ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 19,764
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. I've resisted posting sources for a couple of reasons. A) That source is unreliable, biased or it's a fox clone. B) What happens after you provide a source is the insult slinging, ad-hom and name calling. If you're looking for objective consideration you won't find it here. Orange Man Bad the the only menu available.Maybe I am thinking of Politburo or whatever the fuck his name is but I am out of the habit of posting sources since that asshole ignores them even when they're a source he has cited.
I agree. I've resisted posting sources for a couple of reasons. A) That source is unreliable, biased or it's a fox clone. B) What happens after you provide a source is the insult slinging, ad-hom and name calling. If you're looking for objective consideration you won't find it here. Orange Man Bad the the only menu available.
And when elections are held for President, the likely winner will be Zaluzhny - omg I can spell that name without looking it up!!!!! In all the Ukrainian polls, he's the guy who will win against any other candidate or combination of candidates. A worthy sucessor to Zelensky!Zelensky is not hesitant to hold elections. He has no say in the decision.
Ukranian Parliament continues the declaration of martial law.
As a result, elections cannot be held, in accordance to the Ukranian Constitution.
If the Parliament ends martial law, elections will be held.
You are an imaginative provocateur of disinformation and fantastic speculation.If peace talks were imminent, and if Trump was serious about ending the war, then launching deep strikes against strategic Russian targets the day before negotiations would be wildly counterproductive. It would enrage Moscow and shift Putin toward hardliners, undermine Trump’s image as a “great negotiator,” signal to the world that the U.S. or NATO doesn’t want peace, so it seems the timing is either a catastrophic miscalculation, or a deliberate provocation to derail diplomacy.
Suppose Trump was genuinely trying to engineer peace and did not authorize this. In that case, I think this might very well have been a purposeful act of intelligence overreach engineered by the CIA and the MI6, a factional act to blow up the table before the cards were dealt. It has all the hallmarks of a deep state veto on de-escalation. The absence of an official statement by Donald Trump on the attack is telling. So far the White House has been silent.

You are having a hard time selling the idea that Trump isn't a Russian sympathizer to the board here, Bubba. On numerous occasions, he's said he knows and gets along very well with Putin, that Putin likes him, and even that Putin wouldn't lie in the past about other things to him. Sounds muy simpatico to me, Bubba.Trump is not sympathetic to the Russians. He just knows that Ukraine cannot win this war and the US can no longer fund it. He wants to stop the war, that is all. He also knows that you cannot get to the peace table if escalatory strikes of major consequence are planned to prevent those talks. I think, at this point, we might just walk away. As I said before, this war will be settled on the battlefield. At this point, the Russians have every legal right to move from a "special military operation" to a declaration of war and flatten Kiev.
I assume you believe that at a certain point rapists have a right to kill their victims if their victims fight back?
The analogy works for me. I see Ukraine as the victim and Russia as the rapist, don't you? It's pretty clear from all the available information. Russia systematically violates [rapes] Ukrainian civilians as well as slaughtering POW in voliation of the Geneva Convention. Putin has explicitly said he intends to wipe out Ukraine; sounds genocidal to me as well.That’s a cheap and disgusting analogy, and worse, it betrays a total lack of seriousness about the stakes involved. We’re talking about deep strikes on strategic nuclear infrastructure in a nuclear-armed superpower, not some heroic fantasy of resistance. This happened the day before peace talks, and it’s not even clear the U.S. President authorized it. If you think that launching unauthorized escalatory attacks on Russia’s strategic assets won’t provoke a response, you’re playing with fire in a powder room.
If Russia decides to respond by bombing Kyiv, or worse, it won’t be because it’s a "rapist angry at a victim fighting back." It’ll be because someone sabotaged a diplomatic off-ramp, forced their hand, and pushed this war into an uncontrollable phase. You’re not making a moral point. You’re just romanticizing reckless escalation under the guise of justice.
This isn’t a Marvel movie. There are no heroes here, just consequences. And if you can't tell the difference between fighting for freedom and blowing up the peace table, then maybe you’re the one who's lost the plot.
You didn't even mention Russians extensive kidnapping of Ukranian children.The analogy works for me. I see Ukraine as the victim and Russia as the rapist, don't you? It's pretty clear from all the available information. Russia systematically violates [rapes] Ukrainian civilians as well as slaughtering POW in voliation of the Geneva Convention. Putin has explicitly said he intends to wipe out Ukraine; sounds genocidal to me as well.
You speak as though this were a paper and pen exercise in resolving a messy divorce settlement rather than a nation fighting for its identity, its land, and its sovereignty.
The rest of what you said is an indefensible plot, Russian commrade.
Bubba, you're spewing yellow urine here. Zelensky holds the job because he was in it when his government was in wartime situations.For all practical purposes, Volodymyr Zelensky functions as the de facto dictator of Ukraine. Elections, both presidential and parliamentary, have been indefinitely suspended under martial law, which has been extended continuously since 2022. This effectively nullifies the democratic process and extends Zelensky’s term without public consent.
Under martial law, he exercises sweeping powers: opposition parties have been banned, media has been consolidated under state control, and regional leaders, like Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko, have publicly accused Zelensky of authoritarian centralization.
This isn’t about Russia or Ukraine’s right to self-defense; it’s about a wartime leader consolidating power in a way that silences dissent and avoids electoral accountability. If a leader cancels elections, controls the press, bans political opponents, and rules by decree, what do you call that, if not a dictatorship in practice?
The USA isn't at war, but we have a man acting like he wants the right to suspend the Constitution and the right to habeas corpus.
There aren't that many.Eh, suspending habeas so we can deport some 20 million illegals is practical.
Sorry, I was focused on the items in his post and forgot the children. But you reminded him, so there is that jab now. Thanks.You didn't even mention Russians extensive kidnapping of Ukranian children.
More like 35,000,000 and that might be lowThere aren't that many.
Bubba, you're spewing yellow urine here. Zelensky holds the job because he was in it when his government was in wartime situations.
The USA isn't at war, but we have a man acting like he wants the right to suspend the Constitution and the right to habeas corpus. That sounds like your definition.
On the other hand, Zelyskyy's support from his citizenry is rocking and rolling. It tells me he is doing what citizens are asking of him.
Your comments are just bait for Russian trolls.
Nothing wrong with following legal precedent on deportation. There are courts already established for this and the process is streamlined. It takes more judges and staff to handle it of course, but it is the proper manner of dealing with those cases.Eh, suspending habeas so we can deport some 20 million illegals is practical. That or we have to institute a shitload of administrative law courts to issue deportation orders to people who for the most part already have deportation orders.
There aren't that many.
This is not a subject on which FAIR can be trusted.Pretty close...
https://www.fairus.org/issue/how-many-illegal-aliens-are-united-states-2025-update
As of March 2025, FAIR estimates that approximately 18.6 million illegal aliens reside in the United States. This is 11 percent higher than our June 2023 illegal alien population estimate of 16.8 million.
This is not a subject on which FAIR can be trusted.
Because this is what FAIR is. There is nothing in which they can be trusted.Why? And do be sure to substantiate your assertion with something more substantial than yet another simple sentence.
Because this is what FAIR is.