How do Christians negatively affect your life?

To summarize, Christians bother you because they proselytize yet you celebrate the birth of Christ with your Roman Catholic father. Doesn't his proselytizing bother you?

Girl scouts selling cookies outside of Walmart must bother the shit out of you. Lol. :)
1. I dont celebrate the birth of Christ. I simply go to enjoy food and time with ym family, as I mentioned previously
2. My father certainly does not proselytize and dont pretend you know him, or me for that matter
3. Christians CAN bother me WHEN they proselytize and/or when they claim to be righteous and yet have hatred n their hearts for others/are racists, cheat on spouses, are pedophiles, whatever it may be...which goes against the very fabric of your mythical lord and savior Jesus Christ's teachings and actions

I dont really care for their cookies so I tend to ignore Girl Scouts usually
 
neither is Star Wars. Or Jurassic Park. Or Severance, Westwood, Deadwood, The Sopranos, The Wire, The Morning Show, Plur1bus, Ted Lasso, The Godfather, Shawshank Redemption, Amelie, Trainspotting, Silo, Rocky, Minority Report, Interview with the Vampire, Hoosiers, Enders Game, Bourne Identity, Casino Royale, Aliens, The Avengers, Seinfeld, MASH, Cosby Show, How I Met Your Mother, Friends, Game of Thrones, whatever

whats yer fucking point?
they are tv shows and movies. Some are based in reality, some are not.

NEXT

My point is that you Lit idjits continuously reference fiction as if it's real. It's not. It's a script where all the characters have to act/speak in certain ways to get to the preconceived outcome. Case in point, in your link you assert that the President character shut down the other character by what was said. What you don't understand is that in real life there are likely valid rebuttals that could be offered to excuse whatever was done by the character who was shut down. Rebuttals which aren't in the script because that might/probably would result in a different outcome.

For instance, in one particularly noteworthy scene from that TV series, the president comes into a room and everyone except some woman stands up like they're supposed to. El Presidente reams the woman for not standing up. Which is great given the script and it's preconceived outcome, but in real life you don't have to stand if you're unable to do so because you're handicapped. Something not mentioned in the script nor done in the shot because that would alter the ending.

Yet you seem to think that all that fiction is real and that you get to use it as fact when it's not. Which is why you're an idjit.
 
I have a slight problem with people who hate Christians but celebrate Christmas. :)
I dont hate Christians. I dont care for hypocrites, as well as the people actively trying to convert me by proselytizing...of any faith, but in ym experience its only been certain denominations of Christianity
 
My point is that you Lit idjits continuously reference fiction as if it's real. It's not. It's a script where all the characters have to act/speak in certain ways to get to the preconceived outcome. Case in point, in your link you assert that the President character shut down the other character by what was said. What you don't understand is that in real life there are likely valid rebuttals that could be offered to excuse whatever was done by the character who was shut down. Rebuttals which aren't in the script because that might/probably would result in a different outcome.

For instance, in one particularly noteworthy scene from that TV series, the president comes into a room and everyone except some woman stands up like they're supposed to. El Presidente reams the woman for not standing up. Which is great given the script and it's preconceived outcome, but in real life you don't have to stand if you're unable to do so because you're handicapped. Something not mentioned in the script nor done in the shot because that would alter the ending.

Yet you seem to think that all that fiction is real and that you get to use it as fact when it's not. Which is why you're an idjit.
the scene about people not standing is the scene I posted atually and she was not physically incapable of standing.

Also, not germane to the discussion at hand
 
What do you get when you cross a Unitarian with a Jehovah's Witness?

Something that knocks on your door for no particular reason!
 
My point is that you Lit idjits continuously reference fiction as if it's real. It's not. It's a script where all the characters have to act/speak in certain ways to get to the preconceived outcome. Case in point, in your link you assert that the President character shut down the other character by what was said. What you don't understand is that in real life there are likely valid rebuttals that could be offered to excuse whatever was done by the character who was shut down. Rebuttals which aren't in the script because that might/probably would result in a different outcome.

For instance, in one particularly noteworthy scene from that TV series, the president comes into a room and everyone except some woman stands up like they're supposed to. El Presidente reams the woman for not standing up. Which is great given the script and it's preconceived outcome, but in real life you don't have to stand if you're unable to do so because you're handicapped. Something not mentioned in the script nor done in the shot because that would alter the ending.

Yet you seem to think that all that fiction is real and that you get to use it as fact when it's not. Which is why you're an idjit.
No superstition is 'more real' than some fiction on TV.
 
the scene about people not standing is the scene I posted atually and she was not physically incapable of standing.

Because that would change the pre written outcome, hence not a true reflection of reality.

Also, not germane to the discussion at hand

Then why did you raise the issue?

In the end you believe fiction is real when the truth is that it's just a pleasing lie told for entertainment purposes. Believing in that lie as truth or even a semblance of truth is why you're an idjit.
 
Because that would change the pre written outcome, hence not a true reflection of reality.



Then why did you raise the issue?

In the end you believe fiction is real when the truth is that it's just a pleasing lie told for entertainment purposes. Believing in that lie as truth or even a semblance of truth is why you're an idjit.
actually, I referenced the bulk of the scene which was the hypocrisy of the religious right.
You chose to utilize the last part of the video. Fine by me, it was on the table, but it has nothing to do with the thread.
 
actually, I referenced the bulk of the scene which was the hypocrisy of the religious right.
You chose to utilize the last part of the video. Fine by me, it was on the table, but it has nothing to do with the thread.

Then why did you raise the issue?

Basically you're doing what you usually do, you're denying your own past posts because they refute what you're trying to say now.
 
For instance, in one particularly noteworthy scene from that TV series, the president comes into a room and everyone except some woman stands up like they're supposed to. El Presidente reams the woman for not standing up. Which is great given the script and it's preconceived outcome, but in real life you don't have to stand if you're unable to do so because you're handicapped.
Except the woman wasn't handicapped. She was just being a cunt.

Interesting, though, to find a MAGA suddenly so solicitous of the handicapped!
 
Then why did you raise the issue?

Basically you're doing what you usually do, you're denying your own past posts because they refute what you're trying to say now.
once again, didnt raise the issue. you did. i questioned why since it makes no sense to this thread.
 
Where have I been a bigot or racist?
Please link to that post.
Ill wait.

Do you REALLY not understand that when you say you don't like Christians you're acting like a bigot? And, since you referenced "white Christians" that makes you a racist too.

Because if you really don't understand that you need to log off the internet permanently and check into a mental health hospital.
 
Do you REALLY not understand that when you say you don't like Christians you're acting like a bigot? And, since you referenced "white Christians" that makes you a racist too.

Because if you really don't understand that you need to log off the internet permanently and check into a mental health hospital.
I didnt say I dont like Christians.
Please link that post.
 
Listen you bigoted/racist shit stain, it was YOUR FUCKING LINK.
once again, you raised the issue. i referenced the religious aspect. which was pertinent to this thread. you mentioned the physically challenged aspect. whcih i said has no relevance.

name calling is fun, apparently i get under your skin. i love you too.
 
Fuck me. You've got to be a troll from a troll farm with multiple idjits posting at the same time.
or jsut actually stand by your post and link to where i said i dislike christians or christianity.
i said i dont like the people who proselytize and/or hypocrites etc
 
Back
Top