Two-part rompishness

[kurt_jester]

i want to share my body parts with you. i don't know that it will be an enormous following, but it might be enough.






Two-part rompishness anagrams to "porn spam is the worst"

 

[pixxel]

how can we be sure those are truly your body parts?

 

[kurt_jester]

how can we be sure those are truly your body parts?

i don't have to prove anything to you. fuckers are so demanding. one armpit and you go asking for proof.

 

[kurt_jester]

i don't have to prove anything to you. fuckers are so demanding. one armpit and you go asking for proof.

rape my dignity, all of you. here's your damn proof.

hey, wait. this isn't really so hard after all. get out the camera, and the markers, and write something on myself.

yeah, i think i can do this.

i fanshot, therefore i am

 

[kurt_jester]

this is my elbow. does anyone here like elbows?

no seriously. i'd like to know.

by the way, clio's thread is gone. poof....


have you ever read all the faq stuff about lit. this really is an amazing place. read the rules at the link on the bottom or go here. the first amendment of the us constitution is absolutely brilliant. because of it, we are free to engage in critical commentary about the world around us.

can you image what it would be like if you were not allowed to disagree with someone in power?

i will post more pics later. don't forget to vote.

 

[85bird]

It appears this thread was started cause of all the controversy on real or fake threads....there has got to be some way to prove ownership of photos...seemed like the lipstick on the ass was a good way to dispell any doubt...

 

[crashD]

It appears this thread was started cause of all the controversy on real or fake threads....there has got to be some way to prove ownership of photos...seemed like the lipstick on the ass was a good way to dispell any doubt...

what if i need to shave my ass???

 

[MetroNJ]

the 2 melons and tuna can thing was pretty funny.


as far as proving if they are "real" pics or not, a simple fan sign like you see in so many am porn boards along with a recent time\date stamp is usually enough. the lipstick on the ass\arm\chest thing is also solid proof.

personally I dont believe anyone until i've gotten to know them and if they truly
seem to be genuine, have chatted\cammed with them off site.

 

[kencannuck]

date stamps can be faked in Photoshopand other photo editing software. The lipstick on the body is a sure fire thing because unless you are a photo editing master you are not going to be able to accurately duplicate that.

As has been said either holding up a dated sign at the beginning of a sequence or writing on your body are comparatively the ony true ways of proving ownership... Lest you add your own watermark on the picture (if you know how)

Does it really matter? well according to the results of the poll attached to this thread it does...

 

[RawHumor]

That lipstick is sooo photoshopped on.

I've seen those arms before on another site!

 

[kurt_jester]

this is an am pic forum

and i've got appearances to keep up.

this may not be the best use of bandwidth. i think i need to show some skin. i can take requests. boots? sandals? oxfords? kneecaps?

That lipstick is sooo photoshopped on.

I've seen those arms before on another site!

you have seen these arms before, on mouseclickergeeksintightywhiteys.com. i was the fuzzy one on the right, holding the slide rule suggestively (just below the "join" button).

but seriously. with the technology available to the high-end consumer, everything can be faked. i've photoshopped parts of entire rooms back together because the model and my sunlighting drifted off my set into places that were not ready to be photographed. i know other can do this as well. it's not deep magic, just takes some practice.

but much of the fakery goes to intent. are the alterations/exaggerations adding to the story, or are they fleecing the readers for a power trip, and insulting the authentic posters in the process? it's tough to know, especially if you are the fleece-ed, not the fleece-ee.

for our purposes, i would endorse a lipstick "business card' with the screen name. i don't feel strongly about a date, but maybe it's a good thing. i would even go with a $36US/year subscription charge, with the expectations that folks could show whatever the hell they wanted do, with the obvious felonious exceptions.

but that's just me talking. anyone else want to talk? for what little it's worth, i have enormous respect for those willing to engage in this discussion here.

kj

 

[Paul24mny]

So let me get this right...

You want either to have everyone prove who they are that posts on this site, or have a subscription fee?

As has been said, with the proper know-how and software, even accepted forms of proof could be faked...

 

[kurt_jester]

You want either to have everyone prove who they are that posts on this site, or have a subscription fee?

As has been said, with the proper know-how and software, even accepted forms of proof could be faked...

i don't want it that way, but i would settle for it, if it meant clearing out the rubbish traffic. i'm not requesting or suggesting policy changes, but we've got people talking about this and whether or not it's a problem. that's probably a great step. i'm not offended by someone veneering their fantasy. i've weighed in on a few problems where i thought people were getting chains yanked and it looked exploitative.

anything can be faked, but if you have to work that hard to fake it, then by internet standards, you're downright bona fide! let's all skip on the retinal scans. just show that you are part of this community in some way, even as a matter of etiquette. it's not proof, it's a like a firm handshake -- not the floppy fish of a handshake you get from someone who gives you a bad impression.

food for thought. don't know what will come of it, but i'm glad you are talking about it. like i said, it's a great step.

have you voted? i really want to know, so i left the poll anonymous.

 

[pixxel]

what if i need to shave my ass???

you?
crack me up.
every time.

 

[crashD]

you?
crack me up.
every time.

eh, seems the least i can do.

 

[crashD]

It appears this thread was started cause of all the controversy on real or fake threads....there has got to be some way to prove ownership of photos...seemed like the lipstick on the ass was a good way to dispell any doubt...

i wish i'd known about lipstick when I lost a bet and used red nail polish to write the girls name on my cock

talk about pain.....

 

[noisymother]

Thank you for recognising that I'm a real person

Although I'm not really porn spam material!

Interesting discussion that you've generated here.

 

[kurt_jester]

Thank you for recognising that I'm a real person

Although I'm not really porn spam material!

Interesting discussion that you've generated here.

you might have a niche market with the feet, but anyone can see you, the real person, work your ass off to tell your story here.

thanks for ringing in.

 

[kurt_jester]

an appendage. some might say pitiful.

would you please do me the honor of voting in this threads' poll. if you haven't seen the extensive discussion in this matter, some have focused a meaningful dialogue about whether or not fake amateur pics belong in this am pics feedback thread, or if this thread is better suited for the people actually in the pics to post them and share their worlds with their readers

• much of this discussion has been in a thread that was deleted, presumably because it was commercial porn. i'm trying to bring this discussion here, so it might be around for comment.

cheering on for obviously fake pics/fake posters is an unintended insult to the authentic posters in this community. if you are a regular poster here, would you please take a moment to say how the thunderous applause for fake porn spam makes you feel about putting your work next to it?

whether you see it this way or not, if you regularly post your own pics on lit am pics, would you please ring in?

 

[faithchick]

I'll weigh in. It makes me feel like shit, and pisses me off. This is suspose to be a site for average everyday people to express themselves. Not a site for porn stars to show their professional, airbrushed pictures. But that's just my opinion.

 

[girlofurdreams]

i've weighed in on a few problems where i thought people were getting chains yanked and it looked exploitative.

i believe that if you allow someone to either take pics of you naked/semi-naked there's always the risk that said person might one day loathe you i.e. you dump their ass/sleep with their brother etc etc... and feel justified in exploiting you by sharing those private pics for the internet commumity... that's one of the main reasons there are no such pics of me in this world... if there's nudity... you won't see my face... not even for my bf.

call it a lack of trust with all in this world... or call it common sense and taking responsibility for ones actions...

i do however completely agree with the whole "just show that you are part of this community in some way, even as a matter of etiquette. it's not proof, it's a like a firm handshake -- not the floppy fish of a handshake you get from someone who gives you a bad impression" concept...
i personally don't post pics in the ampics threads... but i think it's nonsensical for professionals to be posting in an amatuer thread
especially 'fake professionals' i consider myself a logical person... and that idea does not make one iota of sense to me! lol.

if people with 'professional fake' pics want to get their rocks off by posting those pics in the threads... might i suggest they post somewhere other than ampics? depending on the subject at hand of course... eg. cocksuckers, butt.butt.butt.butt etc etc

my 'firm handshake' does not involve lipstick on my ass... merely a note for my friends:
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30331280&postcount=155

something as simple as that would do the trick... not that i've ever had anyone question my authenticity as a real person... but then, i don't pose nude pics either...



and yes, i have voted.

I'll weigh in. It makes me feel like shit, and pisses me off. This is suspose to be a site for average everyday people to express themselves. Not a site for porn stars to show their professional, airbrushed pictures. But that's just my opinion.

exactly.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Mongo want um real pictures of real amateur people showing un sharing real sexual expression. If Mongo want um fake representation or pro pics Mongo can get um from myriad websites on um internet.

But in end Mongo just pawn in game of titty, pussy and ass lust from um fairer sex.

 

[RawHumor]

my 'firm handshake' does not involve lipstick on my ass... merely a note for my friends:
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30331280&postcount=155

I'll "shake your hand" anytime, baby.

 

[kurt_jester]

noteworth discussion

there is noteworthy discussion about this issue here.

since this is a pics thread, i'll post more tonight. off to celebrate rabbits and young chickens with the family.

 

[ShaiGirl]

I voted!

I've been lurking on the ampics section for the past few days, and was following the discussion on the fake posters/twins/photo stealers/whatchamacallits.

Having posted "sexy" but not nude pics here myself (and no, I didn't bare my bits - most of my regular "fans" probably wished I did, lol), I agree with ariana & faithchick that this forum is mostly about self expression, and if it's not "yourself" doing the expression, then it somehow defeats the purpose of this board.

But then, for some (or is most?) people, they're just here for a quick fix and don't care if the girl/guy posting is real/amateur/pro, as long as she/he has the goods. Nothing wrong with that, though - to each his/her own! Long live democracy! lol

Happy Easter!