Poll: If You Could Punch a Republican

[Hard_Rom]

Bannon and few more.

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it. Martin Luther King, Jr.

 

[ChloeTzang]

Yep, Adrina is right.

She is? I thought she was left? OMG I'm so confused. LOL. I better go back and read a few Breitbart articles again to make sure my ideology is pure and aligned correctly with the stars before I say anything further.

 

[ChloeTzang]

He uses physical bullying tactics involving pain (a handshake used as a battle weapon) and pushing people.

Oh dear. Crushed hands? Shame on him. Still, I guess that's worse, far far worse, than Killary's body count.

 

[lovecraft68]

Could I line them all up, so I could get them all in one swing?

One long three stooges slap

 

[lovecraft68]

I figured there wouldn't be any guys taking a swing at Betsy, so I stepped up

We appreciate your team spirit.

 

[lovecraft68]

The right claims the left is whiny liberals and snowflakes, but here they're "Oh, the violence" showing who of the two sides are the whiny little cry babies.

The right doesn't preach violence, they preach total control. White, straight male and Christian come aboard, everyone else? We'll force you away....but libs preach hate.

Let's see how many of the people in the list attack women either physically or politically to take away their rights.

I've engaged in several heated political discussions in bars lately and in each instance it was the 'right' side that started escalating things into "Yeah, well I'll..."

And in each instance when my reply was a simple "Okay, go ahead" guess what happened then? Yeah, nothing. Big talk on the net. Haters when in groups and behind a keyboard.

Pussies in real life.

 

[lovecraft68]

This is funny. Here the left is complaining about some jerk who forced himself into the face of a candidate for office just like another one of his so called Joseph Goebbels buddies already did and the candidate protected himself and now you are filled with the desire to hit people and cause violence. Like the so called marchers who wreck cities in the name of "protesting". It's OK for leftist thugs to throw fire bombs, attack people, blow up little girls, and put up a post like this, but don't anyone kick their ass for being a commie or nazi. You might hurt their feelings. If I was going to hit any traitor or corrupt politician it would be Hillary or Obama or any dozen fake liars and crooks of the left, but that would be wrong and against the law. But the left doesn't believe in the law that is why they back Soros black shirts, street gangs and drug dealers and terrorist. The only thing that happened when the man pushed that attacker away was it got him more votes. See the American people are sick of the left and will back anyone who stands up to the cowards and thugs.

Translation.... wahhhhh.

 

[ishtat]

It'd be easier to pick the pollies who one wouldn't want to thump. Mebbe that Senator from Maine - Susan Collins, she borders on the rational fairly often.

Then there's the Democrats. I would volunteer to swipe and clear out the geriatric failures, Clinton, Pelosi, Sanders, Warren. They desperately need new people up front. Could a new blue doggish kinda guy be possible?

 

[handysr]

There's two examples of actual violence in this thread:

--Greg Gianforte body slamming a reporter

--A right wing Islamophobe psycho murdering two good Samaritans trying to stop him from harassing women on a train

The right, not the left, owns political violence. You know, the real kind, where people go to the hospital and/or die

To be fair, in the USA there have been a few instances of murder by supporters of each side. I'm not trying to get a body count, it's reprehensible either way. But the rioting, assaults, and hate is mostly coming from the left. The number of legit violent Trump supporters (not paid (D) rioters) are dwarfed by the liberal crowd. Badly.

The right claims the left is whiny liberals and snowflakes, but here they're "Oh, the violence" showing who of the two sides are the whiny little cry babies.

The right doesn't preach violence, they preach total control. White, straight male and Christian come aboard, everyone else? We'll force you away....but libs preach hate.

Let's see how many of the people in the list attack women either physically or politically to take away their rights.

I've engaged in several heated political discussions in bars lately and in each instance it was the 'right' side that started escalating things into "Yeah, well I'll..."

And in each instance when my reply was a simple "Okay, go ahead" guess what happened then? Yeah, nothing. Big talk on the net. Haters when in groups and behind a keyboard.

Pussies in real life.

OMG, I'm so scared now. I'm trembling in fear. <yawn>
No I won't challenge you to a fight, online or IRL, it's not worth the hassle. But golly gee willakers gramps, I'm so proud of you for 'almost' getting in a bar brawl over something so stupid as politics. You must be proud.

Yeah, you're preaching hate. I see it in almost every single one of your posts. Gratuitous hate, violence, and murder of those who don't agree with you. I don't go that way, not total control like you say, but I will admit to having and voicing strong opinions against those that want to steal from me (socialists) or those that want to harm my country (islamic terrorists), even when the targets are groups of people I can't personally stand.

ETA: yeah I already got a screenshot (like that matters lol) of your kind and loving manner towards those you don't like.
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1400525

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Oh dear god, that's so true. I hate to sound age-ist, but for f's sake, Dianne Feinstein won't leave the Senate until she's in a pine box, and she'll still be yapping.

\

Then there's the Democrats. I would volunteer to swipe and clear out the geriatric failures, Clinton, Pelosi, Sanders, Warren. They desperately need new people up front. Could a new blue doggish kinda guy be possible?

 

[Chris_Michael]

Wait a second. You liberals always preach that free speech doesn't come without consequences. The consequences of the reporter's free speech was to get body slammed.

This is what you want. You want to be able to physically attack somebody based on your inability to handle their opinions and what they express.

I'm surprised you're not voting Republican now!

That being said, if this were the opposite way around and a Democrat body slammed some right wing reporter, you would say he deserved it. How strange, you primitive animals are.

 

[ChloeTzang]

Oh dear god, that's so true. I hate to sound age-ist, but for f's sake, Dianne Feinstein won't leave the Senate until she's in a pine box, and she'll still be yapping.

A stake thru the heart should manage it. You hammer, I'll hold the stake. Lol.

 

[handysr]

Oh dear god, that's so true. I hate to sound age-ist, but for f's sake, Dianne Feinstein won't leave the Senate until she's in a pine box, and she'll still be yapping.

A stake thru the heart should manage it. You hammer, I'll hold the stake. Lol.

Oh please let me take pictures of that. It might not be enough, so into the fires of Mordor that box goes, followed by a salvo of nuclear bombs, then I'll throw garlic onto the rubble.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

No, the Judicial Branch puts limits and consequences to Free Speech. There are plenty of ways to break the law with your speech, but a reporter asking a question is NOT one of them, which is why Gianforte got charged with assault.

It's truly bizarre that "you people" are so disoriented and upside down.

Gianforte--a Republican--body slammed and punched a reporter. You apparently can't deal with that simple fact. You must find a way to prattle on as if this a question of liberal violence.

And while we're at it, the only person in trouble for their "speech" in this regard is Donald Trump, who has a lawsuit pending against him for inciting violence at his rallies.

Trump
Gianforte
The right wing freak who killed two guys because they tried to protect some girls he was verbally assaulting.

All the violence here is coming from the right. Look in the mirror. You've got a big problem.

Wait a second. You liberals always preach that free speech doesn't come without consequences. The consequences of the reporter's free speech was to get body slammed.

This is what you want. You want to be able to physically attack somebody based on your inability to handle their opinions and what they express.

I'm surprised you're not voting Republican now!

That being said, if this were the opposite way around and a Democrat body slammed some right wing reporter, you would say he deserved it. How strange, you primitive animals are.

 

[handysr]

And while we're at it, the only person in trouble for their "speech" in this regard is Donald Trump, who has a lawsuit pending against him for inciting violence at his rallies.

Trump
Gianforte
The right wing freak who killed two guys because they tried to protect some girls he was verbally assaulting.

All the violence here is coming from the right. Look in the mirror. You've got a big problem.

So Trump has a lawsuit for inciting violence with words? Why aren't 75% of liberal college students in trouble for the same thing? They're the worst offenders I've seen in years!

Look in the mirror? No, I don't want to, I'm an ugly bastard. How about if you don't take much effort and look through the GB and Politics threads here. You'll see some conservative and right-wing verbal violence, but you will probably miss it due to the overwhelming hate from the liberal camp. Even for "internet bullies" this kind of textual assault is crazy.


ETA: I could link to Breitbart, but most here wouldn't click. How about CNN's angle on it? This liberal riot sadly isn't the first or last, this is happening on almost a weekly basis. Granted, most times there is much less damage and explosions, but it's still violent and innappropriate.

 

[Boxlicker101]

No, the Judicial Branch puts limits and consequences to Free Speech. There are plenty of ways to break the law with your speech, but a reporter asking a question is NOT one of them, which is why Gianforte got charged with assault.

It's truly bizarre that "you people" are so disoriented and upside down.

Gianforte--a Republican--body slammed and punched a reporter. You apparently can't deal with that simple fact. You must find a way to prattle on as if this a question of liberal violence.

And while we're at it, the only person in trouble for their "speech" in this regard is Donald Trump, who has a lawsuit pending against him for inciting violence at his rallies.

Trump
Gianforte
The right wing freak who killed two guys because they tried to protect some girls he was verbally assaulting.

All the violence here is coming from the right. Look in the mirror. You've got a big problem.

It depends on how the question is asked. If a reporter or somebody else enters your space without any kind of permission and starts badgering, you and refuses to leave, there is some justification for expelling him violently. That is what happened here. As for that charge, let's see how it comes out.

And, I would like to point out this thread is based on Liberal violence.

 

[Sweetsweatymango]

The only politician who deserves a good knock out is a damn democrat.

 

[adrina]

It depends on how the question is asked. If a reporter or somebody else enters your space without any kind of permission and starts badgering, you and refuses to leave, there is some justification for expelling him violently. That is what happened here. As for that charge, let's see how it comes out.

And, I would like to point out this thread is based on Liberal violence.

No actually. If someone doesn't lay a hand on you, you do not have a right to assault them, let alone cause property damage.

Is this how you about your daily life - assaulting aggressive poll takers etc?

The lengths to which people go to justify this behavior stymies me. The only appropriate physical response for someone putting a microphone in your face that you did not want is to push their hand away. You do not body slam them and you do not damage their property.

Unless you are approximately 5 years old and haven't learned better emotional self control. And most certainly not a grown adult. I look at this and see yet another man that can't seem to figure out that might does not make right.

Spare me.

 

[Chris_Michael]

It depends on how the question is asked. If a reporter or somebody else enters your space without any kind of permission and starts badgering, you and refuses to leave, there is some justification for expelling him violently. That is what happened here. As for that charge, let's see how it comes out.

And, I would like to point out this thread is based on Liberal violence.

Violence is ONLY okay if you're an offended leftist. Otherwise, it's oppression and criminal in behavior.

If you don't agree with them, you don't have free speech. You have free speech with consequences.

 

[Chris_Michael]

No actually. If someone doesn't lay a hand on you, you do not have a right to assault them, let alone cause property damage.

Is this how you about your daily life - assaulting aggressive poll takers etc?

The lengths to which people go to justify this behavior stymies me. The only appropriate physical response for someone putting a microphone in your face that you did not want is to push their hand away. You do not body slam them and you do not damage their property.

Unless you are approximately 5 years old and haven't learned better emotional self control. And most certainly not a grown adult. I look at this and see yet another man that can't seem to figure out that might does not make right.

Spare me.

Well, you have to remember about men... They do the hard jobs, the dangerous jobs, the jobs women don't want. It's also a fact that men are both either incredibly dumb or geniuses. So, you have men winning nobel prizes and men in prisons. Women fall in the middle and don't generally invest their lives in business, inventing new things, and doing high-risk jobs.

So, when women step up their construction game, their sewer system game, etc., then perhaps we can discuss the other aspects of men's aggressive behavior.

Factual Feminist - Christina Hoff Sommers - Are Men Obselete?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CME-aeQXj9s&list=PLytTJqkSQqtr7BqC1Jf4nv3g2yDfu7Xmd&index=18

 

[adrina]

Well, you have to remember about men... They do the hard jobs, the dangerous jobs, the jobs women don't want. It's also a fact that men are both either incredibly dumb or geniuses. So, you have men winning nobel prizes and men in prisons. Women fall in the middle and don't generally invest their lives in business, inventing new things, and doing high-risk jobs.

So, when women step up their construction game, their sewer system game, etc., then perhaps we can discuss the other aspects of men's aggressive behavior.

Factual Feminist - Christina Hoff Sommers - Are Men Obselete?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CME-aeQXj9s&list=PLytTJqkSQqtr7BqC1Jf4nv3g2yDfu7Xmd&index=18

Oh you poor baby. How did culture or society ever survive or thrive while you men did all the work and we silly inept useless women sat on our lazy butts and held you all back because you have to carry us.

It's truly a miracle. You should feel very proud of yourselves.

I would thank you but I'm too busy marveling at all that women haven't accomplished.

 

[Slave4daddy]

I would vote if John McCain was an option.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

You can get a write-in ballot

Which reminds me, I made a grave error. Sarah Palin should be on that list.

I would vote if John McCain was an option.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Liberal violence reminds me, did I only say one punch?

That should be changed to one punch per hypocritical lie, and a body slam for each person being kicked off healthcare to give tax cuts to the rich. Oh no!

Typical idiotic response from Box.

Let's clear up the bullshit.

1. Ben Jacobs did not trespass into a private room. It was a press room where the press was gathered. He had every right to be there.

2. He was never "asked to leave," so couldn't have "refused" to leave.

3. He asked him one question, and half of a follow up question, then he was body slammed with no warning or demand to get out of his face or anything. Just an out of the blue attack. A whiney little snowflake like Gianforte might consider 1 1/2 questions about health care, asked in a quiet voice, as "badgering," but you can listen to the audio and see for yourself.

Here is the account of what happened from Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna:

The race to fill Montana's sole seat in the U.S. House of Representatives took a violent turn Wednesday, and a crew from the Fox News Channel, including myself, witnessed it firsthand.

As part of our preparation for a story about Thursday's special election to air on "Special Report with Bret Baier," we arranged interviews with the top two candidates, Republican Greg Gianforte and Democrat Rob Quist. On Wednesday, I joined field producer Faith Mangan and photographer Keith Railey in Bozeman for our scheduled interview with Gianforte, which was to take place at the Gianforte for Congress Bozeman Headquarters.

Faith, Keith and I arrived early to set up for the interview in a room adjacent to another room where a volunteer BBQ was to take place. As the time for the interview neared, Gianforte came into the room. We exchanged pleasantries and made small talk about restaurants and Bozeman.

During that conversation, another man — who we now know is Ben Jacobs of The Guardian — walked into the room with a voice recorder, put it up to Gianforte's face and began asking if he had a response to the newly released Congressional Budget Office report on the American Health Care Act. Gianforte told him he would get to him later. Jacobs persisted with his question. Gianforte told him to talk to his press guy, Shane Scanlon

At that point, Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck with both hands and slammed him into the ground behind him. Faith, Keith and I watched in disbelief as Gianforte then began punching the reporter. As Gianforte moved on top of Jacobs, he began yelling something to the effect of, "I'm sick and tired of this!"

Jacobs scrambled to his knees and said something about his glasses being broken. He asked Faith, Keith and myself for our names. In shock, we did not answer. Jacobs then said he wanted the police called and went to leave. Gianforte looked at the three of us and repeatedly apologized. At that point, I told him and Scanlon, who was now present, that we needed a moment. The men then left.

To be clear, at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, who left the area after giving statements to local sheriff's deputies.*

As for myself and my crew, we are cooperating with local authorities. Gianforte was given a citation for misdemeanor assault and will have to appear in court sometime before June 7.

Now, Faux News quickly went on the attack against its own reporters, with Laura Ingraham badgering and grilling Alicia Acuna until she supposedly "changed" her story, and Fox then quickly tried to discredit their own reporter's account with glaring headlines of "Acuna Backs Off First Hand Account."

Here is what "changed."

However, on 'The Laura Ingraham Show' on Wednesday, she appeared to change her initial story, walking back claims that Gianforte grabbed Jacobs' neck

"You know, and I'm the one who said that," Acuna told Laura Ingraham about the neck grab claim. "I saw both his hands go up, not around his neck in a strangling type of way, but more just on each side of his neck, just grabbed him and I guess it could've been on his clothes, I don't know."

"Again, just to clarify, he didn't grab him by the neck with both hands in the way that was initially described, that's not quite accurate?" Ingraham asked at the end of the interview.

"​No, so it wasn't like he grabbed him around the neck, he had one hand on each side of his neck," Acuna confirmed

.

It depends on how the question is asked. If a reporter or somebody else enters your space without any kind of permission and starts badgering, you and refuses to leave, there is some justification for expelling him violently. That is what happened here. As for that charge, let's see how it comes out.

And, I would like to point out this thread is based on Liberal violence.

 

[Chris_Michael]

Oh you poor baby. How did culture or society ever survive or thrive while you men did all the work and we silly inept useless women sat on our lazy butts and held you all back because you have to carry us.

It's truly a miracle. You should feel very proud of yourselves.

I would thank you but I'm too busy marveling at all that women haven't accomplished.

Personally, I don't have the issues other men face. I don't have a dangerous or dirty job, I'm not in the military, and I don't have to work in extreme heat. So, really... you should aim your patronizing attitude towards the men who actually do that work and die for you to shit talk them. I didn't know you had such a hateful, bigot, sexist view of men. Be careful because if you express those views to men who believe in freedom of speech with consequences, you're going to get beat unconscious and regret what you said.

As fun as it would be to see that, I prefer my speech 100% free and nobody to get violently attacked. Too bad you don't feel the same.