Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
trackguy said:thanks for stopping by my thread again hun........will you be graceing me with a pic there??![]()
TaraTainton said:Tell me the trick to posting up my own avatar and I'll share a pic.
The rumor has it you can after 100 posts...but I still don't see the option in my User CP.
I think I'm gonna cry...
TaraTainton said:Inruderrider, you're always so thoughtful! I'm so flattered. Thanks for visiting my thread regularly.![]()

trackguy said:it's under setting & options about the 5th option down
like there is edit signature...........and some others
Because good sense has zero influence when it comes to religious reactionary knee-jerk responses.Fflow said:Drug use and abuse is always an interesting, if not contentious, topic. There was recently a rather compelling report on NPR about an ex-under-cover narcotics cop who, after something like 15 years, was so disgusted with the duplicity and failure, that he quit his gig. He was saying that the war on drugs is a complete and utter failure. Despite all the effort spent on 'catching the bad guys,' (the dealers, distributors, and manufactures) no serious effort has been made to reduce demand.
I live in California, and Mexican pot is available just as it always has been. Homeland security has, in no way shape or form stemmed the tide. I don't see crack heads and coke snorters taking to the streets in search of supplies. Interdiction has always failed and will continue to fail as long as people want the drugs.
So, if interdiction fails, then what? Education? Sure, we can start at a very early age, teaching kids about the perils of drugs. I know that it prevented me from using them for a good long time. Until High School, at least. Are scare tactics what we want to equip our children with? Are those the most effective tools for them to use? I don't think so. I think that kids need a more profound education, one that helps them to understand both the limitations and capabilities of their minds and bodies. I believe that deep relaxation techniques, self-hypnosis, positive aphorisms, etc could be taught to really young kids. (I learned self-hypnosis when I was 6 or 7, from my dad) When kids understand the real power of their minds, they can release it for fun and/or prophet without the use of drugs.
Education does not simply replace interdiction. Full legalization, to me, seems like the only civilized path. Some people risk their lives, and the lives of their loved ones, for a fix. For want of a clean needle, people become infected and die every day. A huge majority of crime in the US is drug related. If we removed all the financial incentives for criminals, they'd all have to get jobs sweeping up.
I'm not the first to expound on these ideas. They've been around for years. My question is: Why, then, if these ideas clearly make sense (and they do) have they not been implemented?
xoxo
srw
TaraTainton said:I do appreciate your specific directions! Unfortunately, it's a little more complicated than that. Just as when I first signed up....in the Edit Avatar area, there's only ONE radio button to choose from, which is seemingly permanently selected. "No avatar selected" or some such. There's no other option to choose, no way to deselect that damn button.
How do you get ahold of a moderator or IT guru around here?
raphy said:Because good sense has zero influence when it comes to religious reactionary knee-jerk responses.
"Drugs are bad for you, therefore we must make them illegal."
They're treating the symptoms, not the cause.
trackguy said:i see you got it!!!!
great av, does that mean i get my pick now?![]()
![]()


SBroadB9 said:Hi, Tara
Just found your thread, and went through all 15 pages. You are a considerable hottie.![]()

TaraTainton said:I always keep my promises.Do you have a special interest? I'll see if I happen to have something similar in my collection.
![]()
trackguy said:i'm a bum man! and i adore yours!!!!

trackguy said:but your breasts are pretty damn amazing as well![]()
TaraTainton said:Okay...I'm headed over to contribute something very special to your thread....
You may also be interested to know that I contributed to the General Boards thread regarding nipples earlier today....

TaraTainton said:Australia....well, depending on what timezone you're in, you're probably about 16 hours AHEAD of my day.
How about an avatar showing your favorite rude gesture? Or one large eyeball? That'll get everyone laughing and recognizing your posts right away.
You know, I'd love to agree that we should all have as much privacy as possible, yet it's also our govt's responsibility to protect us and how else can they if not permitted to look right in the bag? Is there another way to ensure certain items aren't carried where they can do harm to masses of people? Longer lines to get on the train...everyone can adjust to that just like rush hour traffic in your cars. And as far as carrying around your other illegal items you DON'T intend to hurt others with, you'll just have to get more creative. I guess my opinion is that public safety should come before one of the facets of our privacy, but I'll be all ears if someone has another solution for ensuring what happened in London can't happen again. As it is, I've gotten over my sense of privacy and shyness when it comes to airports, knowing the weird looking dude checking bags is ALWAYS going to select me, empty the contents of everything I'm carrying for all to see, and make me practically do a little dance before him to check my self. Whatever gets his rocks off; can't let it bug me.
Well, I knew I could dig up a pic of the eyes for you, glad you found one to satisfy you much sooner.Yes, my site's all my doing...I'm more than a bit of a tech-head.
I do a little web design for GOOD now rather than evil as I like to refer my stint in the corporate world behind a desk.
GOOD MORNING, ALL!