Karoline Leavitt

Dems also don't go around with a huge evangelical base either or proclaim themselves the party of morality, family values and the like. The Democrats never claimed that and certainly unlike the GOP are not hung up on demonizing people. The GOP is so in bed with the evangelicals that they have proven what Madison said 247 years ago or so, that when you mix church and state you get a corrupted church and an oppressive state.
So calling MAGA Nazis, Racist, Fascist, Pedos is not demonizing? What planet do you come from? Members of the GOP celebrating their faith has nothing to do with the separation of church and state. There are millions of Dems that practice their religious beliefs and values.
 
Those of you afflicted with TDS seem to delight in labeling the supporters of President Trump as “deplorables”. OTH, we admirers of the President view you as the “despicables”. FYI despicable is defined by Merriam-Webster dictionary as “deserving to be despised: so worthless or obnoxious as to rouse moral indignation”. Those of you in this thread who cast aspersions on the character and integrity of Karoline Leavitt, arguably the most forceful and successful Presidential Press Secretary of all time, fits that meaning on the money.
 
Karolyn married the older man and they now have two children. Quite different from the 2024 Democratic presidential candidate who, at age 29, dated a married 60 year old man who actually did use his power and influence to help her career.
Important point. Karoline is solid, Cackles is a meme.
 
Dems also don't go around with a huge evangelical base either or proclaim themselves the party of morality, family values and the like. The Democrats never claimed that and certainly unlike the GOP are not hung up on demonizing people. The GOP is so in bed with the evangelicals that they have proven what Madison said 247 years ago or so, that when you mix church and state you get a corrupted church and an oppressive state.
Instead, they praise the concept of socialism as the miracle cure to all our disappointments.
 
Those of you afflicted with TDS seem to delight in labeling the supporters of President Trump as “deplorables”. OTH, we admirers of the President view you as the “despicables”. FYI despicable is defined by Merriam-Webster dictionary as “deserving to be despised: so worthless or obnoxious as to rouse moral indignation”. Those of you in this thread who cast aspersions on the character and integrity of Karoline Leavitt, arguably the most forceful and successful Presidential Press Secretary of all time, fits that meaning on the money.
She a ho.
 
Dude, you said I claimed something. I asked you to show me where I said it

You still have not.

It's not that complicated


Sweety, no one fucking cares what your mental aberration is, just stop lying to yourself, and us by proxy, and shut the fuck up already.
 
Leav-itt has a new position, 'advisor to the president'. As a private citizen.

This is unconnected to Todd Blanche's decision that all advisors to the president have the same immunity from investigation that the president has.

Does that apply to me if I advise the president to fuck off?
 
Leav-itt has a new position, 'advisor to the president'. As a private citizen.

This is unconnected to Todd Blanche's decision that all advisors to the president have the same immunity from investigation that the president has.

Does that apply to me if I advise the president to fuck off?

You have a 1st Amendment Right to tell the President to fuck off.

That, however, doesn't give you immunity from the consequences if you improperly do so.

Because no one is above the law.

And of course, since you're you, and stupid as all fuck, THE LAW allows the advisor to the President to speak/advise in confidence and carries all of the immunity inherent in such speech/advice. Blanche's advice in this regard follows Constitutional intent and legal precedent so it's not unusual or even "new."

What's funny is that I'm sure that you'd NEVER say that the law should be ignored so that you could punish or prosecute someone for obeying the law. Right? In fact, I'm sure you wouldn't even infer such a thing obliquely... right?

Because you're all about the idea that no one is above the law, especially those who would misstate or omit the actual law for personal/political advantage or vengeful animas. Right?
 
and what particular ways that "violate the law"?

I mean, I know what you can't "cry fire in a movie theater", but what else?

Since I'm not your lawyer, NOR WILL I EVER BE, I decline to give you free legal advice over the internet other than to say;

1. Hire a lawyer and ask them your questions; or,
2. FAFO.

Your choice.
 
Back
Top