This is Your Typical Liberal and Why Normal People Think You'll All Insane



The country is more liberal than you think, it's just that you pansy ass scared right wing fuckbags are more motivated to vote.



Your party is pox to society. I wish all of you would just go to an island and live there, let the sane, rational people live happily without being bothered by you sanctimonious, hypocritical asses.


No its not and the USA is that island you moron lol
 
Wow, the bullshit in this one is strong

Do you even know a muslim?

Secondly, why would you intentionally go out of your way to intentonally violate another religons tenents directly to their face

Third, not all Christians think that way, or Leviticus would never be used to justify anything. And if you dont think it has, you're just stupid

Fourth, this in no way changes my post.. what difference is there between someone who thinks they get virgins in heaven any different then someone who thinks marrying half a dozen 13 year olds is fine

Fifth, I dont even know what Mohammed looks like, seeing as I'm not Muslim. Nor would I depict Jesus, as being a very lapsed Catholic I know that depicting Jesus for worship without sanction is a sin. Yes, Christianity is not cool with iconography either. Literally tens of thousands died because of it during the Cathar heresesy

Sixth, being born and raised in North America, I have spent my life watching politicians use the bible to justify their reasons for trying bringing morality into legislation. But ironically, I have not seen Muslims do the same in north America

Seventh, just because I support a persons right to peacefully worship thier own religon in no way does that mean i endorse that religon. I would never be a muslim, but I would also never be a mormon

So once again, and my point stands, why are those who view the Bible as the highest form of law in any different from those who view the Koran as the highest point of law

Man... should I? Hmm... this comes pretty close to that level of crazy. Yeah, why not? Let's do it!

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/f9/f9d031e5ece3cef14379307bdb0293e61225f697833f4223c093a18c6a0d066a.jpg
 
You know the funny part, right wing fuckbags think EVERY ONE shares their same diseased views.

The country is more liberal than you think, it's just that you pansy ass scared right wing fuckbags are more motivated to vote.


Your brains are wired to show that you are easily frightened like small animals and that emboldens your asses to vote.


And right wing politicians are masters at cheating and helping to suppress votes of normal, sane human beings.

Your party is pox to society. I wish all of you would just go to an island and live there, let the sane, rational people live happily without being bothered by you sanctimonious, hypocritical asses.


Just like your earlier statements you're mixing a "biological" basis for conservatism with the idea that they are "evil" somehow.

Pretty sure Bernie's votes weren't stolen by right wing masters of political sabotage.
 
Wow, the bullshit in this one is strong

Do you even know a muslim?

Secondly, why would you intentionally go out of your way to intentonally violate another religons tenents directly to their face

Third, not all Christians think that way, or Leviticus would never be used to justify anything. And if you dont think it has, you're just stupid

Fourth, this in no way changes my post.. what difference is there between someone who thinks they get virgins in heaven any different then someone who thinks marrying half a dozen 13 year olds is fine

Fifth, I dont even know what Mohammed looks like, seeing as I'm not Muslim. Nor would I depict Jesus, as being a very lapsed Catholic I know that depicting Jesus for worship without sanction is a sin. Yes, Christianity is not cool with iconography either. Literally tens of thousands died because of it during the Cathar heresesy

Sixth, being born and raised in North America, I have spent my life watching politicians use the bible to justify their reasons for trying bringing morality into legislation. But ironically, I have not seen Muslims do the same in north America

Seventh, just because I support a persons right to peacefully worship thier own religon in no way does that mean i endorse that religon. I would never be a muslim, but I would also never be a mormon

So once again, and my point stands, why are those who view the Bible as the highest form of law in any different from those who view the Koran as the highest point of law

No I don't, but that has nothing to do with observable events.

Secondly, don't Pride parades do exactly that?

Third, he's stated previously he is anti-Christianity. But there is a difference between the size of their radical populations.

Fourth, not much. I didn't realize anyone here was arguing in favor of underage polygamy.

Fifth, that's so disingenuous. It might be a sin but you know full well that the depiction of Mohammed (whatever it/he looks like) will spark violent protest whereas a depiction of Jesus will not.

Sixth, I live right next to this town https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/06/somali-refugees-missouri/97548508/

Seventh, me too.

Lastly, because despite their vocality they do not wield anywhere near as much real world power.
 
No I don't, but that has nothing to do with observable events.

it entirely does, I can show you dozens of examples of people trying to enforce biblical law into federal law, yet I cant with Islam..so what's the biggest threat to our legal system, the Bible or the Koran?

Secondly, don't Pride parades do exactly that?

on what planet do Pride parades violate someone else practicing their religon

Third, he's stated previously he is anti-Christianity. But there is a difference between the size of their radical populations.

So? In no way changes the point

Fourth, not much. I didn't realize anyone here was arguing in favor of underage polygamy.

Yet, the only underage polygamists we hear about in North America are usually some sort of Christian sect

Fifth, that's so disingenuous. It might be a sin but you know full well that the depiction of Mohammed (whatever it/he looks like) will spark violent protest whereas a depiction of Jesus will not.

once again, why the fuck would you do that in the first place. Might as well go into a church in buttfuck alabama and have anal sex with the pastor during a sermon



ummm yeah, your point being?.. nowhere in the article does it state they have attempted to change the law

Seventh, me too.

Lastly, because despite their vocality they do not wield anywhere near as much real world power.

exactly, Bible thumpers wield oodles of real world power in North America as
 
But yet, the bible is often the basis for these few Christians have used to attempt to change legislation.

Cant say muslims have done the same in north america

There have been some blue laws that were inspired by the Bible, but I believe most or all of them have been repealed or overturned by the courts.

And, Muslims have tried to establish Sharia Law in the US and Canada: http://toprightnews.com/muslims-tri...hey-didnt-count-on-this-mayors-epic-response/

http://www.canadianlawsite.ca/sharia-law-canada.htm

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/america-sharia-law.html

They have had only limited success so far, but they have been trying. :eek:
 
it entirely does, I can show you dozens of examples of people trying to enforce biblical law into federal law, yet I cant with Islam..so what's the biggest threat to our legal system, the Bible or the Koran?

That wasn't even the 1st question, refer down

on what planet do Pride parades violate someone else practicing their religon?

He said violate their tenets (i.e. homo=bad) to their face. Not interfere with their practice.

So? In no way changes the point

I'm blank on how you can think that it doesn't

Yet, the only underage polygamists we hear about in North America are usually some sort of Christian sect

And? Point still stands that nobody here is arguing for it. You could also check the numbers here vs other areas. Much better.

once again, why the fuck would you do that in the first place. Might as well go into a church in buttfuck alabama and have anal sex with the pastor during a sermon

I wouldn't but just because someone else would doesn't mean they deserve to die.
(Draw Mohammed not buttfuck a Baptist, I'd probably do that)



ummm yeah, your point being?.. nowhere in the article does it state they have attempted to change the law

The article doesn't talk about how they've forced the plant to shut down 5 times a day for prayer, and "don't treat women well" is a euphemism.


exactly, Bible thumpers wield oodles of real world power in North America as

They wield some power yes but is it comparable to the power Isis or Boko Haram wield in their territory?
 
Last edited:
That wasn't even the 1st question, refer down

You were referring to observable events, as was I, a terrorist attack is not the same as a former President creating a Jesus Day ( because apparently Christmas wasnt enough).

One is hate, one is law



He said violate their tenets (i.e. homo=bad) to their face. Not interfere with their practice.


Being gay to someone's face will in no way change a persons abilities to practice their faith. No one is forcing any practitioner of any faith to attend a Pride Parade, attending would be the devotees choice. If anyone is violating their beliefs, it's the dumbass who went knowing it would happen

I'm blank on how you can think that it doesn't

Because it doesnt matter how big or small radicals are in any faith if that group is trying to legislate their beliefs, and getting away with it



And? Point still stands that nobody here is arguing for it. You could also check the numbers here vs other areas. Much better.


So? I live in an area that has a huge muslim refugee population. To date the number of legislative changes; zero


I wouldn't but just because someone else would doesn't mean they deserve to die.
(Draw Mohammed not buttfuck a Baptist, I'd probably do that)

And yet, that hasn't happened in north america, funny that





The article doesn't talk about how they've forced the plant to shut down 5 times a day for prayer, and "don't treat women well" is a euphemism.

Once again, the choice of the business owners, they can hire non muslims to work during breaks after all.Or simply making a policy that religous observances can not be held in a workplace, which would be entirely legal; multiple businesses do that already

and dude, in order to shut down for the 5 prayers the plant would have to be running at minimum 20 hours a day




They wield some power yes but is it comparable to the power Isis or Boko Haram wield in their territory?

which is completely irrelevant to the point, both of those groups are terrorist groups. And there are are multiple Christian and Jewish terrorist groups too, and they are also irrelevant

what is relevant is the simple issue is why should one persons belief that their faiths doctrines should be law be not as bad as another groups belief that their faith should be law
 
You were referring to observable events, as was I, a terrorist attack is not the same as a former President creating a Jesus Day ( because apparently Christmas wasnt enough).
One is hate, one is law


And you don't have to know a Christian to have known that do you? Point.

Being gay to someone's face will in no way change a persons abilities to practice their faith. No one is forcing any practitioner of any faith to attend a Pride Parade, attending would be the devotees choice. If anyone is violating their beliefs, it's the dumbass who went knowing it would happen

Once again he said intentonally violate another religons tenents directly to their face
It was just one example. Maybe conservative Christians aren't going to Pride, doesn't mean they aren't exposed to it.

Because it doesnt matter how big or small radicals are in any faith if that group is trying to legislate their beliefs, and getting away with it

Sure, but they're not really are they? Non-Christians (including myself) consistently stand up to fight and strike down such attempts.

So? I live in an area that has a huge muslim refugee population. To date the number of legislative changes; zero

Is it a small rural area like the one hear me where they've become statistically significant? I get what you're saying, when my state passed legislation defining Sharia as unconstitutional I thought, no shit?, is this what we're wasting our time on?[/QUOTE]

And yet, that hasn't happened in north america, funny that

Most of this doesn't happen in N. America, most of it is happening in Europe and the Middle East right now.

Nobody is saying America is a utopia, or anywhere near it, or that ultra conservative Christians don't pose some sort of a threat. Its just disingenuous to compare the threat posed by Isis vs. the Westboro Baptist Church. Westboro wishes they were as relevant and powerful.

(Continued next post)






Once again, the choice of the business owners, they can hire non muslims to work during breaks after all.Or simply making a policy that religous observances can not be held in a workplace, which would be entirely legal; multiple businesses do that already

and dude, in order to shut down for the 5 prayers the plant would have to be running at minimum 20 hours a day






which is completely irrelevant to the point, both of those groups are terrorist groups. And there are are multiple Christian and Jewish terrorist groups too, and they are also irrelevant

what is relevant is the simple issue is why should one persons belief that their faiths doctrines should be law be not as bad as another groups belief that their faith should be law[/QUOTE]
 
I was raised by my mother who was pretty far along on the evangelical crazy scale. Only Christian music was allowed in the house. Every tv show/movie inspected for "questionable" moments. In church minimum 3x a week. Usually more.

My mother inspected my backpack to make sure I wasn't sneaking sinful material home from school because I began suffering from epilepsy at 12yo. So obviously I must have sinned and been possessed by an evil spirit of illness right? I was forced to fall asleep to recorded prayers and never allowed near members of the female sex.

When I was 18 and didn't live with her anymore I told my mom in response to something I can't remember that there is such a thing as moral grey, that the world wasn't completely black and white. She didn't sleep for the next 3 days while she was busy praying for my soul.

Not a fan of religious nuts.
 
You should be careful with your words. Most of them are armed.

You know, every know and then you say something that's so sensible I worry for you. Just come over to the side of light phrodeau, you know you belong with us, really you do.
 
The right wing nutcases on this board continue to bitch about the progressive party, YET, think about it, would Republicans approve of such a site called LITEROTICA? They would want to shut down erotic literature and porn if they had their way.

I don't know how one can be right wing (you know the moral party) and hangout 24/7 on Literotica oogling fetish and sexuality posts and pictures of nude women. Doesn't it go against your Christo-fascist ideals?

LOL.
 
The right wing nutcases on this board continue to bitch about the progressive party, YET, think about it, would Republicans approve of such a site called LITEROTICA? They would want to shut down erotic literature and porn if they had their way.

I don't know how one can be right wing (you know the moral party) and hangout 24/7 on Literotica oogling fetish and sexuality posts and pictures of nude women. Doesn't it go against your Christo-fascist ideals?

LOL.

Well if you had bothered to read the actual posts you would realize that not all of us are right wing or religious.
 
Back
Top