tolyk
Checked out
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2004
- Posts
- 45,663
Or she could just come up across the border and drink legallyJohnnieJohnson said:Remind me not to serve you when I have a party. (Pssst! The liquor cabinet is in the kitchen and it's unlocked.)

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or she could just come up across the border and drink legallyJohnnieJohnson said:Remind me not to serve you when I have a party. (Pssst! The liquor cabinet is in the kitchen and it's unlocked.)

I have two observations here:FallingToFly said:I just realized... I will adopt AHers teenagers for the summer gladly. they can camp out back and I'll feed them and clothe and entertain them... and work their little tails off between things like canoeing and beach trips and concerts.
I like slave labor, especially when I realize how much I have to do this summer.
So, you send 'em, I'll give you a vacation, lol.![]()
Or, better yet, teach your boys and your girls. Teach your teens the differences between sex for love and sex for fun. Teach them about safe sex. Let them make their own choices.JohnnieJohnson said:If I were the parents of the girls I dated when I was a teenager, I would shoot me. Preferably pre-emptively, but in vengeance after the fact if I had missed the first chance.
Note to teenage girls: When mama tells you those boys only want one thing, listen to her! Note to mamas: When she tells you he loves her, and you find yourself going soft - stiffen up!
grumble, grumble, damned Canucks trying to pick the pockets of the American hospitality industry. grumble, damned hypocritical American politicians giving them the opportunity to do so. grumble grumble. damned foolish 'minor in possession' laws. Let'em get puking drunk in a safe environment, for god sakes, and learn how to do it right, earlytolyk said:Or she could just come up across the border and drink legally![]()
Well yes, there is that. On the other hand, "pick up the pieces" is exactly right, more often than not. I'll agree some balance may be required, and an approach that is a bit more subtle than my first post suggested. But part of that "balance" should include not hesitating to say, "Absolutely not, because I'm an adult and know things that you don't, and I'm thinking with my head not my genitals, and no it's not because there is anything wrong with sex per se or even young sex per se, but it is a powerful thing and you are not giving it the respect it demands, so I am going to exercise my authority and repeat: Absolutely not!"Stella_Omega said:Or, better yet, teach your boys and your girls. Teach your teens the differences between sex for love and sex for fun. Teach them about safe sex. Let them make their own choices.
yes, you'll have to be there to pick up the pieces often enough, but that's what it's all about.
Who the fuck are we parents to tell our girls they mustn't want sex?
JohnnieJohnson said:Well yes, there is that. On the other hand, "pick up the pieces" is exactly right, more often than not. I'll agree some balance may be required, and an approach that is a bit more subtle than my first post suggested. But part of that "balance" should include not hesitating to say, "Absolutely not, because I'm an adult and know things that you don't, and I'm thinking with my head not my genitals, and no it's not because there is anything wrong with sex per se or even young sex per se, but it is a powerful thing and you are not giving it the respect it demands, so I am going to exercise my authority and repeat: Absolutely not!"
I am curious about what our resident 19 year old thinks of that.
JohnnieJohnson said:I have two observations here:
1. This sounds like a proposal to revive the ancient Irish custom of "fosterage," if perhaps for a different purpose. That might not be a bad idea. Children often find it easier to hear wisdom from an adult who is not their parent.
2. The individual above who has generously made the offer (which I believe is sincere, and agree sounds kind of fun in theory, although the reality might be less so), has pasted into her signature line a verse from Bob Seger's "Night Moves." It's not this verse, though:
We werent in love, oh no, far from it
We werent searchin for some pie in the sky summit
We were just young and restless and bored
Livin by the sword
And we'd steal away every chance we could
To the backroom, to the alley or the trusty woods
I used her, she used me
But neither one cared
We were gettin our share
And I really am a good cook. Not to mention completely insane, I teach kids all sorts of strange stuff, like how, exactly, you're supposed to jump out of the top of a tree without getting killed. Or scare the neighbors without saying more than "Hi! I made blueberry muffins and had some leftover, so I thought I'd bring them to you!"Explain, please?Stella_Omega said:That's the "safe" part of safe sex.
It's a generous offer. Parents here should give it serious consideration!FallingToFly said:At one point I had that quote, decided I liked the one I had better. And yeah, it was mostly sincere- do you know how damn hard it's going to be for me alone to accomplish a full re-doing of my house and barn?
Anyone who doesn't mind living in a tent city in the backyard (because my house is tiny) and sharing showers to conserve both time and water, I'm recruiting slave laborAnd I really am a good cook. Not to mention completely insane, I teach kids all sorts of strange stuff, like how, exactly, you're supposed to jump out of the top of a tree without getting killed. Or scare the neighbors without saying more than "Hi! I made blueberry muffins and had some leftover, so I thought I'd bring them to you!"

Sex is not guns. Sex is a means of communication. Guns... aren't.JohnnieJohnson said:Explain, please?
If this were the gun advise thread I would say I've described a parentally installed trigger lock (the "safe" part?) Hopefully it is installed in addition to providing an environment of frank and honest education and discussion about all aspects of this subject, in the context of the bigger picture, which is teaching the youth to make decisions with an eye toward the long view. Hopefully that last part has been done so well that the youth appreciates that the parent is probably right, not that he or she is happy about that. But now I'm certainly dreaming.

I think the dangers you list (pregnancy, STDS, and the "reputation thing") are too limited. (Plus I don't really give a damn about the last one.) I'm thinking about the emotional dangers. And what might be thought of as kind of an "opportunity cost" of entering adulthood without learning that to live a full and satisfying life, one must appeciate that there is more to life than focusing so intensely on the pleasures of the moment, including sensual ones. That's what I mean by the long view. In some realms it's easy to cite examples: Study your calculus rather than going to the mall, so you can have a satisfying and financially rewarding career. Eat and drink in moderation, and exercise, so you don't become unhealthily obese. Doing those things are hard, but the benefits are obvious. In this discussion of sexuality the things to do and not do are less obvious, and the benefits are less clear because in a way they are almost spiritual (in a completely non-religious way). I'm afraid I would need to think about this a lot more to be able to describe it well, if I ever could. Hopefully readers will get a sense of what I'm trying to convey. Maybe someone who does could help out, if I haven't become hopelessly fuzzy and pie-in-sky.Stella_Omega said:Sex is not guns. Sex is a means of communication. Guns... aren't.![]()
I don't know if we've met before? I am fifty years old and the mother of two teens.![]()
There are dangers associated with sex, sure. Pregnancy, STDS, and the "reputation thing."
Pregnancy and STDS can be prevented by teaching safe sexual practices.
the "reputation thing" can be prevented by teaching discretion and social skills. Or, as my dad put it, "Don't sleep with more than one guy in a group"- advice which I merrily ignored.
Conflating sex with love makes for jealousy and broken hearts, but that's part of growing up. Those happen to teens with or without sex.
The only other thing I can think of might be a danger to the parents if they are percieved as aiding and abetting their children- if they consider their child's sexual life as part of their social life, you know. My parents wouldn't let me stay overnight with my boyfriends, or let them stay at our house overnight.
What's the "long view" you are woried about?
In the context of my last post, I wonder if there is some value to leaving some space for the facts you describe by deliberately being an "inefficient enforcer" in situations that are not intrinsically dangerous. That is, let them think they are putting one over on you, and let them get away with it. At the same time, most of the time you exercise greater control, and that is the "official" policy, and as far as the they know, the only policy. I recognize that this is somewhat abstract and I'm now talking about an idealized situation; the day-to-day realities are messier and less clear cut. But I'm trying to discover and describe some useful general principles.Daniellekitten said:But they are also going to do what they want to do whether you want them to or not. If my parents knew some of the stuff I did, well, I probably would still be grounded. Kids do what they want, even if we don't want them to.
Pregnancy and STDS can be "limited" by teaching safe sex. I got a girl pregnant while using a condom and some STDs can still be transmitted while using protection.Stella_Omega said:Sex is not guns. Sex is a means of communication. Guns... aren't.![]()
I don't know if we've met before? I am fifty years old and the mother of two teens.![]()
There are dangers associated with sex, sure. Pregnancy, STDS, and the "reputation thing."
Pregnancy and STDS can be prevented by teaching safe sexual practices.
the "reputation thing" can be prevented by teaching discretion and social skills. Or, as my dad put it, "Don't sleep with more than one guy in a group"- advice which I merrily ignored.
Conflating sex with love makes for jealousy and broken hearts, but that's part of growing up. Those happen to teens with or without sex.
The only other thing I can think of might be a danger to the parents if they are percieved as aiding and abetting their children- if they consider their child's sexual life as part of their social life, you know. My parents wouldn't let me stay overnight with my boyfriends, or let them stay at our house overnight.
What's the "long view" you are woried about?
JohnnieJohnson said:I think the dangers you list (pregnancy, STDS, and the "reputation thing") are too limited. (Plus I don't really give a damn about the last one.) I'm thinking about the emotional dangers. And what might be thought of as kind of an "opportunity cost" of entering adulthood without learning that to live a full and satisfying life, one must appeciate that there is more to life than focusing so intensely on the pleasures of the moment, including sensual ones. That's what I mean by the long view. In some realms it's easy to cite examples: Study your calculus rather than going to the mall, so you can have a satisfying and financially rewarding career. Eat and drink in moderation, and exercise, so you don't become unhealthily obese. Doing those things are hard, but the benefits are obvious. In this discussion of sexuality the things to do and not do are less obvious, and the benefits are less clear because in a way they are almost spiritual (in a completely non-religious way). I'm afraid I would need to think about this a lot more to be able to describe it well, if I ever could. Hopefully readers will get a sense of what I'm trying to convey. Maybe someone who does could help out, if I haven't become hopelessly fuzzy and pie-in-sky.
I think that in all these areas, to teach these things one must believe it enough to be willing to live it and really mean it, which sometimes means imposing certain limits. Maybe it's an old fashioned notion. Maybe really old fashioned, like Aristotle-old.
I get you.