Ten at the most

A young woman should, in her teens and 20s, have sex with 10 at the most.

  • Sounds about right

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sounds about right, assuming some things do not count

    Votes: 6 26.1%
  • Sounds too high; even possibly slutty

    Votes: 7 30.4%
  • Sounds too low; just use condoms and 'who's counting?'

    Votes: 10 43.5%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .
Joe Wordsworth said:
Unfortunately, if the number is high, I think less of the girl. I feel less inclined to be another notch, the more of them there are; and the only women I've known that could boast 10+ at 20 are very much skanky-ho-like.

How would you even know such intimate details of her life. Hopefully, not from locker-room gossip or bragging idiots. Personally, I would have no problem being another notch, be it the 11th, the 21st, or the thousandth.
 
Joe Wordsworth said:
Differently.

Actually, I'd say something similar, but not because of moral reasons. Frankly, if a guy's an ass hole who fucks around, he's risking contracting VD. But then, I do women, so he's not my problem...

Women on the other hand, might view him differently than they view a guy who hasn't been around, because, if they're straight, guys like him can become their problem.

Again: It comes down to "Are you clean?"

Q_C
 
Joe did say unfortunately at the beginning of what he said. And also he never said it was a truthful or a good thing that he thought like he did, he was just being honest about what he does think and I think (lots of thinking going in here) there are probably alot of blokes who have the same approach.

For me I have only slept with one guy in the north of the UK sleeping with 10 guys would label a woman as loose in alot of peoples books. Hmmm I bet some womans mag or other has done reasearch on this...Anyhow just because maybe its a politically incorrect idea doesn't mean it's not one that doesn't exsist...
 
matriarch said:
Oh, but didn't you realise, sweets?? No matter what they say, for some men, there are still two different sets of rules and standards.

And some women... maybe most men... maybe most women--to give it some perspective.

Prolific men can still 'sow their wild oats and learn to be a man'.
Prolific women will always be sluts.

I think that's an accurate way of putting how most people might see the issue.

*shrug*. I'm just disappointed that I'm surprised this attitude still exists - in the minds of some. :rolleyes:

And it does.
 
Boxlicker101 said:
How would you even know such intimate details of her life. Hopefully, not from locker-room gossip or bragging idiots. Personally, I would have no problem being another notch, be it the 11th, the 21st, or the thousandth.
All it takes is paying attention to her boasting... keeping track of who she goes home with... and still giving her the benifit of the doubt.
 
Being sexually irresposible is not a question of numbers.

ANd that's all I have to say about that.

#L
 
You know, I guess what bothers me is that this is a porn board, where I expected people to be more open minded and accepting. Obviously, that's not always the case.
So, oh well. I'm a slut then.
And proud of it. My sexuality is part of who I am and I won't be ashamed of it. I am clean, I am smart about picking my partners, and I am also a loyal, loving and faithful person.
I just like sex and will continue to like sex. Call me a slut if you want, or a "skanky ho" if that makes you feel better. But I am who I am.

SJ
 
Joe Wordsworth said:
I remember I dated a girl once who eventually told me she'd slept with five guys and I was dissappointed. I didn't choose to be disappointed, I just was.

the first step to correcting a flaw is to be aware that it exists...involuntary reactions are not necessarily something for which you need be ashamed.

However, if you recognize the discrepency in your attitudes well enough that you feel the need to defend having the thought and then do not attempt to change them?
 
sophia jane said:
You know, I guess what bothers me is that this is a porn board, where I expected people to be more open minded and accepting. Obviously, that's not always the case.
So, oh well. I'm a slut then.
And proud of it. My sexuality is part of who I am and I won't be ashamed of it. I am clean, I am smart about picking my partners, and I am also a loyal, loving and faithful person.
I just like sex and will continue to like sex. Call me a slut if you want, or a "skanky ho" if that makes you feel better. But I am who I am.

SJ

Well, you shouldn't be ashamed of it... don't see where anyone said you ought. And while it's a porn board, I think its narrow minded to think that everyone who writes or reads porn is somehow not as diverse as people just are.
 
sophia jane said:
You know, I guess what bothers me is that this is a porn board, where I expected people to be more open minded and accepting. Obviously, that's not always the case.
So, oh well. I'm a slut then.
And proud of it. My sexuality is part of who I am and I won't be ashamed of it. I am clean, I am smart about picking my partners, and I am also a loyal, loving and faithful person.
I just like sex and will continue to like sex. Call me a slut if you want, or a "skanky ho" if that makes you feel better. But I am who I am.

SJ
Quoting myself, just minutes ago:

"Being sexually irresposible is not a question of numbers."

:)
 
Liar said:
Being sexually irresposible is not a question of numbers.

ANd that's all I have to say about that.

#L

Ahhh, yes.

And promiscuity is very much like a box of chocolates, is it not?

;)

Q_C
 
Belegon said:
the first step to correcting a flaw is to be aware that it exists...involuntary reactions are not necessarily something for which you need be ashamed.
I don't feel ashamed for my involuntary reactions. Despite some people wanting to make this a "fuck Joe" situation, I'm confidant everyone here has things that feel or think that aren't subject to their immediate preference. I don't feel ashamed for thinking what I do. Being honest about it shouldn't be subject to ridicule or lambasting, either.

However, if you recognize the discrepency in your attitudes well enough that you feel the need to defend having the thought and then do not attempt to change them?
I feel the need to clarify that I have the thought and what that means in the face of people assuming it to be more meaningful than "just is". As though I intend it to be something when it just isn't. Changing the opinion? Would take exposure to promiscuous women who weren't creepy and whatnot. I'm confidant if I were reasonably good friends with an attractive, smart, eloquent prostitute... my opinion might change dramatically over time.

I am not exposed to such things, really.
 
Liar said:
Being sexually irresposible is not a question of numbers.

ANd that's all I have to say about that.

#L
Very well said. I agree completely.
 
Joe Wordsworth said:
I'm confidant if I were reasonably good friends with an attractive, smart, eloquent prostitute... my opinion might change dramatically over time.

I am not exposed to such things, really.

Wait, wait! Has anyone mentioned prostitutes? Are promiscuity and prostitute synonymous for you? If so, there are a great whooping number of male whores, eh?
 
Last edited:
Joe Wordsworth said:
I don't feel ashamed for my involuntary reactions. Despite some people wanting to make this a "fuck Joe" situation, I'm confidant everyone here has things that feel or think that aren't subject to their immediate preference. I don't feel ashamed for thinking what I do. Being honest about it shouldn't be subject to ridicule or lambasting, either.


I feel the need to clarify that I have the thought and what that means in the face of people assuming it to be more meaningful than "just is". As though I intend it to be something when it just isn't. Changing the opinion? Would take exposure to promiscuous women who weren't creepy and whatnot. I'm confidant if I were reasonably good friends with an attractive, smart, eloquent prostitute... my opinion might change dramatically over time.

I am not exposed to such things, really.


I said my piece. I am not looking to make this another "pick on Joe" thread. What you do with what I said is up to you.

Even if you do feel that you want to change that attitude, it will be difficult to work on something that built up over time and on a sub-concious level.

Changing the opinion? Would take exposure to promiscuous women who weren't creepy and whatnot.

ok, and just what the fuck do you think you are being exposed to here? Look around these boards. I think you have a great place to start with that. Or do you mean it has to be a physical exposure? *sigh*
 
Liar said:
Quoting myself, just minutes ago:

"Being sexually irresposible is not a question of numbers."

:)

I think this is where the problems are coming from. Perhaps Joe is merely looking at the basics and viewing people who are promiscuous are irresponsible, instead of seeing the irresponsible people ten dot be promiscuous. The latter tends to be true, and let's face it, on the whole, irresponsible people outnumber responsible ones. That last part might be negative thinking on my part, I suppose.

Q_C
 
sigh...

A woman who loves sex and has had the pleasure of being with several guys should not be labelled a "skanky ho". That term is disgusting.
As most of us know, sex is incredible and fun and anyone who has the opportunity should go for it! (as long as you are protected and clean) Any attempt to define the "correct" number of partners is ridiculous and meaningless.
 
www.bruce. said:
Any attempt to define the "correct" number of partners is ridiculous and meaningless.

I disagree. The "correct" number is ... MORE!
 
Belegon said:
I said my piece. I am not looking to make this another "pick on Joe" thread.
That, I appreciate.
Even if you do feel that you want to change that attitude, it will be difficult to work on something that built up over time and on a sub-concious level.
Such is the case with most socially ingrained and socially supported views, I should think. Though I don't think it's necessarily sub-conscious.
Changing the opinion? Would take exposure to promiscuous women who weren't creepy and whatnot.

ok, and just what the fuck do you think you are being exposed to here? Look around these boards. I think you have a great place to start with that. Or do you mean it has to be a physical exposure? *sigh*
Real life is different than this place. Very, very different. It would take being around such people in a social, every day situation to overthrow opinions born and supported by social, every day situations. That is what I "fucking" think about it.
 
Back
Top