Sissies! What Type of Sissy are You?

[drobert44]

I LOVE the Dita lingerie retro style, especially the deep garter belts with six garters.

Couldnt hardly find a garter belt in NYC!!!

 

[RachelWalsh]

Are you a straight sissy? A gay “faggot” sissy? Something in between? Something else?

There's an intriguing posting on Reddit where a phone-sex professional—a qualified observer of the 'sissy' attitudes in fantasy and r/l dynamics—draws on his experience interacting with the variety of beta males, closeted bi and gay men, etc. who are attracted to the sissy lifestyle, and he offers some unique insights, at some length.

He divides sissies into four categories, based on their mix of gender identity and sexual orientation. And it is fascinating, in his concept, what differences and similarities there are between these distinct types of sissy. Of course, many have pointed out before that lots of cross dressers are actually straight men. Some say most of us are. But according to the “Sissy Master” and his breakdown of 4 sissy types, there's more to it than that. Much more.

Here's what he came up with:

1. The Gay / Effeminate Sissy
2. The Bisexual Sissy
3. The Transgender, Gender Fluid Sissy
4. The Straight Sissy

In his lengthy post, the author elaborates at length on each. It's an interesting take, and well worth reading. I can post more about it, we can discuss each, or all of these types, if there's interest. Is 4 types enough? In some cases it seems like the “sissy” identity is a transitional state, or even a role of convenience. A way to rationalize certain tendencies and urges. Also in the age of the internet, I think it's possible that the word itself, “sissy”, has broadened in it's meaning, compared to what it might have meant some decades ago.

I think I am more like a straight female with ni tendencies. I will kiss a girl sometimes for example

 

[drobert44]

I think I am more like a straight female with ni tendencies. I will kiss a girl sometimes for example

I have met a few, online, that are almost radical feminists, wont date men, etc. Not for me!

 

[jboggy]

hi

I think sissy is a male born with a female mind, and continues with the natural organs while secretly wears female attire and engages in sex acts willingly in female role, with oral and anal submission to a dominant male interested and inclined to use and satisfy the SISSY.

Count me in. I dress up regularly, go out sometimes, love anal. Transitioning mtf.

Update: new photo of me after 10 years of transition:
View attachment 2267868View attachment 2267869View attachment 2267870

 

[drobert44]

Count me in. I dress up regularly, go out sometimes, love anal. Transitioning mtf.

My Tgirl dressed me for cock....

https://imgur.com/Hs39pAD

 

[drobert44]

My Tgirl dressed me for cock....

https://imgur.com/Hs39pAD

Sho nuff, she turned me gay, LOL

https://imgur.com/GNpDkY4

 

[jboggy]

That’s awesome. I also get lucky from time to time.

 

[drobert44]

That’s awesome. I also get lucky from time to time.

Gorgeous! Nice sissycock, I am the kind of Daddy who would suck you.....

https://imgur.com/kcJKPxS

My first sissy, 8 yrs ago, more lipstick after sucking my dick.

 

[jboggy]

Love lipstick

 

[Escierto]

Love lipstick

You are very attractive. Are you trans?

 

[jboggy]

Yes

 

[drobert44]

You are very attractive. Are you trans?

I dated a T girl who went to Canada for a penictomy. $25K.........

 

[Escierto]

Yes

Well, you are a beautiful woman.

 

[jboggy]

Thank you

 

[Escierto]

I dated a T girl who went to Canada for a penictomy. $25K.........

I guess it was worth it to her. My girlfriend’s breast implants were $4000 in the Philippines which is a lot of money there. She would never have her beautiful penis removed but I would love her even if she did.
View attachment 2140714

 

[Dino1960]

Love lipstick

@jboggy you do look amazing and beautiful as a tgurl. I would love to enjoy an evening with you starting with drinks and a meal before heading back to my hotel room. X

 

[el_uno77]

That’s awesome. I also get lucky from time to time.

i love that smile....you are very beautiful....

 

[muycurioso]

Are you a straight sissy? A gay “faggot” sissy? Something in between? Something else?

There's an intriguing posting on Reddit where a phone-sex professional—a qualified observer of the 'sissy' attitudes in fantasy and r/l dynamics—draws on his experience interacting with the variety of beta males, closeted bi and gay men, etc. who are attracted to the sissy lifestyle, and he offers some unique insights, at some length.

He divides sissies into four categories, based on their mix of gender identity and sexual orientation. And it is fascinating, in his concept, what differences and similarities there are between these distinct types of sissy. Of course, many have pointed out before that lots of cross dressers are actually straight men. Some say most of us are. But according to the “Sissy Master” and his breakdown of 4 sissy types, there's more to it than that. Much more.

Here's what he came up with:

1. The Gay / Effeminate Sissy
2. The Bisexual Sissy
3. The Transgender, Gender Fluid Sissy
4. The Straight Sissy

In his lengthy post, the author elaborates at length on each. It's an interesting take, and well worth reading. I can post more about it, we can discuss each, or all of these types, if there's interest. Is 4 types enough? In some cases it seems like the “sissy” identity is a transitional state, or even a role of convenience. A way to rationalize certain tendencies and urges. Also in the age of the internet, I think it's possible that the word itself, “sissy”, has broadened in it's meaning, compared to what it might have meant some decades ago.

prob #2

 

[drobert44]

That’s awesome. I also get lucky from time to time.

So pretty! Loves getting her cock....

 

[Dino1960]

The subject is interesting, but I want to suggest that trying to define "sissy" (or any other kind of person or behavior) into parts tells us more about the writer than the subject. I don't consider myself a "sissy". I'm a male who likes to dress because when I dress, some important part of me gets expressed. I also like to be with women, and sometimes dress with them, because that also expresses part of what I am. I like men who dress, but I've also had a deeply satisfactory experience with a gay man. For me, a connection with another person is about intimacy, playfulness, respect, depth. Sex is a very important part of this, but it doesn't define it. What we are sexually, and as a person (male, female, or something in between), is a spectrum. It's defined by the always unique connection between two people. I'll suggest that there isn't really any such thing as sissy, gay, straight, transexual, etc. Instead, there are the enormous possibilities that occur between people.

I'm much the same. I see my self on the dom side but I also enjoy sucking and deep throating a nice cock so roles should not be defined and every one should just enjoy being with another person pleasuring each other. I dare say some will object though

 

[Stom15720]

Love lipstick

You are beautiful! I love how you exude femininity! Would love getting to know you! Xoxo

 

[neuroparenthetical]

I'll suggest that there isn't really any such thing as sissy, gay, straight, transexual, etc. Instead, there are the enormous possibilities that occur between people.

You say that, but then you've got a billion or so people in the world who just want to have sex with an opposite-sex partner. What exactly are you saying about them? That they're not actually straight, because "straight" doesn't exist? That they're something else, yet-undefined, that you pinkie-swear is sufficiently different in its meta-quality so that you won't claim that it, too, doesn't actually exist?

We're not quantum sub-particles. Possibilities actualize. Just because the straights and spiritualists are scared of us doesn't mean that we have to be scared of them, and commit the mirror-universe versions of all their intellectual errors.

Barring epic blunders and malicious endeavors, labels and categories are useful to a point. Most of the time, they come into existence because they apply very well to a reasonably-large group of scenarios or entities. As long as we don't get stubborn and complacent, we don't need to cast ourselves back into the ether of limitless possibilities. We can use guideposts to help us get to the right general neighborhood faster. We can actualize. There's some fun to be had there that simply isn't available in the ether.

 

[Escierto]

I think you need to read what I wrote again. I'm saying that labels and categories aren't very useful when you are talking about a continuum. I have no idea what you mean by "pinkie-swear" or "meta-quality". Do you? All I'm saying is that there are no boxes when you talk about people. You can't define human behavior with a label or a box. If someone is "straight" (whatever that means) I doubt that they need a map to get where they are going. When someone tries to define "sissy" as one set of behaviors, the term lacks meaning. I'm talking about people, not quantum sub-particles. "Ether"? Does the notion of human complexity make you nervous?

Yes. I can actually relate to some of what might be described as “sissy” behavior. When I get fucked I do feel like a woman taking cock. When I suck cock I do feel submissive as I please my “man”. Sexually I love feeling feminine for my masculine lover.

However in my case I am sucking and being fucked by someone who presents and identifies as a woman. Nor do I have any urge to cross dress.

So it’s complicated.

 

[neuroparenthetical]

I think you need to read what I wrote again. I'm saying that labels and categories aren't very useful when you are talking about a continuum. I have no idea what you mean by "pinkie-swear" or "meta-quality". Do you? All I'm saying is that there are no boxes when you talk about people. You can't define human behavior with a label or a box. If someone is "straight" (whatever that means) I doubt that they need a map to get where they are going. When someone tries to define "sissy" as one set of behaviors, the term lacks meaning. I'm talking about people, not quantum sub-particles. "Ether"? Does the notion of human complexity make you nervous?

"Pinkie-swear" is a dismissive reference to a promise made between young people that they assert is especially binding because of the ritual involved - much how like a "double dog dare" is a bigger deal than a regular dare.

"Meta-quality," in this context, refers to whatever you think is missing from the term "straight," that wouldn't be missing from some hypothetical label that actually would sufficiently encapsulate the feelings and experiences of a person who currently identifies as "straight."

Next time, exercise some humility. Admit you don't understand the terms and then quit while you're ahead.

Human complexity doesn't make me nervous. Human "simplicity" does make me annoyed sometimes. Go ahead and challenge me on whether I know what I meant by ""simplicity"" in this context.

 

[AlexBailey]

I'm saying that labels and categories aren't very useful when you are talking about a continuum.

-snip-

You can't define human behavior with a label or a box.

While I think I understand a lot of what you are trying to say, I completely disagree with this. Labels and categories are a useful shorthand for noting differences without needing to write a paragraph or two to describe someone's interests and proclivities.

I think you need to read what I wrote again. I'm saying that labels and categories aren't very useful when you are talking about a continuum. I All I'm saying is that there are no boxes when you talk about people. You can't define human behavior with a label or a box. If someone is "straight" (whatever that means) I doubt that they need a map to get where they are going. When someone tries to define "sissy" as one set of behaviors, the term lacks meaning. I'm talking about people, not quantum sub-particles. "Ether"? Does the notion of human complexity make you nervous?