Over Greenland. Nobody ever fought before over Greenland. Americans haven't even thought about Greenland since the whaling industry died out.The US of America is about to lose all of their allies.
All. Of. Them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Over Greenland. Nobody ever fought before over Greenland. Americans haven't even thought about Greenland since the whaling industry died out.The US of America is about to lose all of their allies.
All. Of. Them.
He could always get Puerto Rico to be the 51st state. Of course that would mean two more Democratic Party Senators and a half-dozen Representatives. . . .Trump wants the distinction of being the first president since 1898 to expand the American territory.
That's pretty much it.
Can't really say how the party system would shake out there. Up to now, local politics in PR has revolved around the issue of the island's future constitutional status -- there is a statehood party, an independence party, and a party favoring indefinite continuation of the status quo. Statehood would resolve all that once and for all and the parties would realign around other issues. Presumably one party that caucuses with the Dems would emerge, and one that caucuses with the Pubs -- a Latin Catholic culture is conservative enough that they have a chance.He could always get Puerto Rico to be the 51st state. Of course that would mean two more Democratic Party Senators and a half-dozen Representatives. . . .
Gerard Butler and Morena Baccarin are in Greenland."The Epstein files are in Greenland."
He's destroyed our soft power centers, destroyed trust with most of our partners, left treaties unilaterally..... he's taken decades of trust and shredded themI hope the people who voted for Trump is ready to pay the price.
Even if USA goes winning out of this it will cost a lot!
I think this was the plan all along with the attack on Ukraine. But there was this Biden guy who came between Trump and Putin and stalled the plan for them.Putin has to be licking his chops about now.
His boy, Trump, is breaking up NATO.
So the US could deploy troops to Greenland with our current alliance.Danish Intelligence Confirms The Russia-China Threat To Greenland
by Tyler Durden
Friday, Jan 16, 2026 - 01:15 AM
A 2025 Intelligence Assessment by the government of Denmark highlights the long term Russian and Chinese 'threat' in Arctic waters, at a moment Greenland officials have rejected the US assertion that the large resource-rich island and its waters are being gradually influenced and taken over by the Russia/China 'menace'.
Trump has recently stated, "We need that because if you take a look outside of Greenland right now, there are Russian destroyers, there are Chinese destroyers and, bigger, there are Russian submarines all over the place. We’re not gonna have Russia or China occupy Greenland, and that’s what they’re going to do if we don’t."
While Trump has already proven he often first sets his interventionist policy and agenda, and then goes looking for a justification in a post hoc fallacy kind of way (a longstanding tradition among pretty much all American presidents, sadly), the Danish intelligence report does seem to add general weight to Trump's arguments.
For a sampling of official quotes from the Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS) - Intelligence Outlook 2025, complied by Conservative pundit Nick Solheim:
The rest here: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/danish-intelligence-russia-china-threat-greenland
Boy, that takes you back!the Russia/China 'menace'
^ Reichguide again displaying his useful idiocy.Danish Intelligence Confirms The Russia-China Threat To Greenland
by Tyler Durden
Friday, Jan 16, 2026 - 01:15 AM
A 2025 Intelligence Assessment by the government of Denmark highlights the long term Russian and Chinese 'threat' in Arctic waters, at a moment Greenland officials have rejected the US assertion that the large resource-rich island and its waters are being gradually influenced and taken over by the Russia/China 'menace'.
Trump has recently stated, "We need that because if you take a look outside of Greenland right now, there are Russian destroyers, there are Chinese destroyers and, bigger, there are Russian submarines all over the place. We’re not gonna have Russia or China occupy Greenland, and that’s what they’re going to do if we don’t."
While Trump has already proven he often first sets his interventionist policy and agenda, and then goes looking for a justification in a post hoc fallacy kind of way (a longstanding tradition among pretty much all American presidents, sadly), the Danish intelligence report does seem to add general weight to Trump's arguments.
For a sampling of official quotes from the Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS) - Intelligence Outlook 2025, complied by Conservative pundit Nick Solheim:
The rest here: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/danish-intelligence-russia-china-threat-greenland
Have you actually read the report from the DDIS?Danish Intelligence Confirms The Russia-China Threat To Greenland
by Tyler Durden
Friday, Jan 16, 2026 - 01:15 AM
A 2025 Intelligence Assessment by the government of Denmark highlights the long term Russian and Chinese 'threat' in Arctic waters, at a moment Greenland officials have rejected the US assertion that the large resource-rich island and its waters are being gradually influenced and taken over by the Russia/China 'menace'.
Trump has recently stated, "We need that because if you take a look outside of Greenland right now, there are Russian destroyers, there are Chinese destroyers and, bigger, there are Russian submarines all over the place. We’re not gonna have Russia or China occupy Greenland, and that’s what they’re going to do if we don’t."
While Trump has already proven he often first sets his interventionist policy and agenda, and then goes looking for a justification in a post hoc fallacy kind of way (a longstanding tradition among pretty much all American presidents, sadly), the Danish intelligence report does seem to add general weight to Trump's arguments.
For a sampling of official quotes from the Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS) - Intelligence Outlook 2025, complied by Conservative pundit Nick Solheim:
The rest here: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/danish-intelligence-russia-china-threat-greenland
I don't know if you read thru the rapport, but it in short words said that since the US increased their interest in Greenland, the risk of Russia and China getting more interested has increased, and a risk of more Russian and Chinese ships in the area around Greenland, Bering Strip and the Artic sea will increase the risk of a confrontation.you just keep racking up those non credible news sources.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/
Home ZeroHedge – Bias and Credibility
ZeroHedge – Bias and Credibility
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
- Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY/PSEUDOSCIENCE (8.1)
Factual Reporting: LOW (8.0)
Country: Bulgaria
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Seems more like confrontation, picking fights. Also, another distraction with homefront problems. Consider the source of the story and their reviews with conspiracy theories, less than factual reporting and low credibility.I don't know if you read thru the rapport, but it in short words said that since the US increased their interest in Greenland, the risk of Russia and China getting more interested has increased, and a risk of more Russian and Chinese ships in the area around Greenland, Bering Strip and the Artic sea will increase the risk of a confrontation.
It says nothing about "Russian and Chinese ships are all over Greenland".