madelinemasoch
Masoch's 2nd Cumming
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2022
- Posts
- 767
I don't like a lot of "fantasy" as a writer. Meaning, I don't want the erotic core of the thing to totally take over the entire setting and all of its characters and just make it all one big unified whole with no conflicts or problems or enemies and adversaries to the good light thing that I'm encouraging in the stories. I hope that makes sense. For example, if I have a character who's a poor white man and blames it on immigrants when it's actually his boss's fault, and then he becomes a cuckold to his wife who's having sex with an immigrant, I wouldn't want the immigrants to also then fuck his boss's wife. I would want to portray the boss as the actual opposing force to both his prosperity and his cuckoldry, for example by making the boss even more racist and prudish and misogynistic. I find the opposite oftentimes happens and there's a temptation there to do that kind of thing on this site because (within site guidelines) anything goes and slathering on more of the specific "kink" for lack of a better term that you have on offer in the story will probably get your story more praise and attention, even if that means sacrificing either the integrity to the original idea for the story or the quality of its writing, which in my opinion go hand in hand anyway. I think this is how you get "black man fucks the whole family" stories and shit like this coming out on here.
It's my opinion that a lot of the stories on this site do this sacrificial deal with the devil (the market) so to speak–I'm not interested in idle chatter that justifies that state of affairs, by the way, so please don't tell me "that's just the way it is and we can't do nuffin about it"–and I find that phenomenon fascinating to see exactly how it got this way. I say all this to say I have a reason for not allowing "fantasy" to take over the story, and that's because the ideas do not want to be stereotypical or unrealistic beyond the boundaries that they set for themselves. There's a certain self-constructed standard that unfolds in my ideas for stories that I do not want to violate for fear of ruining the idea. I would rather polish and nourish what it is they want to be rather than try and force changes upon them in the writing that would affect the authenticity and quality of the piece. I think if you have so much sexual fantasy guiding the writing, it drags the actual story you write away from the original idea you had. What about you?
It's my opinion that a lot of the stories on this site do this sacrificial deal with the devil (the market) so to speak–I'm not interested in idle chatter that justifies that state of affairs, by the way, so please don't tell me "that's just the way it is and we can't do nuffin about it"–and I find that phenomenon fascinating to see exactly how it got this way. I say all this to say I have a reason for not allowing "fantasy" to take over the story, and that's because the ideas do not want to be stereotypical or unrealistic beyond the boundaries that they set for themselves. There's a certain self-constructed standard that unfolds in my ideas for stories that I do not want to violate for fear of ruining the idea. I would rather polish and nourish what it is they want to be rather than try and force changes upon them in the writing that would affect the authenticity and quality of the piece. I think if you have so much sexual fantasy guiding the writing, it drags the actual story you write away from the original idea you had. What about you?