It's "Twitter Freedom Friday!"

[Lazaran]

Some of the laptop data has been authenticated. The New York Post allegations have not.

BabyBoobs apparently can’t access legitimate news stories that provide important context and perspective on the timeline / chain of events involving “Hunter’s laptop”.

BabyBoobs engages in conflation and forms conclusions based on self admitted incomplete information.

That ^ is why decent, intelligent people and at BabyBoobs.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

BabyBoobs apparently can’t access legitimate news stories that provide important context and perspective on the timeline / chain of events involving “Hunter’s laptop”.

That ^ is why decent, intelligent people and at BabyBoobs.

Washington Post, New York Times, and CBS News hired independent digital forensic experts to evaluate the emails cited in the NY Post story. They reported that those independent analysts validated the authenticity. The FBI, which has been in possession of the laptop all along, has not denied the authenticity. Nor has Hunter.

 

[Lazaran]

BabyBoobs thinks repeating incomplete information proves…..something ?

That ^ is like saying water is made of Hydrogen. Full stop.

Sure water IS made of Hydrogen, BUT there IS a pretty important “element” missing.

And no, it isn’t Carbon.

 

[phrodeau]

Washington Post, New York Times, and CBS News hired independent digital forensic experts to evaluate the emails cited in the NY Post story. They reported that those independent analysts validated the authenticity. The FBI, which has been in possession of the laptop all along, has not denied the authenticity. Nor has Hunter.

Uh huh. Some of the laptop data has been authenticated. The New York Post allegations have not.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

BabyBoobs thinks repeating incomplete information proves…..something ?

That ^ is like saying water is made of Hydrogen. Full stop.

Sure water IS made of Hydrogen, BUT there IS a pretty important “element” missing.

And no, it isn’t Carbon.

Are the emails published in the 10/20 NY Post story authentic or not?

 

[Lazaran]

Is water made of Hydrogen or not ?

BabyBoobs

 

[phrodeau]

Is it OK to publish someone’s emails without their permission or not?

 

[Lazaran]

Is it OK to publish someone’s emails without their permission or not?

For “republicans” it appears to be “OK” when exercised selectively / situationally to advance their narrative/ agenda, but “NOT OK” in ALL other circumstances.

SAD!!!

 

[Lazaran]

Also for BabyBoob’s reading pleasure: (if BabyBoobs can access it).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

That ^ article does NOT support BabyBoob’s argument or conclusions.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Is it OK to publish someone’s emails without their permission or not?

Yes, emails can be published without permission of either the sender or recipient.

 

[Rotadom]

Sums up the the fanboys of corporate authoritarians here.

View attachment 2195892

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Also for BabyBoob’s reading pleasure: (if BabyBoobs can access it).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

That ^ article does NOT support BabyBoob’s argument or conclusions.

Nice try!

“Both Green and Williams said the Burisma emails they verified cryptographically were likely to be authentic, but they cautioned that if the company was hacked, it would be possible to fake cryptographic signatures — something much less likely to happen with Google.
One of the verified emails from Pozharskyi, which was the focus of one of the initial stories from the New York Post, was written on April 17, 2015. It thanked Hunter Biden “for inviting me to DC and giving me an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together.”

 

[Lazaran]

BabyBoobs needs to READ and COMPREHEND the WHOLE article.

Even the tiny bit BabyBoobs cherry picked doesn’t say what BabyBoobs THINKS it does:

A person thanking someone for INVITING them and giving them an OPPORTUNITY to meet someone else does NOT mean that any meeting actually occurred.

Reading comprehension is clearly NOT BabyBoob’s strong suit.

BabyBoobs

 

[phrodeau]

Pozharskyi is not someone a politician should ever have dinner with. Unlike Nick Fuentes.

 

[Lazaran]

Pozharskyi is not someone a politician should ever have dinner with. Unlike Nick Fuentes.

I won’t even give BabyBoobs that much.

With all BabyBoob’s posturing about “Hunter’s laptop”, that one vague e-mail is THE smoking gun that proves…..something?

GMAFB

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

BabyBoobs needs to READ and COMPREHEND the WHOLE article.


A person thanking someone for INVITING them and giving them an OPPORTUNITY to meet someone else does NOT mean that any meeting actually occurred.

Yes, he WAS invited. By Hunter. Unclear if the meeting took place. Sounds like it. Has there been any denials from Hunter or the WH? Thanks for confirming the authenticity of the email.

 

[Lazaran]

Yes, BabyBoobs, President Biden / his representatives denied ever having a “meeting” with your guy.

Is it possible that he was unknowingly briefly in the presence of someone Hunter was trying to impress????

Who the fuck knows.

So BabyBoobs, you’re welcome, your order for a NOTHING. BURGER is confirmed.

Add to cart???

BabyBoobs

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Yes, BabyBoobs, President Biden’s / his representatives denied ever having a “meeting” with your guy.

Is it possible that he was unknowingly briefly in the presence of someone Hunter was trying to impress????

Who the fuck knows.

Thanks again for confirming the authenticity of the email. Biden originally claimed it was Russian disinformation. And thanks for confirming that Hunter was peddling access to his father. Joe’s campaign said a records search indicated no such meeting occurred. Not exactly a denial. Are you saying Joe never discussed Hunter’s business with his son? Never met with his business associates?

 

[ll74]

Thanks again for confirming the authenticity of the email. Biden originally claimed it was Russian disinformation. And thanks for confirming that Hunter was peddling access to his father. Joe’s campaign said a records search indicated no such meeting occurred. Not exactly a denial. Are you saying Joe never discussed Hunter’s business with his son? Never met with his business associates?

Biden did not claim the email was disinformation. Hunter was the son of the VP and was a drug addict. Like Jared Kushner, he cashed in on his position.

The meeting in question still has never been confirmed outside of a website crawler and a social media post which somebody decided we're connected.

As for Joe's knowledge.....if you've ever known an addict, you would understand that knowledge is suspect in every case.

 

[Lazaran]

BabyBoobs and the “Seinfeld” e-mail.

Jerry: “What does the e-mail prove???”

George: “It’s an e-mail that proves nothing.”

BabyBoobs

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Biden did not claim the email was disinformation. Hunter was the son of the VP and was a drug addict. Like Jared Kushner, he cashed in on his position.

The meeting in question still has never been confirmed outside of a website crawler and a social media post which somebody decided we're connected.

As for Joe's knowledge.....if you've ever known an addict, you would understand that knowledge is suspect in every case.

Thanks for confirming drug addict Hunter was peddling access to his father. Some on this thread refuse to acknowledge that. Also for confirming the authenticity of the email on the laptop. Joe denied it in the October 2022 debate he cited the now-debunked claims of former intelligence officials that it was Russian disinformation.

 

[Lazaran]

Thanks for confirming drug addict Hunter was peddling access to his father. Some on this thread refuse to acknowledge that. Also for confirming the authenticity of the email on the laptop. Joe denied it in the October 2022 debate he cited the now-debunked claims of former intelligence officials that it was Russian disinformation.

Quoted for posterity and to show BabyBoob’s stupidity.

“The October 2022 debate???”

BabyBoobs

Again, that one Seinfeld “e-mail that proves nothing” is the best BabyBoobs can do.

BabyBoobs

 

[Rotadom]

To even pretend that this is going anywhere near how Musk wanted it to go is disingenuous bullshit.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

“The October 2022 debate

Good catch. Thanks.

 

[Lazaran]

To even pretend that this is going anywhere near how Musk wanted it to go is disingenuous bullshit.

The idiots on the right with a tiny shred of self respect have abandoned “the cause” and the chat after realizing “the twitter files” wasn’t a molehill worth dying on. And after realizing Elon is as petulant and pathetic as UnderDon.

That ^ explains why BabyBoobs is still soldiering away.

BabyBoobs

See also: Elon’s proposed “Social Credit” rating system.

BabyBoobs