LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Obama leaving more shit on Trump's table.

hashtag46 said:
Nevermind the "Que alt" jokes. I"d like to hear your views on what I said. Particularly from Pookie and Dsgustipated
"Obama waived prohibitions in the US Arms Export Control Act right after the syrian army liberated Aleppo.
Another hot bag of snakes."

What do you think that his reason was for instituting such a measure, and what consequences do you foresee (in Syria, that is)?

Are you able to come up with an opinion on that?
Click to expand...

Shut up, Query.
 
hashtag46 said:
Nevermind the "Que alt" jokes. I"d like to hear your views on what I said. Particularly from Pookie and Dsgustipated
"Obama waived prohibitions in the US Arms Export Control Act right after the syrian army liberated Aleppo.
Another hot bag of snakes."

What do you think that his reason was for instituting such a measure, and what consequences do you foresee (in Syria, that is)?

Are you able to come up with an opinion on that?
Click to expand...

Shut up, Query.
 
So you guys are unable to come up with a commentary about that statement that won't make you look like fools,

So you do what any reasonable person who feels out of their depth does:
"Those who lack the capacity, resort to trolling".
 
Last edited:
hashtag46 said:
So you guys are unable to come up with a commentary about that statement that won't make you look like fools,

So you do what any reasonable person who feels out of their depth does:
"Those who lack the capacity, resort to trolling".
Click to expand...

Que, this kind of post isn't Hashtag style. Take a nap and do a reset.
 
I only commented because I was shocked to see a thread that was being kept focused on topic, being interrupted by a concerted attack from so many trolls, on MOI :confused:

But it just occurred to me that you guys think that you found an ideal replacement for miles in me.

But rest asdurred, this is the last time when I'll engage you or feed into our trolling in such threads.
 
hashtag46 said:
I only commented because I was shocked to see a thread that was being kept focused on topic, being interrupted by a concerted attack from so many trolls, on MOI :confused:

But it just occurred to me that you guys think that you found an ideal replacement for miles in me.

But rest asdurred, this is the last time when I'll engage you or feed into our trolling in such threads.
Click to expand...
https://media.giphy.com/media/WIg8P0VNpgH8Q/giphy.gif
 
hashtag46 said:
I only commented because I was shocked to see a thread that was being kept focused on topic, being interrupted by a concerted attack from so many trolls, on MOI :confused:

But it just occurred to me that you guys think that you found an ideal replacement for miles in me.

But rest asdurred, this is the last time when I'll engage you or feed into our trolling in such threads.
Click to expand...

BULLSHIT!​

 
Conager said:
I didn't mean since his election I meant since Trump's election because all of his orders since then have been spiteful, small minded, destructive, and unnecessary.

We just had an election where the electorate said they were not interested in more of the same so he's going to hustle through some actions on his way out the door?
Click to expand...

Ah, I misunderstood. My apologies.

You're right. Most of it seems rather petty. Some may slow down Trump enough to minimize the changes he can make in the next two years. I think that's the strategy of the Dems. It has to be. What else do they have? Slow him down for two years. Make him look bad, and win back the Senate next time around.

Of course, they might try working WITH him to make those changes. That might win them some votes too.......but, nah, it'll never happen. The pattern is set. Changes come when one party controls everything. Otherwise, we're lucky to get a budget.
 
Ishmael said:
So what do you think of Obama moving an Armored Brigade up to the Polish-Russian border in the waning days of his administration? An appropriate response to the Russians trying to influence the US election(s)? A "line in the sand" for Trump to enforce?
Click to expand...

A largely routine military exercise.
 
Conager said:
I didn't mean since his election I meant since Trump's election because all of his orders since then have been spiteful, small minded, destructive, and unnecessary.

We just had an election where the electorate said they were not interested in more of the same so he's going to hustle through some actions on his way out the door?
Click to expand...

Who does he think he is, a North Carolina legislator?
 
sigh said:
Ah, I misunderstood. My apologies.

You're right. Most of it seems rather petty. Some may slow down Trump enough to minimize the changes he can make in the next two years. I think that's the strategy of the Dems. It has to be. What else do they have? Slow him down for two years. Make him look bad, and win back the Senate next time around.

Of course, they might try working WITH him to make those changes. That might win them some votes too.......but, nah, it'll never happen. The pattern is set. Changes come when one party controls everything. Otherwise, we're lucky to get a budget.
Click to expand...

Historically, a bad strategy to assume the Dems pick up many seats. Yes, historically the party out of power picks up some seats. Tip O'Neal knew he was going to lose the House to what became the Gingrich era, so he cut a deal with Reagen to give him his tax cuts, but delay them two years.

Americans are (justly) suspicious of single party rule. If it were close they could reasonably hope. However, Dems have trouble with turn-out in off year elections. Also, I could be wrong, but I think next cycle they defend more seats than Republicans. They might cut the Republican's margin in the Senate, -maybe- but no way they regain the House. Senate unlikely.

Dems badly conflated Obama's personal electability with his policies. They were led out to the wilderness and have shown no interest in heading back to civilization. Probably wounded pride, but there are calls to go harder left. That will only work in the very safe districts that they already have where any approach with a d after the name will work.
 
"Dems badly conflated Obama's personal electability with his policies. They were led out to the wilderness and have shown no interest in heading back to civilization. Probably wounded pride, but there are calls to go harder left. That will only work in the very safe districts that they already have where any approach with a d after the name will work."


:cool:
 
KingOrfeo said:
A largely routine military exercise.
Click to expand...

Is there ANY behavior by ANY democrat you will not blithly excuse?

It was deliberately provacative act. The kind of thing that could actually start a war if it wasn't for the fact that no one believes Obama is actually capable of aggression.

At least have the intestinal fortitude to stand up for your man when you're defending him and do so without having to be disingenuous. Admit it was a provocative act and come up with some excuse for why it was justified but to pretend that it was a routine military exercise is just weak.
 
Conager said:
Is there ANY behavior by ANY democrat you will not blithly excuse?
Admit it was a provocative act and come up with some excuse for why it was justified but to pretend that it was a routine military exercise is just weak.

It was deliberately provacative act. The kind of thing that could actually start a war if it wasn't for the fact that no one believes Obama is actually capable of aggression.
Click to expand...

Indeed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
British Billionaire Forced To Stop Funding Radical Leftist Programs In The US
Replies
5
Views
162
wallstreetguy
W
P
General Milley wants more U.S. troops in Eastern Europe
Replies
15
Views
789
pecksniff
P
P
U.S. looks at supporting anti-Russian insurgency in Ukraine
4 5 6
Replies
149
Views
6K
pecksniff
P
B
All That America Lost During Trump's War On Reality
2
Replies
34
Views
1K
Philthy_Phil
Philthy_Phil
KeithD
More on Trump as Russian Asset
Replies
0
Views
298
KeithD
KeithD
Back
Top