Titty-fuck: Humiliating, or not?

[dr_mabeuse]

I'm not fond of "tits" or "titty," but I'm feeling rather crude tonight. I might even say cock. OMG, I just said it! Cock!

Me too. I really hate the word "titty". There's something very snide and adolescent-nasty about it.

Breasts are so sweet and benign. They don't cause trouble like cocks do. There's no nasty stuff that comes out of them like asses. They're pure and innocent and only do good things: a source of nourishment when we're young, a source of pleasure when we're older. They deserve some nice, munificent, voluptuous name. Something like "malomars" but with more syllables.

---dr.M.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I don't know about this Box... I mean, a woman could just as easily use her hands to get him off. It's got to be something like genitalia to body part. The cunninglus is probably a good example, though not the best. It shouldn't be about oral sex, either. Hmmm... gotta think about this some more.

I don't think there is any equivalent to a tit or titty fuck. Men and women both have asses and both have hands and mouths. A woman has a pussy and man has a cock. (Hooray) but there is nothing male that is even remotely equivalent to a woman's breasts. Maybe if he lies down on his back and she removes his shoe and gets herself off on his toe? That's not much of an equivalent either because toes are not usually sex organs while breasts are. That does seem more reasonable than rubbing herself against his leg or something, because there can be penetration, or she can hold his foot and frig her clit with his toe.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Me too. I really hate the word "titty". There's something very snide and adolescent-nasty about it.

Breasts are so sweet and benign. They don't cause trouble like cocks do. There's no nasty stuff that comes out of them like asses. They're pure and innocent and only do good things: a source of nourishment when we're young, a source of pleasure when we're older. They deserve some nice, munificent, voluptuous name. Something like "malomars" but with more syllables.

---dr.M.

An anatomy book calls them mammary glands. Sometimes they are called mammaries. Is that good enough?

I must agree they are sweet and benign, which is one of the reasons I don't call them jugs or hooters or knockers or any of the other unpleasant and unflattering terms.

 

[angela146]

Tit-fucking can be seriously humiliating for the man if you know how to use it.

Consider that I have three ways of letting a guy inside me. If he's tit-fucking me, it's because I'm not letting him inside any of the actual entrances.

It's like sex on top of the blankets or a date without a good-night kiss, or a kiss on the cheek.

Tit-fucking can send a clear message: I'll have sex with you, sort of, but I don't want to do anything intimate like actually giving you a blow job. Oh, and the odds of my actually getting off on this with you are... hmmmm... zero.

Sure a tit-fuck can be fun as a change of pace but it's also a *very* powerful way of saying "not quite".

I like to think of it as... (wait for it)... the booby prize.

 

[angela146]

Breasts are so sweet and benign. They don't cause trouble like cocks do. ... They're pure and innocent and only do good things ...

They can cause traffic accidents.

 

[Kathie the Glorious]

I've done it before when she was on her period. It was more of a helping me to get off, rather than mutual gratification (now that I look back on it). She wanted to try something different, trather than the usual blowjob to get me off.

I liked it. I think its partly about power. The power of the man over the woman. But its also about learning how much of the human body enjoys pleasure, in all forms.

She liked it too. The nipple play got her off too, something that was very hard when she was on her period, and trust me, SHE'S TRIED.

 

[McKenna]

.

 

[fille]

I'm a bit humiliated about the fact that I don't have sufficient boobs for a really good titty fuck. Does that count?

Seriously, I never knew that it was considered a form of humiliation. I don't see why it should be.

 

[angela146]

--It only works if they're big enough to mash together.

--You can't pin her arms down with your knees because she needs her hands to press her boobs together. Unless she's siliconed, boobs that big only stand up on her chest to produce a cleavage only in dirty stories. In nature, a thing called gravity pulls them down to the sides. So long, cleavage.

Consider the following position:

The Woman lays on her back while wearing a corset or bustier that presses whatever she has into cleavage similar to an Oktoberfest waitress.

The Man straddles the woman's head in a kneeling position facing her feet.

The Man inserts part A into slot B. (Lubricant recommended).

Options:

• man restrains woman's hands or whatever else he can find
• man goes down on woman (depending on relative size etc.)
• second man works on other end of woman
• woman does interesting things to whatever part of his anatomy happens to be dangling over her mouth

 

[SlickTony]

I'm a bit humiliated about the fact that I don't have sufficient boobs for a really good titty fuck. Does that count?

Me neither--one of the reasons that I haven't practiced it. Also, my husband wasn't really interested. I hadn't considered the humiliation aspect of it.

 

[Spurious Scribe]

Maybe my breasts just aren't big enough.

Maybe I just don't know how to do my part

Maybe there is something wrong with him since he doesn't initiate this much

But even if all of the above were not an impediment, I just don't view this as a form of humilation. For it to be considered such, wouldn't there have to be some element added? i.e an audience or a nonconsensual aspect or restraint of some kind

 

[ClaireBlossom]

Oddly enough the first thing that came to mind to me here was that a titty fuck seemed a little highschoolish--in a way. It's humiliating, I think, in the same way that asking a girl if she's been keeping up with the pill. It's one of those jokes that gets whispered that by the time of sexual enlightenment seems forgettably misinformed. Maybe I'm wrong here, I don't know, but it's like back in the day tits, boobs, breasts, were what most people concentrated on as the sexual center of a young girl. But you grow up and you discover pussy isn't just a whispered word referring to something that brings more than misty images to mind. Titty fuck seems to have gone the way of teen boys saying they'd never go down on a girl because pussy tastes bad, or fishy or whatever.

I'm rambling a little, but give me the benefit of the doubt. A titty fuck isn't humiliating so much as the circumstances. Just wanting a titty fuck on a regular basis seems to imply to me the kind of guy that takes all the pennies from the dish beside the cash register.

-Claire.

 

[Raging Whoremoans]

Anything can be humiliating. When I was a kid, we actually used to try and get soda to squirt out of someone's nose by making them laugh whilst drinking. It was fun for all then. If it happened to me today, I'd be humiliated.

I'm endowed enough to have an easy time with tit-fucking and though it was a little exciting and actually didn't feel half bad, it was definitely not something that got either of us off. Hence, it was never indulged in again.

I don't think I'd be humiliated by it unless he had his hand wrapped around my throat and was 'taking' it from me. Of course this opinion only holds true on Monday-Wednesday-Friday.


~ R W

 

[Guest]

 

[Guest]

Must be only us women who worry about it then, eh Lou?



I've worried about suffocation (or maybe it's choking?) during fellatio... but that's neither here nor there, I suppose.

Yep, seems to be that way!

I'm not allowed to worry about gagging or choking during felatio, I just have to take it, but that's just me and my kinky ways.

Rhino said

truly humiliation is a perception and intention.

I have breast fucked (whatever)...and been sucked simultainiously.....it CAn be stimulating for a woman...depending on PERCEPTION and sensitivity...certainy not to the degree clitoral stimulation is. GIVING pleasure can (i think SHOULD) be an aphrodisiac.

i recommend you (woman) doing it because you WANT to...either for your own pleasure and/or you WANT to give pleasure to a man.

Precisely, on all counts. I find it to be highly pleasurable and stimulating, because it is being taken from me; I am giving it, willingly. And I want to feel humiliated, that's my choice, and I find it to be highly arousing. Although, tit-fucking is on the very tame end of the spectrum of such things...

I did type out some more, but I've scrubbed it. Not feeling quite so "open" today, I guess.

Lou

 

[shereads]

The use of the word "titty" could be a form of humiliation. For him, not me, because I wouldn't be able to stifle a giggle.

 

[angela146]

...I'm not allowed to worry about gagging or choking during felatio, I just have to take it, but that's just me and my kinky ways.

(Me to hubby): No dear, she lives in the UK and the Concorde isn't flying anymore.

Oh, alright, bu yu cnt lws gt vrthng ACKGHT! (Gulp)

 

[shereads]

When I was a kid, we actually used to try and get soda to squirt out of someone's nose by making them laugh whilst drinking. It was fun for all then. If it happened to me today, I'd be humiliated.

You haven't been here long, have you, RMoans? Tip: swallow that mouthful of Diet Coke before reading anything by Math Girl.

 

[McKenna]

.

 

[Guest]

 

[Guest]

 

[McKenna]

.

 

[McKenna]

.

 

[McKenna]

.

 

[Guest]