Sydney Sweeney: Blonde, Beautiful, and Suddenly Dangerous

[jomar]

Apparently you can't read!

To call the president of the United States a piece of shit on a public platform exposes exactly how classless the democrat party has become.

The sad part is you loons believe that that is leadership.

By the way, I wrote that she was the face not the leader or the head..

Well, perhaps you’re correct that Dems have lowered themselves to trump’s level. Shame on us all.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Apparently you can't read!

To call the president of the United States a piece of shit on a public platform exposes exactly how classless the democrat party has become.

The sad part is you loons believe that that is leadership.

By the way, I wrote that she was the face not the leader or the head..

She's getting re-districted out of office. It's a tragedy. *chuckle*

 

[Sean Renaud]

She's getting re-districted out of office. It's a tragedy. *chuckle*

It really is. You have to cheat to get rid of her. That's what a legit threat looks like.

 

[Rebel5soul]

It really is. You have to cheat to get rid of her. That's what a legit threat looks like.

LMAO Re-districting is now "cheating."

Communist scum scream bloody murder when their own tactics are used against them. Tough fucking shit.

 

[schism666]

 

[jomar]

LMAO Re-districting is now "cheating."

Communist scum scream bloody murder when their own tactics are used against them. Tough fucking shit.

Well, Dems aren’t pure snow when it comes to gerrymandering, just ask Maryland. But as your senate guy McConnell said, the more democrats that vote the more republicans lose. Ergo, they gerrymander the most. Just ask Texas.

 

[DynamicFigure]

The downshouting of Sidney Sweeney's American Eagle ads reminds me of ......Facts.

As far back as we have records, and into the present day, anywhere that women are sold as pleasure slaves blonde blue-eyed girls with big racks have been the most in demand.

Our most extensive documentation on this is from the Ottoman Empire. Their slave-takers raided as far north as the west coast of Ireland and even Iceland because a handful of Sidneys could fund years-long expeditions - ships, weapons, provisions, hundreds of men - from the price they fetched on the auction block. And net a healthy profit, too.

But the pattern is everywhere - cross cultural, cross-racial. Evolutionary biologists think they know why: chicks who look like le Sweeney are radiating signals of youth and immune-system effectiveness and general reproductive fitness. Blonde hair fades with age, clear skin doesn't hide blemishes that reveal vulnerability to infection, and I hope nobody reading this needs any education about breast-to-waist-to-hip ratios. If you do, ask an AI for an explainer.

I don't know that anybody's explained the allure of blue eyes satisfactorily yet. We know they're a huge win in the sexual selection game, because of the rapidity with which they propagated. A single point mutation, probably less than 10,000 years ago in Europe, spread like wildfire despite the fact that lack of melanin granules in the iris is recessive.

There's not much that can reveal the instinctive desires of men more clearly than what they're willing to pay to own women who light up their limbic systems. This is revealed preferences with an erection.

It's not just yesterday, either. Every few years somebody busts a semi-covert slave market in some shithole like Mauritania or Afghanistan and it's the same old story. The highest value merchandise is always blonde white girls, usually trafficked from Eastern Europe.

So, yes, when old-school racists ranted about darkies lusting for the flower of white womanhood, they were not wrong. Because, well, basically everybody lusts for the flower of white womanhood. It seems to be wired in.

Interesting read. However, I prefer petite brunettes with lovely brown eyes, and at least darker olive skin or a lovely Latina tone and smaller breasts.

 

[HisArpy]

Interesting read. However, I prefer petite brunettes with lovely brown eyes, and at least darker olive skin or a lovely Latina tone and smaller breasts.

Does that mean the beautiful Chloe Tzang is out of the question?

 

[eric_erosfan]

Does that mean the beautiful Chloe Tzang is out of the question?

Well she's a white dude so...

 

[schism666]

Well she's a white dude so...

if he gives arpy attention, that's all it takes

 

[Sean Renaud]

LMAO Re-districting is now "cheating."

Communist scum scream bloody murder when their own tactics are used against them. Tough fucking shit.

Redistricting mid decade at the behest of the president is absolutely cheating. No quotations needed and its not our own tactics used against us. Not only would we never do this it wasn't that long ago we tried to make this illegal nationwide. I'm not sure that would have worked out for a lot of reasons but at least there was an effort made.

Conservatives are only viable because the game is and always was rigged in your favor.

 

[icanhelp1]

I agree that is below where we should be. The last two decades of the Right attacking Obama and Biden has cleared my eyes of any illusions there. What isn't leadership is taking what Trump and the Right are doing laying down. There is a reason they are polling in the toilet and its because they've been pussies. The world doesn't work that way and no amount of us wanting to be adults makes that a good plan in 2025.

She's not the face either. I doubt she's even the most recognizable.

Parties have always attacked each other, but mostly on policy. That being said, since 2016 the democrats have fed the right a steady diet of personal attacks. No one has been more attacked personally, investigated and accused than Trump. Biden and Trump trading barbs is one thing but for a member of the esteemed people’s house, on a public forum, to call the president of the United States a “piece of shit” is juvenile and just lowers the standards for professional conduct. Democrats are poor losers.

 

[Lazaran]

Parties have always attacked each other, but mostly on policy. That being said, since 2016 the democrats have fed the right a steady diet of personal attacks. No one has been more attacked personally, investigated and accused than Trump. Biden and Trump trading barbs is one thing but for a member of the esteemed people’s house, on a public forum, to call the president of the United States a “piece of shit” is juvenile and just lowers the standards for professional conduct. Democrats are poor losers.

Thus ^ post by ineedhelp1 (a total POS MAGAt) illustrates the level of hypocrisy / projection MAGAts suffer from.

It was DEMOCRATS!!! and "NOT" DonOld & the MAGAt republicans who lowered the discourse to nothing but personal attacks & violent rhetoric…



Meanwhile, AI says:

Donald Trump has frequently used personal attacks against political opponents, often employing mocking and incendiary language. Notable examples include derogatory comments about figures like Jeb Bush, John McCain, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Mitt Romney, Barack & Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Hillary Clinton, where he has referred to them in insulting terms and questioned their capabilities or integrity. Donald Trump has also attacked immigrants & Muslims where he has referred to them in insulting terms and portrayed them as rapists and murderers.



Hope that ^ helps.



ineedhelp1



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[icanhelp1]

Thus ^ post by ineedhelp1 (a total POS MAGAt) illustrates the level of hypocrisy / projection MAGAts suffer from.

It was DEMOCRATS!!! and "NOT" DonOld & the MAGAt republicans who lowered the discourse to nothing but personal attacks & violent rhetoric…



Meanwhile, AI says:

Donald Trump has frequently used personal attacks against political opponents, often employing mocking and incendiary language. Notable examples include derogatory comments about figures like Jeb Bush, John McCain, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Mitt Romney, Barack & Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Hillary Clinton, where he has referred to them in insulting terms and questioned their capabilities or integrity. Donald Trump has also attacked immigrants & Muslims where he has referred to them in insulting terms and portrayed them as rapists and murderers.



Hope that ^ helps.



ineedhelp1



We. Told. Them. So.

During campaigning gloves come off. Jasmine, in a public forum, calling an incumbent president a piece of shit is demeaning the house of the people.

 

[ll74]

During campaigning gloves come off. Jasmine, in a public forum, calling an incumbent president a piece of shit is demeaning the house of the people.

What has dear leader called others?

 

[Lazaran]

During campaigning gloves come off. Jasmine, in a public forum, calling an incumbent president a piece of shit is demeaning the house of the people.

“Fuck your feelings”.

“Fucking snowflake”.



ineedhelp1



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[icanhelp1]

“Fuck your feelings”.

“Fucking snowflake”.



ineedhelp1



We. Told. Them. So.

Conservatives have class, they respect the offices they hold.

Democrats have been taking swings at Trump since 2016. Fuck your feelings when he swings back.

As incompetent as Joe Biden was no congressional office holder ever called him a piece of shit. Dems are a gaggle of low class reprobates.

 

[Rightguide]

You couldn't not bring race into this conversation. A blue blonde in an add that says she has good jeans? That's not even subtle.

^^^
Always the Chicken-bone philosopher.

 

[Sean Renaud]

^^^
Always the Chicken-bone philosopher.

I'm not even sure what the fuck that means.

 

[Rightguide]

I'm not even sure what the fuck that means.

It means that normally you get your "facts" from highly questionable sources.

 

[icanhelp1]

Thus ^ post by ineedhelp1 (a total POS MAGAt) illustrates the level of hypocrisy / projection MAGAts suffer from.

It was DEMOCRATS!!! and "NOT" DonOld & the MAGAt republicans who lowered the discourse to nothing but personal attacks & violent rhetoric…



Meanwhile, AI says:

Donald Trump has frequently used personal attacks against political opponents, often employing mocking and incendiary language. Notable examples include derogatory comments about figures like Jeb Bush, John McCain, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Mitt Romney, Barack & Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Hillary Clinton, where he has referred to them in insulting terms and questioned their capabilities or integrity. Donald Trump has also attacked immigrants & Muslims where he has referred to them in insulting terms and portrayed them as rapists and murderers.



Hope that ^ helps.



ineedhelp1



We. Told. Them. So.

That's just one person and he responds to those that attack him. However, on the other side (DEMS) ya can't go one day without some democrat resorting to profanity against republicans. Use yourself as an example.

When campaigning the gloves come off.

I hope you're on blood pressure meds, you're always sooooo angry.

 

[Sean Renaud]

It means that normally you get your "facts" from highly questionable sources.

Oh. So its a case of you just throwing insults but they don't need to make sense in context. Its not possible to discuss the Sydney Sweeny 'Good GENES' ad without discussing race. At least not while being an honest individual because that's what it was about. I don't see how anybody could even attempt to dispute that.

 

[Rightguide]

Oh. So its a case of you just throwing insults but they don't need to make sense in context. Its not possible to discuss the Sydney Sweeny 'Good GENES' ad without discussing race. At least not while being an honest individual because that's what it was about. I don't see how anybody could even attempt to dispute that.

Your side made the ridiculous argument that the Sweeney ad was about racism. Typical leftwing BS.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Your side made the ridiculous argument that the Sweeney ad was about racism. Typical leftwing BS.

Its a fact. You mean its predictable Liberals having a basic understanding of facts while Conservatives actively lie. This isn't even the first time this exact same ad has run.

 

[stxjimmy]

It means that normally you get your "facts" from highly questionable sources.

Says the boards leading exponent of highly questionable sources.