Romance vs. Raunch

[MT_Pitcher]

me to...I was more dreaming than speaking from experience

They exist, and so do the women...
Few and far between.......
Sometimes it just takes a long time to find them.

But one person's raunch can be another's romance...
I think it lies more in the intent and the compatiblity of personalities..

 

[yesYesYEsYES]

They exist, and so do the women...
Few and far between.......
Sometimes it just takes a long time to find them.

But one person's raunch can be another's romance...
I think it lies more in the intent and the compatiblity of personalities..

yep...your exactly right...and I know I will fing it one day

 

[MT_Pitcher]

yep...your exactly right...and I know I will fing it one day

Oh.... I know you will....
You've got a lot to offer, lady.....

 

[babydoll2u]

Good thread, the first time I've seen it....I think romance and raunch mixed together is such a turn on....there is nothing like a man handing you a rose and whispering in your ear at the same time EXACTLY what he plans on doing to you later...and I believe that a woman can be romantic and raunchy at the same time and do it with class also...

now THAT is my kinda man!
and ditto for the woman

 

[bashfull]

From earlier in the thread....

Gentleman demeanor but "cowboy" on the inside. Adds extra flavor if you share this knowledge with your "lady". Both are courtly and secretly thinking and "naughty" thoughts. Example: Attend a black tie affair. I am the guest speaker and wearing a tuxedo. My lady is gorgeous in a black gown that that leaves the imagination naked but the skin clothed. There is a long slit running up her lucious leg. Just a few minutes before I must stand and speak, she leans over and whispers "I am not wearing underwear". She then continues her conversation with the other guests. Granted, this is more of an example of the "a lady in public and a whore in the bedroom" scenario, but is what I long for in life.

 

[yesYesYEsYES]

Re: From earlier in the thread....

Gentleman demeanor but "cowboy" on the inside. Adds extra flavor if you share this knowledge with your "lady". Both are courtly and secretly thinking and "naughty" thoughts. Example: Attend a black tie affair. I am the guest speaker and wearing a tuxedo. My lady is gorgeous in a black gown that that leaves the imagination naked but the skin clothed. There is a long slit running up her lucious leg. Just a few minutes before I must stand and speak, she leans over and whispers "I am not wearing underwear". She then continues her conversation with the other guests. Granted, this is more of an example of the "a lady in public and a whore in the bedroom" scenario, but is what I long for in life.

and that is exactly what I meant by one can do it with class ... and damn where were you when I lived in Texas??????

 

[bashfull]

Re: Re: From earlier in the thread....

and that is exactly what I meant by one can do it with class ... and damn where were you when I lived in Texas??????

Probably where i am now...the East Coast, darlin'.



Bash

 

[mayi]

sneaking up behind bash and placing a kiss on his neck.......

hey there sexy, how have you been?

 

[bashfull]

sneaking up behind bash and placing a kiss on his neck.......

hey there sexy, how have you been?

Well, I'll be...talk bout a blas from the past! How are ya, hon?

<<hugs>>>



Bash

 

[bashfull]

Question:

Can one be romantically linked...and sustain that link when one side shares not? By this I mean trust. Can one person completely reveal themselves to another over a period of time to prove trust and but continue to receive naught? To reveal one's secrets, most cherished, but still continue to be told that one is not trusted by the other? Can this last? Is it romance? The other party saying that there is love but how can there be love without trust?

 

[bashfull]

Re: Re: Re: Romance vs. Raunch

Here you can be anything you want to be
if you are female and wish to be both a gentleman and a bad boy, more power to you

Meant to address this before. You are correct that here one can be anything...or anyone. That is, perhaps, one of my greatest concerns here. I fear that those whom I get to know aren't really the person I think they are. I prefer someone to be honest and be themselves. I see this forum as a potential for someone to release their restraints, shed their masks, and revel in who they are...and want to be. I fear that someone will tell me what I want to hear rather than realize that I only want to know the truth.

 

[beingbrave]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Romance vs. Raunch

Meant to address this before. You are correct that here one can be anything...or anyone. That is, perhaps, one of my greatest concerns here. I fear that those whom I get to know aren't really the person I think they are. I prefer someone to be honest and be themselves. I see this forum as a potential for someone to release their restraints, shed their masks, and revel in who they are...and want to be. I fear that someone will tell me what I want to hear rather than realize that I only want to know the truth.

I am honest and am always myself but I have met those who are not. I would rather know the truth as well, but on lit as in real life some people have a hard time with the truth.

 

[MT_Pitcher]

Question:

Can one be romantically linked...and sustain that link when one side shares not? By this I mean trust. Can one person completely reveal themselves to another over a period of time to prove trust and but continue to receive naught? To reveal one's secrets, most cherished, but still continue to be told that one is not trusted by the other? Can this last? Is it romance? The other party saying that there is love but how can there be love without trust?

Answer:
Real love requires real trust...
You can lust for them, you can love parts of them..
But the big stuff needs trust or you're living a lie!

 

[babydoll2u]

Answer:
Real love requires real trust...
You can lust for them, you can love parts of them..
But the big stuff needs trust or you're living a lie!

absolutely true

 

[babydoll2u]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Romance vs. Raunch

Meant to address this before. You are correct that here one can be anything...or anyone. That is, perhaps, one of my greatest concerns here. I fear that those whom I get to know aren't really the person I think they are. I prefer someone to be honest and be themselves. I see this forum as a potential for someone to release their restraints, shed their masks, and revel in who they are...and want to be. I fear that someone will tell me what I want to hear rather than realize that I only want to know the truth.

yeah, that's one of my greatest fears as well.

 

[babydoll2u]

Re: Re: Re: From earlier in the thread....

Probably where i am now...the East Coast, darlin'.



Bash

<perk> where on the east coast??

 

[bashfull]

Re: From earlier in the thread....

<perk> where on the east coast??

Why, I'm in the state for lovers, darlin. Viginia is for lovers. Honest, that's the states slogan.

 

[babydoll2u]

Re: Re: From earlier in the thread....

Why, I'm in the state for lovers, darlin. Viginia is for lovers. Honest, that's the states slogan.

nice

 

[beingbrave]

Question:

Can one be romantically linked...and sustain that link when one side shares not? By this I mean trust. Can one person completely reveal themselves to another over a period of time to prove trust and but continue to receive naught? To reveal one's secrets, most cherished, but still continue to be told that one is not trusted by the other? Can this last? Is it romance? The other party saying that there is love but how can there be love without trust?

Yes, one can sustain the link if the revealer doesn't feel bad about sharing, and the sharee does not feel bad about not sharing. Why did the revealer need to prove their trust? That is the sticking point for me, why was this necessary?

What made the revealer want to share? Was there an understanding that it was an exchange rather than a gift?

I am not sure this can last because the revealer feels an inequality, a vulnerability, an injury that the sharee did not share back. People love in many ways and have different timelines on trust, I think the revealer needs to be patient and see what happens over time.

 

[Honey123]

Romance vs. Raunch....

I wanted to bump this thread because I needed to know how men feel about women who might be considered Raunchy, but in a naughty, playful way?

I think we all want that romance that makes us feel incredible, sexy....but then we have that animalistic need that makes us blurt out our most naughtist desires...

I have no qualms about telling a man what I want, how I want it and where I want it done. Is that a good thing?

 

[MrFantasyMan]

Romance vs. Raunch....

I wanted to bump this thread because I needed to know how men feel about women who might be considered Raunchy, but in a naughty, playful way?

I think we all want that romance that makes us feel incredible, sexy....but then we have that animalistic need that makes us blurt out our most naughtist desires...

I have no qualms about telling a man what I want, how I want it and where I want it done. Is that a good thing?

I certainly think so... ...speak your mind and IMHO they can both go together quite well...

 

[bashfull]

Romance vs. Raunch....

I wanted to bump this thread because I needed to know how men feel about women who might be considered Raunchy, but in a naughty, playful way?

I think we all want that romance that makes us feel incredible, sexy....but then we have that animalistic need that makes us blurt out our most naughtist desires...

I have no qualms about telling a man what I want, how I want it and where I want it done. Is that a good thing?

Wow...this thread is a blast from the past....

Honey, that is a very good thing, my dear! <<listens carefully>>> Wanna tell me what you want?



Bash

 

[Honey123]

Wow...this thread is a blast from the past....

Honey, that is a very good thing, my dear! <<listens carefully>>> Wanna tell me what you want?



Bash

If I did tell you....would you hold it against me?

 

[Honey123]

I certainly think so... ...speak your mind and IMHO they can both go together quite well...

Whew....I didn't want to think be naughty and sexy was a bad thing.

 

[irishrule05]

Romance vs. Raunch....

I wanted to bump this thread because I needed to know how men feel about women who might be considered Raunchy, but in a naughty, playful way?

I think we all want that romance that makes us feel incredible, sexy....but then we have that animalistic need that makes us blurt out our most naughtist desires...

I have no qualms about telling a man what I want, how I want it and where I want it done. Is that a good thing?

Honey, I think that is a very good thing.