ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 19,722
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You must be in a good mood today?
Trump has done what no president has been able to ever followed through with. This embarrassing level just might deter the Russians from continuing their onslaught.
Point out any previously successful president demanding increases in defense spending from NATO members. More TDS on steroids. Your response lacks credibility.
The US is not abdicating its leadership role. Delegating areas of responsibilities and sharing the cost of those responsibilities equally is only fair for US taxpayers. NATO even admits to not paying their fair share. Western Europe has a 1 &1/2 time larger GDP than the US, funding doesn’t match up. Trump demanded a fair and equitable distribution of funding resources to make it fair for US taxpayers. AMERICA FIRST! something you wouldn’t know anything about.
Hope that ^helps
He also said he would look to provide additional systems to Ukraine. Figers crossed it's not just more yap yap yap. We'll see
View attachment 2550899
Are you kidding me? This is CNN’s fact check. NATO members whistling past the graveyard. That fucking attitude that it’s only guidelines has pissed me off for decades. If it doesn’t require NATO members to pay their fair share in their own defense then it’s not a requirement for the US to come to their aid. Fuck them. I totally agree with Trump on this. He’s been threatening NATO since 2017 or thereabouts. This CNN fact check is actually supporting Trump’s claim. Thank God for Poland for setting the example. If the US is attacked by China what’s NATO going to do for us? Other than limited naval power from France and England NOTHING, we’re on our own. The US total National Guard is larger than the whole Canadian military. Canada is supposed to be patrolling the Artic region, they are not doing enough. They like others have not met the 2% for years. That’s part of the reason they can afford free healthcare and we can’t. IMHO
ineedhelp1 needs to slurp MOAR orange toadstool.
Here’s a good read on NATO spending and what events have precipitated increases in spending by European members of NATO (Spoiler: The increases in spending by European NATO members were NOT because of DonOld’s strong arming, but because of geopolitical realities - Russia invading Crimea in 2014 & Eastern Ukraine in 2022, the rising threat from China, Iran, North Korea, Cyber attacks, etc):
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/02/13/politics/fact-check-trump-nato
Hope that ^ helps.
ineedhelp1
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()
Are you kidding me? This is CNN’s fact check. NATO members whistling past the graveyard. That fucking attitude that it’s only guidelines has pissed me off for decades. If it doesn’t require NATO members to pay their fair share in their own defense then it’s not a requirement for the US to come to their aid. Fuck them. I totally agree with Trump on this. He’s been threatening NATO since 2017 or thereabouts. This CNN fact check is actually supporting Trump’s claim. Thank God for Poland for setting the example. If the US is attacked by China what’s NATO going to do for us? Other than limited naval power from France and England NOTHING, we’re on our own. The US total National Guard is larger than the whole Canadian military. Canada is supposed to be patrolling the Artic region, they are not doing enough. They like others have not met the 2% for years. That’s part of the reason they can afford free healthcare and we can’t. IMHO
Facts First: All of these Trump claims are false. While a majority of NATO members do not meet the alliance’s target of each member spending a minimum of 2% of gross domestic product on defense, the 2% target is a “guideline” that does not create bills, debts or legal obligations if it is not met. In fact, the guideline doesn’t require payments to NATO or the US at all. Rather, it simply requires each country to spend on their own defense programs.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tru...t-missiles-after-zelenskyy/story?id=123199009
The accolades President Trump received today represents a dramatic contrast from last year’s NATO Summit where Dementia Joe could barely stay awake.
As Lazaran has noted many times, the one-term former president was so exhausted from the summit and a brief stop in California, that even after a full week of rest and recovery, he was still so weak that he was incoherent in his debate with Trump. It literally marked the end of his presidency.
Hope you’ve recovered from last year’s trip Joe. What a difference a year makes!![]()
You got that right! Called him Daddy. I also tip my hat to you for nailing it when you said Dementia Joe’s debate faceplant was because he was still wiped out a full week after his NATO Summit and CA trip.
Rutte was slathering the flattery so thick on DonOld
You got that right! Called him Daddy. I also tip my hat to you for nailing it when you said Dementia Joe’s debate faceplant was because he was still wiped out a full week after his NATO Summit and CA trip.
Rutte was slathering the flattery so thick on DonOld’s prodigious orange ass that it became a topic of discussion around the world
(even DonOld seemed to slump inward upon himself while Rutte was laying on the clearly obsequious praise).
![]()
![]()
Everybody that isn’t a MAGAt cultist sees what Rutte AND Pakistan are doing by praising DonOld like one would a petulant, repugnant, underachieving rich child that wields some power due to their position.
DonOld is such a good boy.
DonOld is very special.
BabyBoobs
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()
Rutte was slathering the flattery so thick on DonOld’s prodigious orange ass that it became a topic of discussion around the world. Everybody that isn’t a MAGAt cultist sees what Rutte AND Pakistan are doing by praising DonOld ......
Bears repeating.Isn't it stupid to key defense spending to GDP? A country's ability to pay has no connection to how much defense is needed by that country or its allies.


People give 47 praise because dear.leader only reacts to praiseNATO chief at the Trump Summit delivers praise and gratitude for the president’s leadership.
NATO suggests that Russia can sustain the war at its current pace until 2027. Of course, I may be accused of being sympathetic to Ukraine and having a biased opinion, but let’s look at the facts—what’s wrong with this statement? The Russian war machine currently relies on Soviet-era equipment reserves, a large number of soldiers, and the National Wealth Fund...
"The unfortunate part in this is that you don't understand war at all."The unfortunate part in this is that you don't understand war at all. As Russia depletes its internal resources, it will seek to supplement them from outside Russia. They will turn to China and North Korea and form a war alliance in which both of those countries will send massive amounts of equipment and personnel into Russia and then onto Ukraine. Not the dribble NK has invested as a test, but two entire armies fully invested in "the cause."
This will resupply Russia with fresh troops and equipment, as well as continue to further pound Ukraine into submission as these soldiers gain battle experience and their tofu based equipment improves to combat quality instead of only showmanship.
Ukraine hasn't seen nothing yet. And, unless NATO gets boots on the ground, Ukraine is toast.
If you're listening to the legacy media, you're listening to propaganda.I don't listen to propaganda nor do I admire autocratic dictators.
Except the Spanish, they will be made to pay in other ways.Trump didn't go there to make friends and he's respected for it. Almost everyone is on board with 5%, no other president had the intestinal fortitude to lay the law down. Canada had better take notice. IMHO
The unfortunate part in this is that you don't understand war at all.....