Why should I defend them? He is perfectly entitled to say whatever he pleases. What puzzles me is your apparent inability to explain, beyond mere assertion, how those opinions somehow erase a lifetime of distinguished legal scholarship, judicial reasoning, and constitutional analysis. Condemnation is easy; refutation requires intellect. Thus far, you've supplied only the former.
Post his last four tweets and defend them
Like during the 2020 election cycle? All these fraud cases brought before the courts, most cases denied for standing. Not one suit brought before the court was granted evidentiary hearings. Democrats think they won. It all coming out today.
You post them. I don't care what he might have said.
Sen Lee is a troll. He does not deserve to be the head of any committee .
We have been right all along.
Your mind has become so thoroughly captive to hateful certainty that evidence no longer has standing in your Kangaroo court. It may knock, announce itself, and present impeccable credentials, but to see the verdict has already been rendered.
I read his shit every single day.
74 doesn't believe Lee should chair the senate judiciary. You could suggest any republican senator and 74's opinion would be the same.
unserious. Full stop.
The Turtle is said to have many friends in the CCP.
Quote a tweet of his and defend it.
The refuge of those who confuse dismissal with a refutation. It's astonishing how often your certainty arrives unaccompanied by evidence.
His Dragon Lady concubine was wired into the moguls in China, who were kept on a very tight leash by the Chinese government. Trump may have had his big payday last year, but I have to think that the offshore bank accounts of McConnell and his wife likely contain hundreds of millions of dollars.
Your histrionics forfeited the right to serious discussion years ago.
The only 'histrionics' here are you fabricating a flat-out lie against the completely wrong person. If you're going to launch an attack, put your fiction aside and produce actual evidence. Your entire narrative rests on assertion rather than fact, and you have yet to engage with the substance of the issues I've raised. Instead of refuting the evidence, you manufacture a fiction and hope it will distract from the absence of both argument and intellect.
He never said it was a pure democracy.
Democrats cannot differentiate between a democracy and a republic. One can lead to majority tyranny and the other is based on the protection of individual rights. Example, Biden democrats owned the WH, the house and the senate. They opened up our borders, violated immigration laws and conservative republicans were powerless to do anything about it. Border control didn’t require a vote, just an uncontested majority to break our laws and not hold anyone accountable. If Democrats ever hold the majorities along with the WH this republic will seize to exist. They will eliminate the filibuster rule, eliminate the electoral college, make DC and PR states, pack the court, eliminate prisons, defund police, abolish ICE and basically shitcan the constitution along with the senate and the executive branch. Just ask the DSA. 10 years ago this was pie in the sky bullshit but today, not so much. Moderate Democrats are cowards, they are literally surrendering their party to communists.
A little off topic but relevant to today’s economic crossroad. This, in my opinion, says a lot about today’s economic outlook and how Trump’s policies are attempting to bring back manufacturing. Worth watching in my opinion.
NO evidence to support that.
