Wat’s Carbon Water-N-Stuff Thread - Concepts In Iron And Wood!!!

[Brains_N_Boobs]

 

[Brains_N_Boobs]

https://data-cdn.multi.xnxx.com/galleries/full/cd/06/4b/cd064b9890b29770e2d735a39b972ecc/3.jpg

 

[Brains_N_Boobs]

 

[ll74]

Why do you continue to use this alt?

 

[coati]

Why do you continue to use this alt?

Because his entire raison d'etre is based on bumping his ammosexuality thread.

 

[LLCox]

 

[Wat_Tyler]

 

[Rightguide]

California’s 1-Gun-per-Month Purchase Limit Violates Second Amendment, Appeals Court Rules​

Judges wrote that the state failed to meet the Bruen standard of complying with the plain language of the Amendment or having a historical analogue.


Michael Clements
Reporter

8/14/2025|Updated: 8/15/2025
0:00

The full panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to review a lower court’s ruling that California’s one gun per month purchase limit violates the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment. The mandate made final the June decision against the California law.

Last June, a three-judge panel ruled that the state failed to prove that the law met the standard set in the June 2022 Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen.

The state requested that the full en banc panel hear the case, but on Aug. 14 the court issued a three-line mandate, basically declaring the case over, the decision final, and sending it back to the lower courts.

“The judgment of this Court, entered June 20, 2025, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court,” the Aug. 14 ruling reads.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/ca...oReport&src_src=partner&src_cmp=BonginoReport

Take note: This is the first time in 134 years the 9th Circuit refused an en banc hearing on a Second Amendment case that allowed a three judge panel's pro 2a decision to stand.

 

[Rightguide]

Why do you continue to use this alt?

Why do you care?

 

[ll74]

Why do you care?

Why do you care that I care?

 

[Rightguide]

Why do you care that I care?

Because pretending your apathy makes you profound doesn’t make your opinions any less stupid.

 

[ll74]

Because pretending your apathy makes you profound doesn’t make your opinions any less stupid.

Neat

 

[rachaelwillguideyou]

Less guns when MAGAs lose Social Security?

https://michiganadvance.com/2025/08...s-congress-acts-full-benefits-end-in-7-years/

 

[HisArpy]

Hot off the presses...

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2025...mlines-dc-concealed-carry-permitting-n2192849

In the fight to restore order in the nation's capital, the Trump administration is now engaging another, proven founding principle of the republic: The Second Amendment. Specifically, the District of Columbia's concealed-carry permitting process time is being slashed, from months to days.

This is an unmitigated good thing, and actually is a fundamental liberty, not granted but protected by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Doing some periodic maintenance on a portion of the arsenal.

Wat, in your travels I'm looking for an old school gun cabinet. You know, real wood, glass, etc.

 

[stxjimmy]

“A failed political candidate in New Mexico has been sentenced to 80 years in federal prison for his convictions in a series of drive-by shootings at the homes of state and local lawmakers in the aftermath of the 2020 election.

A jury convicted former Republican candidate Solomon Peña in March of conspiracy, weapons and other charges in the shootings in December 2022 and January 2023 on the homes of four Democratic officials in Albuquerque, including the current state house speaker.

Prosecutors, who had sought a 90-year sentence, said Peña has shown no remorse and had hoped to cause political change by terrorizing people who held contrary views to him into being too afraid to take part in political life.”
Guardian.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Pena was never recognized by the party. He was considered a total whack job and he's getting what he earned.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

California’s 1-Gun-per-Month Purchase Limit Violates Second Amendment, Appeals Court Rules​

Judges wrote that the state failed to meet the Bruen standard of complying with the plain language of the Amendment or having a historical analogue.


Michael Clements
Reporter

8/14/2025|Updated: 8/15/2025
0:00

The full panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to review a lower court’s ruling that California’s one gun per month purchase limit violates the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment. The mandate made final the June decision against the California law.

Last June, a three-judge panel ruled that the state failed to prove that the law met the standard set in the June 2022 Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen.

The state requested that the full en banc panel hear the case, but on Aug. 14 the court issued a three-line mandate, basically declaring the case over, the decision final, and sending it back to the lower courts.

“The judgment of this Court, entered June 20, 2025, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court,” the Aug. 14 ruling reads.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/ca...oReport&src_src=partner&src_cmp=BonginoReport

Take note: This is the first time in 134 years the 9th Circuit refused an en banc hearing on a Second Amendment case that allowed a three judge panel's pro 2a decision to stand.

This is damned fine news. We have one of those one-gun-a-month state rules here regarding handgun purchases. Fortunately, if one has been issued/granted a CCW, then one may purchase as many handguns as one's exchequer permits by showing said (misnamed) permit with one's completed GCA68 paperwork.


In spite of how good an idea buying one gun a month is, the limit is a joke. Now, it looks to be leaving.

 

[Brains_N_Boobs]

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Got an email about "a stash of" G33/40 Mausers for sale. These are Czech rifles made from 1940 to 1942 and they have some interesting features which set them apart from regular K98s.


The biggest difference was several thousand dollars.


Oh, and the "stash" was one . . . .


Je pense que non . . . .

 

[Wat_Tyler]

 

[Wat_Tyler]

https://www.nysun.com/article/a-sec...wsletter&utm_campaign=Weekend Sun 2025-08-16

A Second Chance or a Risk to Public Safety? Department of Justice Moves To Restore Gun Rights to Some Felons​

Nearly 30 years ago, a woman wrote a bad check. Another man falsified food stamp documents. Others inflated tax deductions. All paid their dues — yet still face a lifetime ban on gun ownership.

Now, the Trump administration is pushing to change that.

The Department of Justice’s proposed rule would allow certain nonviolent felons to petition for the restoration of their gun rights — marking the most significant shift in federal firearms policy in decades. The move has stirred praise, criticism, and constitutional debate, reigniting questions over redemption, public safety, and the limits of the Second Amendment.

The proposal, published in July, would establish a legal process by which individuals with nonviolent felony convictions could petition to have their gun rights restored, provided they demonstrate rehabilitation, a clean post-conviction record, and no history of violent behavior.

“For too long, countless Americans with criminal histories have been permanently disenfranchised from exercising the right to keep and bear arms — a right every bit as constitutionally enshrined as the right to vote, the right to free speech, and the right to free exercise of religion—irrespective of whether they actually pose a threat,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi in a statement. “No longer.”


And so on . . . .

 

[Wat_Tyler]

The all new GL10 LA (long action) may look like your standard AR-10, and it's even the same size - but its patent pending design packs a MUCH. BIGGER. PUNCH! Introducing the first caliber of the series, the 6.5 PRC. Solid, accurate, and able to go the distance... you can't afford to hunt without it!




This is an interesting idea. They offer this rifle in .30-'06, of all things. That makes for a lot of possibilities.


Of course, no image. Thanks, Manglement.

 

[Rebel5soul]

I'm wondering how many of these 'wildcat's' will still be around in 20 years?

 

[Wat_Tyler]

The Ultimate Trophy Magnet​

The 6.5 Precision Rifle Cartridge from Hornady® brings home trophies — whether on the range or in the field. The big brother of the 6.5 Creedmoor, the 6.5 PRC offers a 200+ fps velocity advantage in a compact magnum cartridge. Built to deliver long, heavy, high‑performance bullets, it provides repeatable accuracy, low recoil and performance well beyond 1,000 yards.



Being as the origin of this one isn't on some guy's reloading table/bench and that the bullet gurus made it, I reckon it might just well have legs.