the West who have pushed NATO eastward, after originally promising not to do so. I found this in a web search:
Yawn"there is documented evidence that U.S. Secretary of State James Baker made assurances to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in February 1990 regarding NATO's eastward expansion. During a meeting on February 9, 1990, Baker stated that NATO would not expand "one inch eastward" beyond its current position if Germany were allowed to reunify within NATO. This assurance was part of discussions aimed at addressing Soviet security concerns during the negotiations over German reunification".National Security Archive
Yes, because Russia has been using FSB resources to infiltrate their countries from withinSince 1990, 14 countries, many of which were once firmly in Moscow's orbit, have joined NATO. From the Russian perspective, each of these additions can be seen as a violation of the spirit (if not the letter) of the 1990 assurance. Whether the U.S. “helped” them join is almost beside the point, NATO is a U.S.-led alliance, and every expansion was done with U.S. backing. In 2008 we tried to do this with Georgia as well. all designed to surround and isolate Russia. That was the official strategy, but it was pushed forward by stupid people ignorant of the potential for war.
What does that have to do with what we were talking about? It is the US and the West who have pushed NATO eastward, after originally promising not to do so. I found this in a web search:
"there is documented evidence that U.S. Secretary of State James Baker made assurances to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in February 1990 regarding NATO's eastward expansion. During a meeting on February 9, 1990, Baker stated that NATO would not expand "one inch eastward" beyond its current position if Germany were allowed to reunify within NATO. This assurance was part of discussions aimed at addressing Soviet security concerns during the negotiations over German reunification".National Security Archive
Since 1990, 14 countries, many of which were once firmly in Moscow's orbit, have joined NATO. From the Russian perspective, each of these additions can be seen as a violation of the spirit (if not the letter) of the 1990 assurance. Whether the U.S. “helped” them join is almost beside the point, NATO is a U.S.-led alliance, and every expansion was done with U.S. backing. In 2008 we tried to do this with Georgia as well. all designed to surround and isolate Russia. That was the official strategy, but it was pushed forward by stupid people ignorant of the potential for war.
You can absolutely be "highly educated & accomplished" and still be a moron—especially if you’ve been brainwashed in one of those “humane” faculties, where even empirical truth is up for debate these days.You mean the highly educated & accomplished Kamala
You can absolutely be "highly educated & accomplished" and still be a moron
You can absolutely be "highly educated & accomplished" and still be a moron—especially if you’ve been brainwashed in one of those “humane” faculties, where even empirical truth is up for debate these days.
What’s happened in the U.S. academy over the past 30 years is nothing short of an educational holocaust: generations of illiterate zombies being indoctrinated by neo-Marxists and anarchists. No critical thinking, no independent thought, no exploration of subjects beyond the approved curriculum. Any voice outside the choir gets cast out—and all of this horror is funded by Qatari money.
So yes, it’s entirely possible for someone like Kamala to be “highly educated” and still have the intelligence of a stool.
You actually cast your vote for someone whose brain short-circuits without a teleprompter.
I can't be MAGA. I'm not even American. Besides, America can't become great again.Anti-intellectual MAGA sheep are hilarious.
What’s happened in the U.S. academy over the past 30 years is nothing short of an educational holocaust: generations of illiterate zombies being indoctrinated by neo-Marxists and anarchists.
This is nonsense Chloe. Totally.None of that is relevant. Russia is the sole survvong totalitarian power from WW2, an ally of Hitler and far more oppressive and genocidal that Nazi Germany.
A search reveals what is relevant:None of that is relevant. Russia is the sole survvong totalitarian power from WW2, an ally of Hitler and far more oppressive and genocidal that Nazi Germany.
A search reveals what is relevant:
Key Facts:
- About 80% of German military casualties in WWII occurred on the Eastern Front.
- By the time of D-Day (June 1944), Germany had already lost millions of soldiers fighting the Soviets, particularly in catastrophic defeats at Stalingrad (1943), Kursk (1943), and the subsequent Soviet offensives throughout 1943–44.
- Germany’s largest and most experienced army groups were engaged in the East, and many had been destroyed or severely weakened by the time the Western Allies launched Operation Overlord.
Perspective from Military Historians:
Historians widely agree that the Soviet Union was the primary force in defeating Nazi Germany, with the Western Front acting as a critical — but secondary — theater until mid-1944. The Normandy invasion certainly accelerated Germany’s collapse, but the decisive bleeding of German manpower and resources happened in the East.
In Summary:
Yes — the Red Army destroyed the bulk of Hitler’s Wehrmacht before the Allies ever set foot on Normandy’s beaches.
That's what your "ally" of Hitler did. Granted we paid for a lot of it in lend Lease, but they did the heavy lifting in WWII Europe. I'm not here to defend the Soviets, only the facts. Just like then, especially in our media, there are few facts about what is happening in Ukraine, vis a vis the Russians ground campaign in Ukraine.

Yes, many welcomed the Germans as liberators from Stalin's tyranny. But they soon found out that for anyone not of German blood, Hitler's tyranny was even worse. Stalin saw them as tools to use, but Hitler saw them as vermin to exterminate. If Hitler had won, the Holocaust that happened in our history would only be a footnote to a far vaster holocaust consuming most of the Soviet population.How Lithuanians greeted German troops at the start of WW2..............and, gosh, Lithuania welcomes German troops in....2025. I wonder why.....
Yes, many welcomed the Germans as liberators from Stalin's tyranny. But they soon found out that for anyone not of German blood, Hitler's tyranny was even worse. Stalin saw them as tools to use, but Hitler saw them as vermin to exterminate. If Hitler had won, the Holocaust that happened in our history would only be a footnote to a far vaster holocaust consuming most of the Soviet population.

