Safe_Bet
No she's not back I'm Amy
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Posts
- 8,663
And yes... By definition, the fact that they are lesbians makes this research biased. My problem isn't with that but IN COMBINATION with a poorly designed study, the evidence is garbage.
And THAT sir is just a FINE example of homophobia!
ho·mo·pho·bia
Pronunciation: \ˌhō-mə-ˈfō-bē-ə\
Function: noun
Date: 1969
: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals
Because a couple of the researchers are lesbians YOU decide, in direct conflict with people who actually KNOW what the fuck they are talking about, like the medical journal "Pediatrics" and their peer reviews, that the study is garbage. (and without even READING the damn thing to see the methodology used).
So, instead of facts, you decide that because they are lesbians that they are biased and the study is garbage. Do you also think the same thing about the thousands of studies of sexuality done by hetero researchers?
Dude, your logic has more holes in than Swiss cheese. Saying the study is biased because of the researchers orientation is as ignorant as NOM and the freakin Mormons trying to overturn the Prop 8 decision because the judge was gay.
Last edited:
