Karmelo Anthony

Starving hyena and starving leopard fighting over the gazelle scraps the lions left just to watch the nuisance animals destroy themselves.
 
You've proved that multiple times here.
Show me. Calling a convicted murderer a convicted murderer is not bigotry; it is the sort of plain statement of fact that increasingly alarms people who have grown accustomed to treating truth as a negotiable commodity.
 
Here is a video study that touches on the wild ass problem:

Imagine if all races and cultures all came here willingly and were given the same opportunities for 400 years.

I know. Your brain is not capable of thought exercise.
 
Imagine if all races and cultures all came here willingly and were given the same opportunities for 400 years.

I know. Your brain is not capable of thought exercise.
Your difficulty is not imagining hypothetical histories; it is mistaking them for evidence. One can imagine any number of alternate worlds in which every variable is neatly arranged to support a preferred conclusion. The challenge comes when one must return to reality and defend that conclusion with facts. As for my alleged inability to perform a thought exercise, I have noticed that people are most inclined to question the intelligence of others immediately after abandoning the burden of proving their own case.

Here's a "thought exercise" for you. The American Indian was here for thousands of years before the white man, what did they build? What did the sub-Saharan African build in the thousands of years before the Arab and the white man arrived?
 
Lol
This thread devolved exactly how I expected it to.
 
Imagine if all races and cultures all came here willingly and were given the same opportunities for 400 years.

I know. Your brain is not capable of thought exercise.

Imagine if we could admit we sold our own people into slavery...
 
Your difficulty is not imagining hypothetical histories; it is mistaking them for evidence. One can imagine any number of alternate worlds in which every variable is neatly arranged to support a preferred conclusion. The challenge comes when one must return to reality and defend that conclusion with facts. As for my alleged inability to perform a thought exercise, I have noticed that people are most inclined to question the intelligence of others immediately after abandoning the burden of proving their own case.

Here's a "thought exercise" for you. The American Indian was here for thousands of years before the white man, what did they build? What did the sub-Saharan African build in the thousands of years before the Arab and the white man arrived?
Tell me you never read "Guns, Germs, and Steel" without telling me you never read it.
 
How’s that electron fraud for 2020 going???

Where is your evidence?? Or just some hypothetical history.

We know you have no evidence.
Haitians eating pets. He actually said that in a live Presidential debate after being told it was bullshit by that city's Mayor.

And Reichguide still voted for that crazy senile dipshit.
 

🙄

Except the FACTS in evidence show that a rainstorm hit the track meet, and the kid with the knife was simply seeking shelter from the rain when dead Billy Badass and another goon that was also much bigger than the kid with the knife decided to "protect their territory" by trying to shove the kid with the knife out into the rain.

😑

Oops.

“God made man. Samuel Colt made all men equal” (although in this case it was whoever made that knife).

Also:

"STAND YOUR GROUND!!!" (unless you’re black, of course).

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Back
Top