Saint_Ann
Enter Title
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2017
- Posts
- 22,848
And there are a lot of pissed off voters.In my state Democrats won 54.37% of the 2024 statewide vote but hold 82.35% of seats (14 of 17). Lol.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And there are a lot of pissed off voters.In my state Democrats won 54.37% of the 2024 statewide vote but hold 82.35% of seats (14 of 17). Lol.![]()
And there are a lot of ... voters grumbling impotently under their breath.![]()
I dunno. I haven't seen it this grumbly in a very long time.Fixed.
I dunno. I haven't seen it this grumbly in a very long time.![]()
It's a Chicago thing.And come November the same bunch of lib nincompoops will be reelected because the grumblers won't show up to vote.
It's a Chicago thing.![]()
Hel_Books said:
And they tell you a barista making a living wage will bring the free market system to disaster while billionaires not paying taxes is no big thing.
Indeed! But I was pointing out that when billionaires avoid paying taxes (or when they squeeze the wages of the less fortunate) they are most definitely NOT contributing to society!The value of what your contribution to society is thru your labors has a direct bearing on your expected compensation. It's not exactly a participation trophy.![]()
What about trickle down?Indeed! But I was pointing out that when billionaires avoid paying taxes (or when they squeeze the wages of the less fortunate) they are most definitely NOT contributing to society!
Hel_Books said:
Indeed! But I was pointing out that when billionaires avoid paying taxes (or when they squeeze the wages of the less fortunate) they are most definitely NOT contributing to society!
Except Trump is breaking the parts of your system that actually work. Or worked before he came along.What about trickle down?
Hence the Trump quote about the system is broken.![]()
Tariffs? What parts?Except Trump is breaking the parts of your system that actually work. Or worked before he came along.
Hel_Books said:
Except Trump is breaking the parts of your system that actually work. Or worked before he came along.
Wasn't the whole idea off GATT and the WTO that free trade brought prosperity (which it did) and protectionism causes economic chaos (as we've seen).Tariffs? What parts?![]()
It was certainly good for Germany and SKorea. The results aren't in.Wasn't the whole idea off GATT and the WTO that free trade brought prosperity (which it did) and protectionism causes economic chaos (as we've seen).
The economy of the USA left everyone else in the dust over the last half century (remember when the Japanese were going to be the kings of the hill?). Trump is looking to kill that and maybe cede economic leadership to China.
Hel_Books said:
Wasn't the whole idea off GATT and the WTO that free trade brought prosperity (which it did) and protectionism causes economic chaos (as we've seen).
The economy of the USA left everyone else in the dust over the last half century (remember when the Japanese were going to be the kings of the hill?). Trump is looking to kill that and maybe cede economic leadership to China.
In comparison, the USA economy has done quite well.It was certainly good for Germany and SKorea. The results aren't in.![]()
"Most economic analyses conclude that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) had only a modest direct impact on the overall US per capita GDP, adding roughly $400 per person annually. While US per-capita GDP grew significantly following the agreement, economists attribute this growth primarily to broader technological advancements and general domestic economic policy rather than the trade deal alone."In comparison, the USA economy has done quite well.
USA per capita GDP increased from $12,575 in 1980 to $90,026 in 2025
Germany's increased from $12,182 to $60,496
South Korea's increased from $1,745 to $36,227
Hel_Books said:
In comparison, the USA economy has done quite well.
USA per capita GDP increased from $12,575 in 1980 to $90,026 in 2025
Germany's increased from $12,182 to $60,496
South Korea's increased from $1,745 to $36,227
If you'll read my earlier posts, you'll see I was referring to the GATT and WTO. But you're right, free trade agreements among North American nations did contribute."Most economic analyses conclude that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) had only a modest direct impact on the overall US per capita GDP, adding roughly $400 per person annually. While US per-capita GDP grew significantly following the agreement, economists attribute this growth primarily to broader technological advancements and general domestic economic policy rather than the trade deal alone."![]()
Won't know the results for years.If you'll read my earlier posts, you'll see I was referring to the GATT and WTO. But you're right, free trade agreements among North American nations did contribute.
Technological advances and economic policy did have a part in everybody's economic progress, but when I wrote that free trade brought prosperity to the USA, you wrote, "It was certainly good for Germany and SKorea." By that omission, did you mean free trade DIDN'T benefit the USA?
By the numbers, it does appear that the USA did quite well through free trade. Trump's tariffs look to take your country, and the world economy, backwards.
Hel_Books said:
If you'll read my earlier posts, you'll see I was referring to the GATT and WTO. But you're right, free trade agreements among North American nations did contribute.
Technological advances and economic policy did have a part in everybody's economic progress, but when I wrote that free trade brought prosperity to the USA, you wrote, "It was certainly good for Germany and SKorea." By that omission, did you mean free trade DIDN'T benefit the USA?
By the numbers, it does appear that the USA did quite well through free trade. Trump's tariffs look to take your country, and the world economy, backwards.
If you make your policies go backwards, it stands to reason your economic numbers will go backwards too. You're ALREADY seeing higher inflation.Won't know the results for years.![]()
Like I said, the impact won't be known for years.If you make your policies go backwards, it stands to reason your economic numbers will go backwards too. You're ALREADY seeing higher inflation.