What’s worse than unsolicited dick pics?

I think it demonstrates a total lack of any ability to either communicate with another human being, or - perhaps more likely - to see women as being fully human.

I guess it’s sort of like this:
  1. I’m a horny guy
  2. I’d love it if some random woman on the internet sent me a nude photo
  3. Therfore random women on the internet would probably appreciate me sending them a nude photo
Socrates would have been proud of the logic.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m pro-cock. I’d just prefer to select which one myself. And IRL is a lot more fun than a random photo.

Dick pics also feel a bit like marking territory or a peacock displaying its feathers. Thing is, peacock feathers are at least pretty.

I don’t know about anyone else, but I’ve never trawled the internet looking for random dick pics. And I say that as someone who enjoys porn.

Emily

Yeah, pretty much the mentality I think. Men are generally visual creatures.We wanna see female genitalia. It arouses us. So we assume women are the same.

(Not all guys, obviously)

I've sexted with lots of women over the years. swapping pics can be fun. But that's when it's mutual. You're both into it, consenting, working on turning each other on.

I've never understood sending a dick pic or any other pic to a woman just out of the blue, unrequested.

Maybe some guy young and dumb with limited experience; I get him thinking it might work. I still don't condone it obviously.

But any guy with even a little experience who's actually talked with a woman would know it's pretty much as you say; most women aren't dropping their panties at the sight of some random dick.

And in fact in most cases it's the opposite effect of what's wanted and the woman isn't just turned off but grossed out and disgusted.
 
swapping pics can be fun
The operative word is “unsolicited.” If there is consent on both sides, then it’s just humans having fun and no harm done.

But “Hi, I’m [name here] and here is my cock,” is not a terribly effective strategy. The funniest is when reverse image search reveals it’s certainly not their cock either 🤣.

Emily
 
The operative word is “unsolicited.” If there is consent on both sides, then it’s just humans having fun and no harm done.

But “Hi, I’m [name here] and here is my cock,” is not a terribly effective strategy. The funniest is when reverse image search reveals it’s certainly not their cock either 🤣.

Emily

I suppose I can understand guys whos junk may be..less impressive... using stunt cocks I suppose.

Although it only sets them up for failure should they actually get anywhere with a woman.

I can only imagine the horror of a guy using a stunt cock photo only to have to woman respond positively and beg for another showing both his cock and face 🤣.

Good luck with getting the right camera angle, my dude.
 
The operative word is “unsolicited.” If there is consent on both sides, then it’s just humans having fun and no harm done.

But “Hi, I’m [name here] and here is my cock,” is not a terribly effective strategy. The funniest is when reverse image search reveals it’s certainly not their cock either 🤣.

Emily
Now I'm imagining a super secret spy agency where, instead of fingerprints or retinal scans, the agents all have to stuff their weens into a scanner to open doors and whatnot.
They will obviously be called MI-Dicks.
 
Random breasts and other female private parts don't arouse me either. I need a beautiful face attached to them, and if I can know something about her personality too and it's a good one, that is even more of a bonus.

Agreed, to a degree.

I've had several online lady friends over the years and sometimes while we were having our fun, they still felt safer NOT including their face in certain pics

Which I fully understood. It wasn't about their trust in ME. Just playing it safe, and I totally get it.

But knowing the pics were real and sent with the intent to help arouse me still worked; she sent them willingly knowing I would enjoy them. That's a turn on.

I get your point though. If a woman I didn't know or ever talk to before sent me nudes out of the blue, I might be interested, but without knowing her or even if the pics are real, I'm not getting too excited just yet.
 
I think I must be unique in this world. My marriage predates dick pic technology, so I've never sent one, and never been on the receiving end of racy photos from anyone either.
 
I was mainly talking about alleged women who post their nude selfies as part of their online dating profiles. If she doesn't leave something to a random guy's imagination, that's a yellow flag at the least. If I know her, well, yeah, that's different.
 
It really depends. There’s a general rule regarding politics and religion that prevents screeds from getting posted, but there are plenty of stories where religious people can/do act deplorably. I’ve done it myself; one of the characters’ backstories in Grace Restored is about being molested by a youth pastor and the church (including her parents) backing him instead of her. Attacking zealots or hypocrites seems to go over fine, even in LW; attacking religion does not.

And in Lesbian Sex a lot of stories deal with characters who've encountered religiously-driven homophobia. (Wouldn't be surprised if GM too but I haven't read that one heavily.) I've never seen much pushback to stories that acknowledge the fairly self-evident truth that religion isn't always friendly to queer relationships.
 
You can also condemn zealots while sanctifying the good religious people and clearing up confusion over which is which. I’ve accomplished that with my religious characters in Counseling, Rendezvous, Passion, and Girls Dorm Gathering.
 
And in Lesbian Sex a lot of stories deal with characters who've encountered religiously-driven homophobia. (Wouldn't be surprised if GM too but I haven't read that one heavily.) I've never seen much pushback to stories that acknowledge the fairly self-evident truth that religion isn't always friendly to queer relationships.
Years ago, a caught the mini series based on the book, Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit. It's about a girl growing up in a Pentecostal evangelical household, coming to understand that she is a lesbian.
 
Years ago, a caught the mini series based on the book, Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit. It's about a girl growing up in a Pentecostal evangelical household, coming to understand that she is a lesbian.
A great book - as indeed all of Jeanette Winterson's are, most of them beautifully erotic, except the autobiographical "Why be happy when you could be normal?" which is the 'silent twin' book to Oranges (semi-autobiographical).
 
easy. Male butthole pics.
Arses tend to be nicely curved and the more attractive bit of anyone, for an erotic photo. Zooming in on an anus, male or female, I'd find uninteresting in a photo. There's something about zooming in on any body parts, even ones I'd generally find attractive, that really puts me off.

I don't know if it's because I studied too much biology, or I'm female, or what, but I'll happily watch porn of pretty much anyone getting it on, but get turned off as soon as the camera decides that instead of admiring the shapes getting together, the curves, the movements, what we really want to see is a small lubricated nub or orifice out of context.

An inch of what must be cockflesh sliding back and forth past a pink glistening membrane is one of the least erotic sights ever. I guess your average porn-liking bloke must like it, though, because all porn vids seem to do it.
 
Where can I join the opt out list for birthday dick pics?

Emily
Actually, the last one to ask for them was unsatisfied, not getting as many as she wanted. And I have a feeling that those who respond to birthday wishes are not the ones sending unsolicited picks...
 
I think I must be unique in this world. My marriage predates dick pic technology, so I've never sent one, and never been on the receiving end of racy photos from anyone either.
Alright people, this wasn't intended as a challenge! You can stop sending them now.
 
Back
Top