He had contributions of over $600,000. Now he claims he lacks the funds to hire a lawyer for his appeal. Evidently, the money flowed elsewhere, Mom acquired a new house, Grandma a new car, and the legal defense fund achieved the rare distinction of defending everyone except the defendant.
There is no bigotry here. The only thing seriously bent out of shape is your perception, which appears to have taken a permanent leave of reality. What is on display is your mind, so eager to find offense that it manufactures it in the absence of raw materials.
Those are the feral, untamed, breeding mares, who pop these kids out for SNAP benefits, raise them in their ignorant image, and then turn the demons loose to pillage civil society, where their economic impact is undeniable. They generate work for judges, lawyers, probation officers, prison administrators, and tax collectors, leaving the law-abiding citizen with the honor of financing the entire enterprise.
Are.you wanting to use a different word, perhaps?
Yet another "Black Lives Matter" scam. It seems that they'll never learn (the suckers sending the $$$$).
Because of what happened at both ends of this issue. A black-on-white racist murder that, if roles were reversed, a white man would have gotten either life or the chair. In this case, the murderer could do 15 years or even less for his murder of a white boy. Then we have Karmelo's family in the street screaming about racism and their son being railroaded by an "all-white jury." Karmelo will end up living a full life. The victim's family will never see their loved one again. It was a theater of absurd ignorance and nonsense.
The roles were reversed when Zimmerman killed Trayvon Martin.
He could be paroled after 17.5 years and could conceivably be out before then. He will live a full life.
Not really. Trayvon Martin was a thug just like Anthony. Zimmerman killed Martin in real self-defense, and he was acquitted by a jury of his peers.
Lol. You don't even see your racism. Amazing.
Did you follow the trial? What is racist about what I said?
Like I said before, it's all they have.................name calling from a vacant cranial cavity.
So what are you suggesting about Karmelo and his racial background with this thread?
He arrives in every discussion already in possession of the truth, or what he takes to be a satisfactory imitation of it. Facts strike him not as useful information but as hostile intrusions upon a settled narrative. He mistakes confidence for expertise, repetition for proof, and indignation for intelligence. Listening to him is like standing downhill from a manure spreader: one quickly recognizes the product, appreciates its volume, and sees little point in arguing with the machinery.
I'm suggesting that he isn't a folk hero; he's both a demon and an insult to his race, as are his grifting parents who, through their ignorance and irresponsibility, unleashed him upon civil society. They made this about race from the very beginning. They have proven themselves to be a disgrace to their race. Now Karmelo's supporters are threatening the lives of the victim's family, proving the racist credentials I have laid at their feet. Pointing out that simple truth doesn't make me a racist or a bigot.
What does this have to do with Islam?
Are you suggesting you didn't make it about race?
You answered my question already....it is about race to you.
But this thread isn't about that.
Providing facts does not make one a bigot or a racist. Collating certain facts and providing denigrating commentary about groups of people relating to those facts suggests that you are one.
George Zimmerman shot and killed a Black kid after the Black kid assaulted him. Found Not Guilty of murder.
Only in the small confines of your racist mind. You see the racist boogeyman everywhere. The entire Anthony family's message is all about their "race," and the alleged "racism" they blame for their son's incarceration. They separate themselves from normal American society with their lies, actions, and racist mindset. Why didn't Karmelo testify on his own behalf? We know why. He didn't testify because he and his legal team knew they could not meet the legal elements of self-defense. Which are as follows:
If there is a racial element to this controversy, it has been supplied chiefly by those who have spent months misrepresenting the facts, denouncing the trial as racist, and vilifying the Metcalf family. Unable to refute the evidence, they have taken refuge in the modern habit of converting every unwelcome outcome into a grievance and every disagreement into an accusation of prejudice. You've obviously attended the same indoctrination sessions they did. The most conspicuous racial rhetoric in this case has come from those insisting that race explains everything except their own conduct.
Lol...my point isn't about the perceived racism of the event and trial.
It is always impressive to encounter a man who can both declare a moral diagnosis and absolve himself of the need to demonstrate it. One is told the matter is settled, the conclusion obvious, and disagreement merely further evidence of guilt. It is a convenient system, though not especially useful for determining the truth, but a credible device for showcasing your lack of intellect and testosterone.
Did I mention Islam in this context?
