There is no mass transit by air. Nobody commutes that way.I stated above somewhere that aviation is the backbone of US travel…that’s true for mass transit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no mass transit by air. Nobody commutes that way.I stated above somewhere that aviation is the backbone of US travel…that’s true for mass transit.
Jesus kid. I take this route all the time. While you’re doing some research on this, look into the car/part manufacturers in Detroit and their daily shuttles down to Greenville, SC and most likely into Birmingham, AL. Probably daily to Tennessee where I think Toyota has a plant.There is no mass transit by air. Nobody commutes that way.
Business trips are not the same thing as commuting.Jesus kid. I take this route all the time. While you’re doing some research on this, look into the car/part manufacturers in Detroit and their daily shuttles down to Greenville, SC and most likely into Birmingham, AL. Probably daily to Tennessee where I think Toyota has a plant.
These are just a few examples. BTW…those LGA-BOS routes are always full.
Of course. HSR lines much longer than that could be economically viable -- since they would be there for passengers taking shorter trips.The sweet spot for HSR is 100-600 miles. For trips like that, it's faster and cheaper than flying. We don't need a national HSR network, just a collection of regional network to link major urban centers.
Do tell me about “business” trips and “commuting!”Business trips are not the same thing as commuting.
And you are making a strong case for HSR, which can replace airplanes.
Nope, I'm stating why I agree with you. But not your reason why. There will be no HSR built in your lifetime because cheap fuel and vehicles offer a great a freedom of transportation. Take all that away and you'd be begging for HSR.Nice Non sequitur but you’re dodging the OP’s thread intent.
Actually it took 24 years to triple ( if we use the 1950 date) , but hey....facts seem irrelevant to you.Which was answered and you added absolutely nothing but a stupid gotcha. You got me…it’s tripled in 70 yrs.
See, the above post illustrates exactly why your logic always fails. It's black or it's white, you cant't see or understand "grey".…
Now go back to the 50’s and connect some dots on why conventional rail and HSR will never materialize as viable options in this country.
Even if you tripled gas in the next five years, cars aren’t going anywhere. I’m sure the usual suspects will start bleating for HSR or other options, but the fact remains. Cars ain’t go’n nowhere and HSR will never materialize in our lifetime. The one caveat will be the total mess in California. It actually may get built (one of these decades) but it will never make one thin dime.Nope, I'm stating why I agree with you. But not your reason why. There will be no HSR built in your lifetime because cheap fuel and vehicles offer a great a freedom of transportation. Take all that away and you'd be begging for HSR.
Actually it took 24 years to triple ( if we use the 1950 date) , but hey....facts seem irrelevant to you.
See, the above post illustrates exactly why your logic always fails. It's black or it's white, you cant't see or understand "grey".
How much money has the interstate system made?Even if you tripled gas in the next five years, cars aren’t going anywhere. I’m sure the usual suspects will start bleating for HSR or other options, but the fact remains. Cars ain’t go’n nowhere and HSR will never materialize in our lifetime. The one caveat will be the total mess in California. It actually may get built (one of these decades) but it will never make one thin dime.
Canada has three or four options on the table. I don’t know how serious they are, but if, and that’s a big IF, they get built. Let’s see how the cost effectiveness and what RSM they generate. It’s an apples to apples comparison (almost)….
Nationwide, as I write this, there are under construction 138 kilometers of new light rail or streetcar lines; 34 kilometers of new metro lines; 310 kilometers of new and improved bus lines; and 234 kilometers of regional rail or commuter rail. Many of those projects are expected to open in 2025.
Think of it like mass transit. It never makes money at the farebox -- it's one of those things it is worthwhile to spend money on.The one caveat will be the total mess in California. It actually may get built (one of these decades) but it will never make one thin dime.
Still waiting for some light rail in Tampa.An interesting look at rail transit projects in the US. The whole thing is worth reading for those who’d like real information.
2025 projects include Honolulu, Boston, Atlanta and many places in between.
How do you put a value on interstate commerce for the last 70 years? Not sure, but rest assured, it’s made up in cost, maybe not directly, but in wealth generated. Again…The Google is yer friend…How much money has the interstate system made?
See post #60.How do you put a value on interstate commerce for the last 70 years? Not sure, but rest assured, it’s made up in cost, maybe not directly, but in wealth generated. Again…The Google is yer friend…
It wont make money as constituted but your point is taken. The money is the root of all evil on this though. The CA rail (I’m sure it has a project name) is coming in at over $2.5 million a mile. To get politicians and the average taxpayer (who in all probability will never ride said Choo-choo) behind that kind of expenditure will, as I’ve said, take a momentous shift in attitudes.Think of it like mass transit. It never makes money at the farebox -- it's one of those things it is worthwhile to spend money on.
We spend a lot of tax money to build and maintain roads and streets, and we never expect to collect any revenue from those.
That’s the point though. You HAVE seen revenue from the Interstate system. Go ask Roadway Trucking company how much money they make…then tally in all the others and the independents. Rail will never cover that other than Freight, which is a whole other animal and is the gold standard worldwide.See post #60.
There's a lot of traffic between SF and LA. People who drive now would take the HSR if it were available.To get politicians and the average taxpayer (who in all probability will never ride said Choo-choo)
Other than the one in CA, have any of the others broken ground yet?
Not that I know of. Probably it would require a president who simply cared about getting cars and trucks off the roads, and we've never had one who did, not even Carter.Other than the one in CA, have any of the others broken ground yet?
Yes. Brightline West has broken ground.Other than the one in CA, have any of the others broken ground yet?
This Makes more sense than the other line IMO…have you ever seen the traffic from the air LAS LAX? It’s a solid line of lights especially on weekends and holidays.Yes. Brightline West has broken ground.
Ground was broken about a year ago. This will be Brightline’s 2nd HSR in the US.They’re doing field engineering work at this point. Haven’t quite broken ground so to speak, but it has to be done. This one actually makes sense. Using an interstate corridor. That’s really the best way forward if this kind of thing is going to happen.
*****Hot off the presses…the silver shovels hit dirt in 2 months possibly
It will say nothing good about our country, if HSR from LA to Vegas gets built before HSR from LA to SF.Yes. Brightline West has broken ground.
I want HSR in as many places in the US as possible. I don’t care which opens first as long as they all open.It will say nothing good about our country, if HSR from LA to Vegas gets built before HSR from LA to SF.