The Fundamental Principles of this Great Nation Would be in Jeopardy

[lavender]

I am posting more from feeling then looking at a detailed copy of his voting record. Obama feels more liberal then Kerry to me and I think his voting record at least in 2007 was more liberal then Kerry. Of course a one year voting record is not a very good measure either.

The reason any presidential candidate's voting record is skewed is normally they only go back to Washington to vote on things that they believe are incredibly important votes. Therefore, all candidates have a record that is somewhat skewed in years they run for election.

 

[Azwed]

The reason any presidential candidate's voting record is skewed is normally they only go back to Washington to vote on things that they believe are incredibly important votes. Therefore, all candidates have a record that is somewhat skewed in years they run for election.

Hmh that's a great explanation I had not heard of before but it makes sense.

 

[Freya]

So what's your point?

You unhappy that I continue to participate in this thread? If so, why?

The discussion is fine with the hippo gone.

Nice comment from an anorexic bone bag.

Seriously, you have nothing better than fat insults?

 

[Aliea]

So what's your point?

You unhappy that I continue to participate in this thread? If so, why?

The discussion is fine with the hippo gone.

You're a man, aren't you? A man who uses wiki as a crutch to make your arguments, to fool the easily fooled into believing you are smart. There is really no shame in it, aside from the gender bending. A lot of people here use google and wiki to combat posts that are above their heads.

 

[miles]

you know Miles, no matter how much you champion dear, young, immature Karen - I still doubt she'll phone bone you.

It worked with you.

 

[richard_daily]

You're a man, aren't you? A man who uses wiki as a crutch to make your arguments, to fool the easily fooled into believing you are smart. There is really no shame in it, aside from the gender bending. A lot of people here use google and wiki to combat posts that are above their heads.

I don't think there's anything wrong with gender bending, that's kind of a low blow.

Although one would hope that in a good, liberal society, one would be able to be open about such things...

 

[JinXed]

So what's your point?

You unhappy that I continue to participate in this thread? If so, why?

The discussion is fine with the hippo gone.

Oh, I think you got my point. Several times.

It worked with you.

I didn't see that one coming, nosireebob /palin

I'm pretty happy to say that I'm one of the oldies who did ignore your pm's and attempts to flirt your way into my little cyber panties.




I try to stay out of most of the political discussions, oh hell I'm not really around much to play a part in most discussions here anymore, Lavy - so I've probably got a bit of snark stored up.

 

[mark_j]

Simple, how would the Founding Fathers think about taking money from "the free market" oil companies and giving it to every citizen?

Maybe California should start taking dividends from Produce companies?

Or Washington could take some of Boeing's profits and distribute them?

Alaska negotiated those contracts with the oil companies right?

Cali and Washington didn't...

Even simpler..

 

[Odd_ball]

Alaska negotiated those contracts with the oil companies right?

Cali and Washington didn't...

Even simpler..

What is the difference? Both are governments interferring in "free market".

 

[mark_j]

What is the difference? Both are governments interferring in "free market".

Government interferes with "free market" all the time through regulation or taxes.. you know that

 

[Odd_ball]

Government interferes with "free market" all the time through regulation or taxes.. you know that

And according to KK, Palin is against such interference.

lol

 

[mark_j]

And according to KK, Palin is against such interference.

lol

Yeah well be realistic... political rhetoric may get headlines but it doesn't cut it in the end... if it was true then governments would have no money for police services, fire departments and on and on.. So the idea of a true free market without government interference is a pipe dream at best since they are interfering by taxation or regulation...

It's really damn simple...