Obama leaving more shit on Trump's table.

[Ishmael]

Watch out, Jimi! You will be called sweet cheeks in a condescending tone if you stray off topic again. At least you got a warning.

See what I mean Jimi?

Ishmael

 

[phrodeau]

Why they aren't killing American sailors?
Because they are mostly shooting inland, I suppose. That's where the bad guys are.

That's where their fellow citizens are.

 

[Bookishleigh]

See what I mean Jimi?

Ishmael

Us women folk.....we're just too simple-minded to stay on task. The only thing we should be putting on the table is dinner.

 

[Greypowerful]

Watch out, Jimi! You will be called sweet cheeks in a condescending tone if you stray off topic again. At least you got a warning.

Thanks for the concern, Dazzling Person.

Ish & I go back a LOOOONG time. Sometimes on opposite sides of an issue, sometimes not so far apart.

And of course, the fun of a Red Herring feast.

 

[Greypowerful]

See what I mean Jimi?

Ishmael

But Damnit, Cap'n... she's an attractive lass! Challenging, but attractive, all the same...

 

[Bookishleigh]

But Damnit, Cap'n... she's an attractive lass! Challenging, but attractive, all the same...

Awww, well thank you. Maybe once you get an av up I can pay you the same compliment. But back to the conversation at hand. Will Trump listen to his advisors or will he go rogue?

Only time and his twitter account will tell.

 

[Ishmael]

Us women folk.....we're just too simple-minded to stay on task. The only thing we should be putting on the table is dinner.

Well I'm glad that you finally snapped to the fact that the term "Sweet Cheeks" was meant to be condescending and , I might add, fully in keeping with my New Years resolution. You were a little slow on the uptake, but you finally got there.

And now that you played the 'gender card' what next? After all that battling for 'equality' you don't like being treated as an equal? Further, "Sweet Cheeks" is gender neutral. I can readily see Neil Patrick Harris fondly referring to his husband/wife as "Sweet Cheeks." It's all in the tone, not the gender.

And I'm sure that you thought that you had whipped out a game winning 'trump card' (A phrase that is going to take on new meanings in the years to come) with that post, I can assure you you didn't. You just can't have it both ways-----------sweet cheeks.

Ishmael

 

[Queertag45]

Well I'm glad that you finally snapped to the fact that the term "Sweet Cheeks" was meant to be condescending and , I might add, fully in keeping with my New Years resolution. You were a little slow on the uptake, but you finally got there.

And now that you played the 'gender card' what next? After all that battling for 'equality' you don't like being treated as an equal? Further, "Sweet Cheeks" is gender neutral. I can readily see Neil Patrick Harris fondly referring to his husband/wife as "Sweet Cheeks." It's all in the tone, not the gender.

And I'm sure that you thought that you had whipped out a game winning 'trump card' (A phrase that is going to take on new meanings in the years to come) with that post, I can assure you you didn't. You just can't have it both ways-----------sweet cheeks.

Ishmael

Ah, it was all part of your plan. You're so sneaky. It's amazing that she was able to figure it out, being a woman and all.

 

[Disgustipated]

http://i.imgur.com/k8CHDWa.gif

 

[Bookishleigh]

Well I'm glad that you finally snapped to the fact that the term "Sweet Cheeks" was meant to be condescending and , I might add, fully in keeping with my New Years resolution. You were a little slow on the uptake, but you finally got there.

And now that you played the 'gender card' what next? After all that battling for 'equality' you don't like being treated as an equal? Further, "Sweet Cheeks" is gender neutral. I can readily see Neil Patrick Harris fondly referring to his husband/wife as "Sweet Cheeks." It's all in the tone, not the gender.

And I'm sure that you thought that you had whipped out a game winning 'trump card' (A phrase that is going to take on new meanings in the years to come) with that post, I can assure you you didn't. You just can't have it both ways-----------sweet cheeks.

Ishmael

Oh, I picked up on the fact that you're condescending towards all women that serve no purpose to you - and I serve no purpose to you but that is of my own choosing.

The only person who has been slow on the uptake here has been you (there's no need for you to respond....blah, blah, blah) ....but we don't need to discuss that in a public forum.

 

[Ishmael]

Oh, I picked up on the fact that you're condescending towards all women that serve no purpose to you - and I serve no purpose to you but that is of my own choosing.

The only person who has been slow on the uptake here has been you....but we don't need to discuss that in a public forum.

Another attempt to whip out a 'trump card?' Your opinion not withstanding my track record is quite the contrary here. Perhaps you have me confused with Lance?

Ishmael

 

[Bookishleigh]

Another attempt to whip out a 'trump card?' Your opinion not withstanding my track record is quite the contrary here. Perhaps you have me confused with Lance?

Ishmael

Look at Casanova being all witty with the "trump card."

But back to the topic at hand....since Trump is picking advisors like his son-in-law, I don't think we really have to "worry" about whether he's going to listen to them or not. Putin will likely tell him what to do.

 

[Greypowerful]

Look at Casanova being all witty with the "trump card."

But back to the topic at hand....since Trump is picking advisors like his son-in-law, I don't think we really have to "worry" about whether he's going to listen to them or not. Putin will likely tell him what to do.

As I said above... the REST of the "Free World" needs the US to be involved in keeping Russia and China within their present borders.

The Donald doesn't seem like he has much of a clue when it comes to the REALITY of global diplomacy.

We shall see..

 

[Ishmael]

Look at Casanova being all witty with the "trump card."

But back to the topic at hand....since Trump is picking advisors like his son-in-law, I don't think we really have to "worry" about whether he's going to listen to them or not. Putin will likely tell him what to do.

Kinda reminds ya of Ole John picking Robbie to be AJ. Deja fucking vu.

So what do you think of Obama moving an Armored Brigade up to the Polish-Russian border in the waning days of his administration? An appropriate response to the Russians trying to influence the US election(s)? A "line in the sand" for Trump to enforce?

Or how about this, Trump takes the appropriate action to defuse the situation and as soon as that happens the democrats and their willing lackeys in the press use that as "proof" that Trump is a "Manchurian Candidate?" An "enemy" of the republic.

It's not as if there isn't a historical precedent, Gaius Julius Caesar was another one of those populist leaders that was intent of overturning the elite status quo. I doubt that Trump is going to be assassinated on the Senate floor, but the knives are out already. We, as a general society, are far too sophisticated, and pansy ass, to commit actual murder, but there are enough out there that will be 'true' believers.

"May you live in interesting times."

Ishmael

 

[hashtag46]

Nevermind the fact that Obama waived prohibitions in the US Arms Export Control Act right after the syrian army liberated Aleppo.
Another hot bag of snakes

 

[hashtag46]

As I said above... the REST of the "Free World" needs the US to be involved in keeping Russia and China within their present borders.

The Donald doesn't seem like he has much of a clue when it comes to the REALITY of global diplomacy.

We shall see..

Are you some sort of spokesperson for them?

Nevermind that you quoted things straight from the "PC for the masses" playbook.

 

[Ishmael]

As I said above... the REST of the "Free World" needs the US to be involved in keeping Russia and China within their present borders.

The Donald doesn't seem like he has much of a clue when it comes to the REALITY of global diplomacy.

We shall see..

I'm certain we can count on you Canucks to back us up with your vast fleet of canoes and DeHaviland Beavers.

Ishmael

 

[thør]

I'm certain we can count on you Canucks to back us up with your vast fleet of canoes and DeHaviland Beavers.

Ishmael

Don't diss the DHC-2.

 

[Ishmael]

Don't diss the DHC-2.

Love it for what it is but in air to air engagements it's right up there with the Brewster Buffalo.

Ishmael

 

[thør]

Love it for what it is but in air to air engagements it's right up there with the Brewster Buffalo.

Ishmael

It's a fine aircraft. Thanks to the PW R985. 450 supercharged HP.

 

[hashtag46]

Does anyone think that Obama should feel more than two farts for Donald Trump?

RUFKM?
How about a shit sandwich the size of losing 600K jobs a month, $4.25 gasoline and a banking sector that just FAILED!?!
So yeah. This ill advised geopolitical chess move it trivial in comparison the to the failure of the last peaceful transition of the power of th Presidency.

These hasty decisions aren't easy to reverse and they carry with them the risk of a further escalation in tension internationally.
During a time when it's not exaggerated to say that the international atmosphere (re Russia and Syria and ISIS terrorist attacks elsewhere and so on) is close to pre-world war three levels.

 

[Ishmael]

It's a fine aircraft. Thanks to the PW R985. 450 supercharged HP.

And those quad 50's in the pods under the wings are damn sure intimidating.

Ishmael

 

[thør]

And those quad 50's in the pods under the wings are damn sure intimidating.

Ishmael

You're going to waste some meat.

 

[phrodeau]

These hasty decisions aren't easy to reverse and they carry with them the risk of a further escalation in tension internationally.
During a time when it's not exaggerated to say that the international atmosphere (re Russia and Syria and ISIS terrorist attacks elsewhere and so on) is close to pre-world war three levels.

Oh boo fucking hoo. Let Donald tweet about it. He'll make things better.

 

[hashtag46]

Oh boo fucking hoo. Let Donald tweet about it. He'll make things better.

Ah, I get it. You're trolling the thread.

But joke aside and no matter which side you guys are on (Trump, Obama) and which GBers is attacking and which GBers are reacting defensively:

This is a fascinating and real topic (things internationally are almost at a critical risk level) and it would be great if people paid it more attenrion.