Homburg
Daring greatly
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2007
- Posts
- 13,578
Here's the transcript from the end of the piece:
Palin: I'll try to find you some and I'll bring them to you.
SO annoying. This is a perfect example of why I couldn't stand listening to her.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's the transcript from the end of the piece:
Palin: I'll try to find you some and I'll bring them to you.
Is it just me, or is there a pretty big difference in the way Palin interviewed with Couric and the way she presented herself at the RNC?
She was so much more poised and polished during her speech. She really came across as confident and articulate. Now, of course she didn't write her speech, and she practiced that thing to within an inch of its life, I'm sure. But still, "find ya some and bring 'em to ya"? It sounded positively Bush-like.
I may be turning into paranoid Homburg here, but is there a chance it's on purpose? I know it sounds crazy, but I thought Bush sounded like the biggest idiot ever and people voted for him anyway. I wonder if she is affecting a casual pattern of speech to sound more familiar, and also appear sympathetic when reporters ask her tough questions.
I know it sounds nuts. I do. It's just that I heard parts of the Couric interview replayed on the radio this morning and I got the distinct impression that it was all part of an act.
I may be turning into paranoid Homburg here, but is there a chance it's on purpose? I know it sounds crazy, but I thought Bush sounded like the biggest idiot ever and people voted for him anyway. I wonder if she is affecting a casual pattern of speech to sound more familiar, and also appear sympathetic when reporters ask her tough questions.
I know it sounds nuts. I do. It's just that I heard parts of the Couric interview replayed on the radio this morning and I got the distinct impression that it was all part of an act.
I wouldn't be surprised. It might be to make it seem like shes being picked on and that shes just trying to do her gosh darned best.
Or she could just be an idiot.
These are not mutually exclusive. You can train a planerium worm to follow patterns, so I'm sure that Sarah is trainable to present multiple different images in different circumstances for effect. None of this makes her any less of an idiot.
SNL couldn't make this stuff up.
"We-- we do-- it's very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where-- where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is-- from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to-- to our state."
What the hell does that even mean?
Because even after 5 kids she looks better than you do

Just hold the fuck on!
You th, t, think that bitch looks better than me?
*bursts into sobs*
Just hold the fuck on!
You th, t, think that bitch looks better than me?
*bursts into sobs*
![]()
I don't know. I've only seen you naked.

Holy shit, Kathleen Parker.
Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League.
No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I’ve been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I’ve also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My cringe reflex is exhausted.
Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut the verbiage and there’s not much content there. Here’s but one example of many from her interview with Hannity: “Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we’re talking about today. And that’s something that John McCain, too, his track record, proving that he can work both sides of the aisle, he can surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this.”
When Couric pointed to polls showing that the financial crisis had boosted Obama’s numbers, Palin blustered wordily: “I’m not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and see who’s more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who’s actually done it?”
If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself.

I agree, it's a great line! Given the source, it's just astounding.Wow. Just, wow.
Great line btw!
LMAO!
![]()
When I saw that "wishin' for and hopin' for solutions" part, I didn't know whether to burst out laughing, crying or singing (Wishin' and hopin' and thinkin' and prayin'...).Holy shit, Kathleen Parker.
Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League.
No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I’ve been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I’ve also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My cringe reflex is exhausted.
Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut the verbiage and there’s not much content there. Here’s but one example of many from her interview with Hannity: “Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we’re talking about today. And that’s something that John McCain, too, his track record, proving that he can work both sides of the aisle, he can surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this.”
When Couric pointed to polls showing that the financial crisis had boosted Obama’s numbers, Palin blustered wordily: “I’m not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and see who’s more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who’s actually done it?”
If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself.
That article is spot on. So many great observations, but with the debate coming up on Thursday I'll just highlight this one.I don't know if you have to be a subscriber to see this, but it is an interesting opinion piece about Palin, affirmative action, and the 'glass ceiling' for women.
ETA: I posted this link before reading the one you posted, JM. Great minds and all that.![]()
Morality has nothing to do with religion, as it is used on the national stage. Not in the U.S., or Iran, or Gaza. In the hands of political figures, organized religion is a tool to coerce the masses. That's what it is today, and what it has always been.I don't hate her but dislike her views on most things. Compared to Newt Gingrich(spelling?) shes humanish I suppose. AS a non yank I find it strange that relligion plays such a large role in your politics since a politician is pretty much the most immoral profesion apart from laywer or crackdealer perhaps.
HAHAHA! Great analogy, JD.Compared to Our Maggie shes a wee poodle wearing blusher!
That article is spot on. So many great observations, but with the debate coming up on Thursday I'll just highlight this one.
"The McCain campaign, tacitly acknowledging how out of her depth she'll be no matter how many all-nighters she pulls, demanded--and, shockingly, got--special modifications to the veep debate format so that there would be no follow-up questions. After all, it wouldn't be right to expect Palin to compete on normal terms with Joe Biden, who has the totally unfair advantage of being deeply versed in domestic and foreign policy and knowing how the world's business is done. Lower standards for potential leaders of the world's most powerful country, in the name of diversity: that's what Republicans stand for now."
That article is spot on. So many great observations, but with the debate coming up on Thursday I'll just highlight this one.
"The McCain campaign, tacitly acknowledging how out of her depth she'll be no matter how many all-nighters she pulls, demanded--and, shockingly, got--special modifications to the veep debate format so that there would be no follow-up questions. After all, it wouldn't be right to expect Palin to compete on normal terms with Joe Biden, who has the totally unfair advantage of being deeply versed in domestic and foreign policy and knowing how the world's business is done. Lower standards for potential leaders of the world's most powerful country, in the name of diversity: that's what Republicans stand for now."