Two Ferguson Police Officers Shot

You are the claimant. Support your claim.

You see it right there in black and white. Please post anything that shows any difference. You are the one who seems to doubt the findings of the research. Can you support your belief?
 
Please provide links to the modern science.

Please provide any study that shows anything different.

You are the claimant. Support your claim.

You see it right there in black and white. Please post anything that shows any difference. You are the one who seems to doubt the findings of the research. Can you support your belief?

Wait a minute, now, possum. You said:

Modern science has confirmed that race is not merely a "social construct." . . .

But you did not link to any research. You did not even name a single scientist who holds that position. The only thing we can see "right there in black and white" is stuff you might well have made up.
 
Wait a minute, now, possum. You said:



But you did not link to any research. You did not even name a single scientist who holds that position. The only thing we can see "right there in black and white" is stuff you might well have made up.

And still we haven't seen anyone attempt to sshow some study that proves different. Even after all of the time searching for it.
 
I will take another kick at the hornet's nest.

An IQ of 75 is, as Race points out, the mental equivalent of a 12-year-old. Twelve-year-olds can drive cars and some can even fix them. Twelve-year-olds can do arithmetic and follow reasonably complex instructions. What they cannot do is run a modern society. As the authors point out, an intelligent population can tolerate a certain number of low-IQ people, but once they reach a certain proportion, the quality and texture of life change completely. This is what we find in many Third-World countries and in those parts of the United States where blacks or Hispanics are dominant
 
And still we haven't seen anyone attempt to sshow some study that proves different. Even after all of the time searching for it.

Nobody in this thread is searching for it -- nobody is obliged to search for it until you present the research that you claim shows psychological differences between "races." At this point, all the burden remains on you.
 
I will take another kick at the hornet's nest.

An IQ of 75 is, as Race points out, the mental equivalent of a 12-year-old. Twelve-year-olds can drive cars and some can even fix them. Twelve-year-olds can do arithmetic and follow reasonably complex instructions. What they cannot do is run a modern society. As the authors point out, an intelligent population can tolerate a certain number of low-IQ people, but once they reach a certain proportion, the quality and texture of life change completely. This is what we find in many Third-World countries and in those parts of the United States where blacks or Hispanics are dominant

Who are you talking about?
 
Please help me out. All of the info I have read says colored people have a higher % of criminals than any other.

That info is probably about African Americans, whose social pathologies result from American historical factors, not from their race as such. It would not apply to, e.g., African Africans.

"The American nation makes the Negro clean its boots and then proves the Negro's inferiority by the fact that he is a bootblack."

-- George Bernard Shaw
 
Who's whining? All I'm saying is get on with it, you're in the majority so run the place. Come back in a year or so and show us the new "law abiding" Ferguson.

Oh, you say that, but your majority won't let that happen.

It doesn't ever want it to happen.

That's the reason why things are the way they are now.

Every time other people different than you tries to make their and other people's worlds better, your side comes in and either yells exclusion, tries to take a piece of the pie without giving back, or sabotages the efforts because any success thereof means the eternal erasure of your hegemony.

Prime case in point is your side bitching about the local voter drive going on directly after the incident and subsequent protests.
 
Nobody in this thread is searching for it -- nobody is obliged to search for it until you present the research that you claim shows psychological differences between "races." At this point, all the burden remains on you.

Who make up that chicken shit rule?
 
It's in the "Standard Leftist Field Manual On Dialogue" under the chapter on "Debate." Essentially you state an opinion that in some way violates, refutes, or ridicules their narrative or ideology, they immediately ask for a scientific study that proves your point, and if it isn't endorsed by . . .

. . . sound peer-reviewed studies . . .


. . . it's null and void. . . .

. . . as it should be.

Science, of course, is not relevant to every issue we might debate in the Politics forum. But whether there are or are not any innate psychological differences between "races" is a scientific question. It is not a moral question. It is not a political question. It is not a religious or cultural question. It is a purely scientific question. Asking for science to back up claims is not unreasonable, to say the least.

All of the above also goes for climate change, of course.
 
Last edited:
Not wanting to engage in the debate on racial differences. It's basically an argument between physical science and social science . . .

How is it an argument between physical science and social science? The question is whether there are innate, hereditary differences. That is a question for psychology and genetics and no other sciences. The only relevance of social science to resolving it is in determining what non-genetic social factors must also be accounted for in the study.

Climate change is different, here the physical science is altered to satisfy an ideological stance of the left.

"Altered" how?
 
Last edited:
Hey Vette.....that is more of the stupid shit. Jus sayin...



Yeah, they weren't doing anything wrong in Ferguson

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/natha...uson_b_6858388.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592

Snip:

In the city of Ferguson, nearly everyone is a wanted criminal.

That may seem like hyperbole, but it is a literal fact. In Ferguson -- a city with a population of 21,000 -- 16,000 people have outstanding arrest warrants, meaning that they are currently actively wanted by the police. In other words, if you were to take four people at random, the Ferguson police would consider three of them fugitives.
 
\
I just heard on the news that a town a short distance away governed mostly by black folks has over 24,000 outstanding warrants issued against their smaller black population. That from a talk show host from St. Louis being interviewed on the O'Reilly show by Eric Bolling.

Well that would be a terrible thing too... Feel free to post something other than that to back it up.

NO RIGHT WING BLOGS PLEASE.
 
Back
Top