Kumquatqueen
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2017
- Posts
- 5,563
Now that *is* somewhat disturbing...I'm basically your mum, too.
R is American, no under-17s allowed without a supervising adult (no idea if your 18yo friend counts?). Below that is PG-13, which recommends a supervising adult (no idea if your 18yo friend counts?). Below that is PG-13 which recommends younger kids not be taken but doesn't prevent them.That was my take (my post above, only there to please @AwkwardlySet, but blanked so that poor old @SimonDoom can read only if he wants to).
What's the criteria for an R rating in the UK and US?
In the UK, cinema ratings above PG are 12A (under 12s only allowed with an adult), 15 and 18 (no-one under those ages allowed at all, which nowadays is actually enforced, which is kinda tough on kids without passports and probably a factor in the decline in cinema-going). For buying media to watch at home, there's a 12 rating.
A 15 (like the Odyssey) will typically have a bit of swearing but not directed at people, some brief nudity, brief consensual sex scenes that aren't zoomed in on, and some violence that isn't too sick-making nor anything that might encourage imitation. Sexual violence and nasty realistic violence will net you an 18 rating. So like the Aussie MA and R, but nudged up a grade for the unnerving pigs.
My guess is the American classifiers judged it as too much unnerving violence for young kids to see without a supervising adult, and there's a fair bit of swearing.
It was actually the sailors who mum thought were unrealistically diverse, with prominent black guys and a Chinese-looking guy who went overboard - she figured Helen could well have been 'exotic' and more to the point could actually act!
Here in Australian it's M, for violence, mature themes, and coarse language, which is a mild rating (parental guidance, really). We also have MA (technically, a 16 year old limit, add in sexual content or up the violence) and R (sexual content including full frontal nudity, extreme violence). Films aren't censored (except by the studio, if they want to target a lower rating), just the rating given on the film as presented to the Board.
M is typical of most releases these days. An R (which must be equivalent to Australia's MA) would seem excessive to me (especially given that it will stream in six months time).
The whole woke debate seems to be American bullshit, from what I can see. Black girl, so what? Trans actor, so fucking what (too short to be a soldier, but really?). It didn't strike me as A Movie With an Agenda, more a filmmaker trying to find a source for new content, having too many things to squeeze in, and needing a much more aggressive editor who would say no. Or two movies, paced much much better, with some human drama, not just looking good.
It's Cecil B DeMille for the twenty-first century. Remake Cleopatra next, and cast an Egyptian actress to really fuck the squealing "critics" minds up.

