LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

"Top Secret"

I get some wood on the ball once in a while.


It's just shuffling the deck chairs...
 
LittleDixie said:
I'm guessing that the material that the FBI wanted controlled (seized) was information on their Crossfire Hurricane project. I think that the FBI didn't want that information to go public and they were irked that Trump had it.

The President of the United States has the highest security clearance. There aren't levels of classification that can be legally withheld from the President. The President also has the power to declassify documents. He did this with the Crossfire Hurricane documents.

It is most likely that the FBI wanted to Hoover up (lol) everything that they could get their hands on to prevent Trump from using the documents he had against the FBI and to try and find something that they could use to either blackmail him or criminally prosecute him. The FBI is back to the bad old days of J. Edgar Hoover.
Click to expand...

Excellent spin! Breitbart approves!

Chobham said:
If the DOJ were so sure of themselves they wouldn't be leaking like sieve's and making public statements.
Click to expand...

How so? Aren’t they simply responding to team trump’s legal appeals to release information?
 
icanhelp1 said:
My point is equal application of the law not whataboutism. Hillary was in clear violation of [18 U.S. CODE 1924 & 798 ] I would suggest you read the statutes and understand the implications of not following the laws and regulation. She was hacked on her private unsecured server and shit got loose. To add insult to injury Obama was aware. She's a lawyer, the first lady and a senator to boot. She knew the protocol involved with handling classified material.

Then there's the issue of obstruction of congress, ignoring congressional subpoenas and bleach bit servers and taking a hammer to tech devices.

The Trump case is yet to be defined. Did the DOJ overreact using strong armed tactics will be decided in a court of law. I'm content to wait and see
Click to expand...

icanhelp1 said:
My point is equal application of the law not whataboutism. Hillary was in clear violation of [18 U.S. CODE 1924 & 798 ] I would suggest you read the statutes and understand the implications of not following the laws and regulation. She was hacked on her private unsecured server and shit got loose. To add insult to injury Obama was aware. She's a lawyer, the first lady and a senator to boot. She knew the protocol involved with handling classified material.

Then there's the issue of obstruction of congress, ignoring congressional subpoenas and bleach bit servers and taking a hammer to tech devices.

The Trump case is yet to be defined. Did the DOJ overreact using strong armed tactics will be decided in a court of law. I'm content to wait and see.
Click to expand...
Please provide any evidence that Hillary's server was hacked.

Thorough investigations were conducted and there is zero evidence that she was hacked.
 
Please provide any evidence that Hillary's server was hacked.
zipman said:
Thorough investigations were conducted and there is zero evidence that she was hacked.
Click to expand...
Here’s Comey’s statement and reporting by the NYT. No direct evidence followed by a non-trivial “But…”

tatement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

“With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”

New York Times
“Hillary Clinton’s Email Was Probably Hacked, Experts Say”
“When the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, said on Tuesday that his investigators had no “direct evidence” that Hillary Clinton’s email account had been “successfully hacked,” both private experts and federal investigators immediately understood his meaning: It very likely had been breached, but the intruders were far too skilled to leave evidence of their work.
 
Meanwhile it's ok for the media to obtain leaked classified materials with zero consequences whatsoever.
 
Still waiting for the OP to post his name, address, phone number and SS number.
 
LukSkyFokker said:
MAGAts are very confused by this whole thing. How can the FBI, which 45 appointed, be so devious?
Click to expand...
We’re not confused at all, we’re quietly awaiting our two tier justice system to conclude its investigation. They’ll indict Trump, transfer the case to a DC court where 95% of the populous are democrats and we’ll have a reverse style Sussmann verdict where Trump is found guilty by a jury of Hillary’s peers. LMFAO
 
icanhelp1 said:
We’re not confused at all, we’re quietly awaiting our two tier justice system to conclude its investigation. They’ll indict Trump, transfer the case to a DC court where 95% of the populous are democrats and we’ll have a reverse style Sussmann verdict where Trump is found guilty by a jury of Hillary’s peers. LMFAO
Click to expand...
As a former Commander-In-Chief, Trump could be court martialed. Would you prefer that?
 
icanhelp1 said:
We’re not confused at all, we’re quietly awaiting our two tier justice system to conclude its investigation. They’ll indict Trump, transfer the case to a DC court where 95% of the populous are democrats and we’ll have a reverse style Sussmann verdict where Trump is found guilty by a jury of Hillary’s peers. LMFAO
Click to expand...
You're confused by the quote button, dipshit.
 
icanhelp1 said:
The CiC is not a member of the armed forces, he's a civilian and not subject to UCMJ proceedings.
Click to expand...
In the UK the position is far more complicated. The head of the UK armed forces is a serving officer. Like all military officers, he holds his commission from The Queen. He is subject to direction from the UK parliament (and the Queen's consent which is never by tradition withheld).

The Queen is the Lord High Admiral and entitled to wear an admiral's uniform - But the First Lord of the Admiralty is a civilian, a politician and part of the Cabinet. Winston Churchill held that role during parts of W1 and WW2. The First Sea Lord is a serving officer and the professional head of the Royal Navy.
 
Chobham said:
Years ago I was working on a 'Star Wars' project. The where and what is unimportant. The heart of the project was based on a discovery made by a prominent Russian Physicist. His writings were posted on a cork bulletin board prominently displayed in the work area available to, maybe, 100 other researchers, all over stamped with "TOP SECRET". The reason for the display was a joke and we all laughed our asses off about it. You see that paper was a research paper presented at CERN the year before. It was all publicly available to anyone that cared to read it, and now download it. All you need is an interest and to know where to look.

The point is that our government classifies the most outrageous things. Information that they truly have no control over, but there is a group, somewhere, that as a matter of proving that they're on the ball breaks out their rubber stamp and stamps a classification on information.

That is not to say that there isn't information that shouldn't be classified. Merely to say that when you classify everything then the entire exercise becomes a joke. Just as making everything against the law does nothing more that create a nation of criminals.

I find it interesting that so many of those "classified" folders seized at Mar a Lago were empty. Just for the yucks of it I did a search online for folders of just that sort only to find that they're readily available. Maybe pricey for the likes of you or me, but for Trump it would be chump change. And as a point of interest those folders have no external indication of what the contents may be, purposely so and that means that the DOJ has NO idea as to what the contents of those empty folders were.

I also can't help but wonder if Trump, or someone in his organization, didn't purposely 'salt' those boxes of documentation with those empty folders. And if so, that would imply that the 'insider' was known and purposely led to believe that there was information there, or was a double agent? Either way if they did 'salt' those boxes with empty folders it was a brilliant move. And if they DID make such a move it would explain a few things, like why the DOJ is playing defense, why Trump is demanding it all be made public, and why the DOJ is fighting against that public exposure.
Click to expand...

Isn't it amazing that trump is Always the victim. Lets not ask questions like why did he have all that shit to start with. No other President in history has been raided by the FBI. No other President in history refused to give up power. No other President in history has whined about being the "victim"and at the same time flout the LAW.
But it's everyone else's fault.
 
icanhelp1 said:
We’re not confused at all, we’re quietly awaiting our two tier justice system to conclude its investigation. They’ll indict Trump, transfer the case to a DC court where 95% of the populous are democrats and we’ll have a reverse style Sussmann verdict where Trump is found guilty by a jury of Hillary’s peers. LMFAO
Click to expand...
A jury of First Ladies??
 
iso36 said:
True….Lots of Americans think he’s a great guy and is being victimized.

WASHINGTON – One-fourth of the country says Donald Trump is the "true president" of the United States, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll.
Click to expand...
Oddly the same amount of Americans who think the Sun goes around the Earth.
 
phrodeau said:
I’m certain that Trump doesn’t know that.
Click to expand...
What's more problematic is you and 84 million ignorant democrats don't know it either. Y'all hoping against hope, telltale sign of TDS on steroids.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DeluxAuto
DOJ *Quietly* Shelves President Biden Autopen Investigation that the Felon Demanded
Replies
18
Views
378
briancamdudetenger2018
B
SkyBubble
China DID meddle in 2020 presidential vote and intel officials hid it from Trump, unnerving report reveals
2
Replies
42
Views
595
Wilson23
W
SkyBubble
Dems Admit on Tape Trump’s Impeachment was a Cover-Up for Biden
Replies
3
Views
118
RoryN
RoryN
M
Actual Election Fraud
Replies
7
Views
192
Iluv17
I
SkyBubble
Trump’s (alleged) grip on the Republican Party faces 3 big tests in May
Replies
7
Views
140
eric_erosfan
eric_erosfan
Back
Top